Goodride SW608 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
In the 6 independent tests that ran both tires, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 finished ahead 6 times and the SW608 not once. The Krisalp HP3 was stronger in dry, wet, snow, ice, comfort and value.
Performance profile
12 measurements from the 6 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
SW608
Not ahead on any measurement here
Krisalp HP3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
SW608
Not ahead in any category
Krisalp HP3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
SW608
Not ahead in any category
Krisalp HP3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the SW608 64% from 9 reviews and the Krisalp HP3 84% from 36. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | SW608 | Gap | Krisalp HP3 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Krisalp HP3 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 148 | 1.8% | 145 | 0-1 |
| Wet Krisalp HP3 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 131 | 8.9% | 120 | 0-4 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete ft | 147 | 8.9% | 134 | 0-1 |
| Wet Circle mph | 5.4 | 8.3% | 5.8 | 0-1 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 44.8 | 6.7% | 47.8 | 0-1 |
| Snow Krisalp HP3 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking ft | 34 | 10.5% | 31 | 0-1 |
| Snow Traction lbf | 50 | 11.7% | 56 | 0-1 |
| Ice Krisalp HP3 ahead | ||||
| Ice Braking ft | 60 | 7.7% | 55 | 0-1 |
| Comfort Krisalp HP3 ahead | ||||
| Noise dB | 73.4 | 1.5 dB | 71.9 | 0-1 |
| Value Krisalp HP3 ahead | ||||
| Wear miles | 30,074 | 8.9% | 32,746 | 0-1 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.7 | = | 5.7 | 0-0 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 75 | 14.7% | 64 | 0-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 6 tests, 2017 to 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | SW608 | Field | Krisalp HP3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test | P26 of 31 | P7 of 31 | |
| 2024 Winter 55 Tire Braking Test | P34 of 55 | P16 of 55 | |
| 2022 Winter Tire Market Overview | P49 of 56 | P16 of 56 | |
| 2021 Winter Tire Market Overview | P39 of 50 | P11 of 50 | |
| 2018 51 Winter Tire Shootout | P28 of 52 | P6 of 52 | |
| 2017 50 Winter Tire Shoot Out | P30 of 50 | P10 of 50 |
SW608 vs Krisalp HP3: your questions
Is the Goodride SW608 or the Kleber Krisalp HP3 the better tire?
In the 6 independent tests that ran both tires, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 finished ahead 6 times and the SW608 not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the SW608 scores 2.8 and the Krisalp HP3 8.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the SW608 or the Krisalp HP3?
The Krisalp HP3 led 7 of the 7 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 8.9% shorter in the wet across 4 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Krisalp HP3 led 1 of the 1 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The Krisalp HP3 led 2 of the 2 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 6.8/10 for the SW608 and 8.8/10 for the Krisalp HP3.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the SW608 64% from 9 reviews and the Krisalp HP3 84% from 36. 56% of SW608 owners would buy it again, against 71% for the Krisalp HP3.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The SW608 is made in 58 sizes (13 to 20 inch) and the Krisalp HP3 in 75 (14 to 20 inch). 45 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the SW608 is graded C for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Krisalp HP3 B and D.
Which is the newer tire?
The SW608 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2019, the Krisalp HP3 in 2016. The Krisalp HP3 replaced the Kleber Krisalp HP2.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Barum Polaris 6 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
2-1 in 4 shared tests
vs
Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
5-10 in 15 shared tests
vs
Hankook Winter I cept RS3 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
5-3 in 8 shared tests
vs
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
13-5 in 20 shared tests
vs 
Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
0-11 in 11 shared tests
vs
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
4-18 in 22 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
8-1 in 10 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.