Hankook Winter i cept evo2 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Ahead in each discipline
The Hankook Winter i cept evo2 and the Vredestein Wintrac Pro have met in one independent test so far, and the Wintrac Pro finished ahead. The Wintrac Pro was stronger in dry, wet, comfort and value.
Performance profile
9 measurements from the one shared test, each tire shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
Winter i cept evo2
Wintrac Pro
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 97%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
Winter i cept evo2
Wintrac Pro
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Winter i cept evo2
Not ahead in any category
Wintrac Pro
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Winter i cept evo2 80% from 28 reviews and the Wintrac Pro 87% from 30. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tires' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tire that did better.
| Measurement | Winter i cept evo2 | Gap | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Wintrac Pro ahead | |||
| Dry Braking ft | 144 | 5% | 137 |
| Dry Handling mph | 74.3 | 0.6% | 74.7 |
| Wet Wintrac Pro ahead | |||
| Wet Braking ft | 156 | 1% | 158 |
| Wet Handling mph | 57.9 | 1.8% | 59 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 42.6 | 6.9% | 45.5 |
| Snow Level | |||
| Snow Braking ft | 94 | 1.7% | 95 |
| Snow Handling mph | 30.3 | 0.8% | 30.5 |
| Comfort Wintrac Pro ahead | |||
| Noise dB | 75.7 | 2 dB | 73.7 |
| Value Wintrac Pro ahead | |||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 10.35 | 0.3% | 10.32 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2019
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Winter i cept evo2 | Field | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tire Test | P5 of 11 | P2 of 11 |
Winter i cept evo2 vs Wintrac Pro: your questions
Is the Hankook Winter i cept evo2 or the Vredestein Wintrac Pro the better tire?
The Hankook Winter i cept evo2 and the Vredestein Wintrac Pro have met in one independent test so far, and the Wintrac Pro finished ahead. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Winter i cept evo2 scores 6.8 and the Wintrac Pro 9 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Winter i cept evo2 or the Wintrac Pro?
The Wintrac Pro led 2 of the 3 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The Wintrac Pro led 2 of the 2 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
Across the shared tests the snow measurements are split 1-1 between the Winter i cept evo2 and the Wintrac Pro.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.2/10 for the Winter i cept evo2 and 8.7/10 for the Wintrac Pro.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Winter i cept evo2 80% from 28 reviews and the Wintrac Pro 87% from 30. 77% of Winter i cept evo2 owners would buy it again, against 93% for the Wintrac Pro.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Winter i cept evo2 is made in 80 sizes (15 to 22 inch) and the Wintrac Pro in 119 (17 to 22 inch). 49 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Winter i cept evo2 is graded C for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Wintrac Pro B and D.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
11-3 in 14 shared tests
vs
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
16-0 in 16 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
17-1 in 18 shared tests
vs
Kumho Winter Craft WP52 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
1-6 in 8 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
22-8 in 31 shared tests
vs
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
10-6 in 17 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
10-0 in 10 shared tests
vs
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
1-7 in 8 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.