Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Leao Winter Defender UHP
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tires, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P finished ahead 4 times and the Winter Defender UHP not once. The WinterContact TS 870 P was stronger in dry, wet, snow, comfort and value.
Performance profile
15 measurements from the 4 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
WinterContact TS 870 P
Winter Defender UHP
Not ahead on any measurement here
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 6 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
WinterContact TS 870 P
Winter Defender UHP
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | WinterContact TS 870 P | Gap | Winter Defender UHP | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry WinterContact TS 870 P ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 138 | 2.4% | 142 | 2-1 |
| Dry Handling (s) | 68.84 | 1.9% | 70.18 | 2-0 |
| Dry Handling (mph) | 61.3 | 2.7% | 59.7 | 1-0 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | 7.2% | scored | 2-0 |
| Wet WinterContact TS 870 P ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 120 | 19.3% | 152 | 4-0 |
| Wet Handling (s) | 65.77 | 7.8% | 71.1 | 2-0 |
| Wet Handling (mph) | 43.7 | 10% | 39.8 | 1-0 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | scored | 18.8% | scored | 2-0 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 52 | 3.1% | 50.6 | 2-1 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 10 | 5.1% | 9.6 | 2-0 |
| Snow WinterContact TS 870 P ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking ft | 66 | 7.5% | 71 | 3-0 |
| Snow Traction s | 4.8 | 9.5% | 5.23 | 2-0 |
| Snow Traction (lbf) | 580 | 0.3% | 579 | 1-0 |
| Snow Handling s | 89.23 | 3.3% | 92.28 | 2-0 |
| Snow Handling (mph) | 40.6 | 1.1% | 40.2 | 1-0 |
| Subj. Snow Handling pts | scored | 10.5% | scored | 2-0 |
| Snow Slalom ft/s² | 13.7 | 7.7% | 12.7 | 1-0 |
| Comfort WinterContact TS 870 P ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 8.5% | scored | 3-0 |
| Subj. Noise pts | scored | 5.6% | scored | 1-0 |
| Noise dB | 70.9 | 0.7 dB | 71.55 | 2-0 |
| Value WinterContact TS 870 P ahead | ||||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 7.13 | 13.9% | 8.27 | 3-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 4 tests, 2023 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | WinterContact TS 870 P | Field | Winter Defender UHP |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tire Test | P4 of 12 | P12 of 12 | |
| 2026 Winter Tire Braking Test - 50 Sets | P2 of 50 | P44 of 50 | |
| 2023 Tire Reviews SUV Winter Tire Test | P1 of 9 | P9 of 9 | |
| 2023 Tire Reviews Winter Tire Test | P3 of 11 | P11 of 11 |
WinterContact TS 870 P vs Winter Defender UHP: your questions
Is the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P or the Leao Winter Defender UHP the better tire?
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tires, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P finished ahead 4 times and the Winter Defender UHP not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the WinterContact TS 870 P scores 9.3 and the Winter Defender UHP 3.2 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the WinterContact TS 870 P or the Winter Defender UHP?
The WinterContact TS 870 P led 13 of the 14 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 19.3% shorter in the wet across 4 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The WinterContact TS 870 P led 7 of the 8 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.4% shorter in the dry across 3 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The WinterContact TS 870 P led 12 of the 12 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 7.5% shorter on snow across 3 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The WinterContact TS 870 P had 13.9% lower rolling resistance (3 tests).
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The WinterContact TS 870 P was 0.7 dB quieter (2 tests).
What do owners say?
Owners rate the WinterContact TS 870 P 85% from 33 reviews; the Winter Defender UHP has no owner reviews yet.
Which is more expensive?
In the 3 tests that listed prices, the WinterContact TS 870 P was the dearer tire in 3 of them, by 89.7% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The WinterContact TS 870 P is made in 121 sizes (16 to 23 inch) and the Winter Defender UHP in 38 (15 to 20 inch). 29 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the WinterContact TS 870 P is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Winter Defender UHP C and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
8-16 in 25 shared tests
vs 
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
3-14 in 21 shared tests
vs 
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Michelin Alpin 7
5-0 in 5 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
5-9 in 15 shared tests
vs 
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
1-2 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
13-3 in 17 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
8-10 in 18 shared tests
vs 
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Semperit Speed Grip 5
9-1 in 10 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Review the WinterContact TS 870 P Review the Winter Defender UHP
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.