Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Falken ZIEX ZE320
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tires, the Falken ZIEX ZE320 finished ahead 2 times and the Turanza 6 once. The Turanza 6 was stronger in wet and value, the ZIEX ZE320 in dry and comfort.
Performance profile
7 measurements from the 3 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Turanza 6
ZIEX ZE320
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 97%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 9 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Turanza 6
ZIEX ZE320
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Turanza 6
Not ahead in any category
ZIEX ZE320
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Turanza 6 77% from 73 reviews and the ZIEX ZE320 87% from 17. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | Turanza 6 | Gap | ZIEX ZE320 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry ZIEX ZE320 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 127 | 4.2% | 122 | 0-3 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Wet Turanza 6 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 115 | 2.2% | 117 | 2-1 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete ft | 132 | 6.2% | 124 | 0-1 |
| Wet Handling s | 75.9 | 0.8% | 76.55 | 2-0 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | scored | 28.6% | scored | 1-0 |
| Wet Circle s | 11.48 | 0.4% | 11.53 | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 49 | 0.2% | 49.1 | 1-2 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 11.2 | 9.7% | 10.2 | 1-0 |
| Comfort ZIEX ZE320 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Subj. Noise pts | scored | 16.7% | scored | 0-1 |
| Rough Noise dB | 73.5 | 0.3 dB | 73.2 | 0-1 |
| Value Turanza 6 ahead | ||||
| Wear miles | 34,548 | 48.3% | 23,301 | 1-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 7.6 | 4.9% | 7.99 | 1-0 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.45 | 1.8% | 5.55 | 2-0 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 66 | 7% | 71 | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 3 tests, 2025 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Turanza 6 | Field | ZIEX ZE320 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tire Test | P5 of 10 | P4 of 10 | |
| 2026 ADAC Summer Tire Test | P6 of 16 | P5 of 16 | |
| 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tire Test | P4 of 14 | P13 of 14 |
Turanza 6 vs ZIEX ZE320: your questions
Is the Bridgestone Turanza 6 or the Falken ZIEX ZE320 the better tire?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tires, the Falken ZIEX ZE320 finished ahead 2 times and the Turanza 6 once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Turanza 6 scores 8.4 and the ZIEX ZE320 9.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Turanza 6 or the ZIEX ZE320?
The Turanza 6 led 8 of the 12 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.2% shorter in the wet across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The ZIEX ZE320 led 3 of the 5 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.2% shorter in the dry across 3 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Turanza 6 used 1.8% less fuel (2 tests). Owners rate wear 7.2/10 for the Turanza 6 and 8.1/10 for the ZIEX ZE320.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7.7/10 for the Turanza 6 and 8.5/10 for the ZIEX ZE320.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Turanza 6 77% from 73 reviews and the ZIEX ZE320 87% from 17. 63% of Turanza 6 owners would buy it again, against 80% for the ZIEX ZE320.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the two were priced within 1% of each other on average.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Turanza 6 is made in 148 sizes (15 to 22 inch) and the ZIEX ZE320 in 53 (15 to 18 inch). 42 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Turanza 6 is graded A for wet grip and B for rolling resistance in most sizes; the ZIEX ZE320 A and C.
More comparisons with these tires
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.

