Nokian Hakkapeliitta R2 vs Michelin X Ice Snow
Ahead in each discipline
The Nokian Hakkapeliitta R2 and the Michelin X Ice Snow have met in one independent test so far, and the X Ice Snow finished ahead. The Hakkapeliitta R2 was stronger in value, the X Ice Snow in wet, snow, ice and comfort.
Performance profile
13 measurements from the one shared test, each tire shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
Hakkapeliitta R2
X Ice Snow
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 80%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
Hakkapeliitta R2
X Ice Snow
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Hakkapeliitta R2
X Ice Snow
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Hakkapeliitta R2 91% from 4 reviews and the X Ice Snow 85% from 19. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tires' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tire that did better.
| Measurement | Hakkapeliitta R2 | Gap | X Ice Snow |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Level | |||
| Dry Braking ft | 96 | 5.6% | 102 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | 2 | 100% | 4 |
| Wet X Ice Snow ahead | |||
| Wet Braking ft | 134 | 6.1% | 126 |
| Wet Handling s | 43.7 | 3.7% | 42.1 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 35.2 | 14.8% | 40.4 |
| Snow X Ice Snow ahead | |||
| Snow Braking ft | 42 | 4.1% | 40 |
| Snow Traction s | 4.6 | 0.7% | 4.57 |
| Snow Handling s | 80.7 | 5% | 76.7 |
| Ice X Ice Snow ahead | |||
| Ice Braking ft | 46 | 13.9% | 40 |
| Ice Traction s | 10.7 | 31.6% | 7.32 |
| Ice Handling s | 49 | 3.9% | 47.1 |
| Comfort X Ice Snow ahead | |||
| Noise dB | 75.5 | 1 dB | 74.5 |
| Value Hakkapeliitta R2 ahead | |||
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 4.8 | 6.8% | 5.15 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2023
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Hakkapeliitta R2 | Field | X Ice Snow |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Studless Friction Winter Tire Test | P7 of 8 | P4 of 8 |
Hakkapeliitta R2 vs X Ice Snow: your questions
Is the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R2 or the Michelin X Ice Snow the better tire?
The Nokian Hakkapeliitta R2 and the Michelin X Ice Snow have met in one independent test so far, and the X Ice Snow finished ahead. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Hakkapeliitta R2 scores 3 and the X Ice Snow 7.9 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Hakkapeliitta R2 or the X Ice Snow?
The X Ice Snow led 3 of the 3 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
Across the shared tests the dry measurements are split 1-1 between the Hakkapeliitta R2 and the X Ice Snow.
Which is better in snow?
The X Ice Snow led 3 of the 3 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 10/10 for the Hakkapeliitta R2 and 8.8/10 for the X Ice Snow.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Hakkapeliitta R2 91% from 4 reviews and the X Ice Snow 85% from 19.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Continental VikingContact 8 vs Michelin X Ice Snow
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Michelin X Ice Snow vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
0-6 in 8 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak Ice vs Michelin X Ice Snow
0-3 in 3 shared tests
vs 
Michelin X Ice Snow vs Pirelli Ice Zero FR
3-1 in 4 shared tests
vs
Continental VikingContact 7 vs Michelin X Ice Snow
5-0 in 7 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 vs Michelin X Ice Snow
7-0 in 7 shared tests
vs
Michelin X Ice North 4 vs Michelin X Ice Snow
1-1 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Michelin X Ice Snow vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
2-1 in 6 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.