Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Vredestein Ultrac+
Ahead in each discipline
The Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 and the Vredestein Ultrac+ have met in one independent test so far, and the EfficientGrip Performance 2 finished ahead. The EfficientGrip Performance 2 was stronger in value, the Ultrac+ in dry.
Performance profile
8 measurements from the one shared test, each tire shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
EfficientGrip Performance 2
Ultrac+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 90%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
EfficientGrip Performance 2
Ultrac+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
EfficientGrip Performance 2
Ultrac+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the EfficientGrip Performance 2 85% from 129 reviews and the Ultrac+ 83% from 8. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tires' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tire that did better.
| Measurement | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Gap | Ultrac+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Ultrac+ ahead | |||
| Dry Braking ft | 119 | 2.8% | 116 |
| Wet Level | |||
| Wet Braking ft | 103 | 7.7% | 111 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete ft | 125 | 3.5% | 130 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 47 | 4.8% | 49.3 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 11.2 | 2.9% | 11.5 |
| Value EfficientGrip Performance 2 ahead | |||
| Wear miles | 35,915 | 88.9% | 19,014 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.5 | 1.8% | 5.6 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 62 | 36.1% | 97 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Field | Ultrac+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 ADAC Summer Tire Test | P3 of 16 | P12 of 16 |
EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Ultrac+: your questions
Is the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 or the Vredestein Ultrac+ the better tire?
The Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 and the Vredestein Ultrac+ have met in one independent test so far, and the EfficientGrip Performance 2 finished ahead. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 9 and the Ultrac+ 8.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the EfficientGrip Performance 2 or the Ultrac+?
Across the shared tests the wet measurements are split 2-2 between the EfficientGrip Performance 2 and the Ultrac+.
Which is better in the dry?
The Ultrac+ led 1 of the 1 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.5/10 for the EfficientGrip Performance 2 and 8.5/10 for the Ultrac+.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the EfficientGrip Performance 2 85% from 129 reviews and the Ultrac+ 83% from 8. 81% of EfficientGrip Performance 2 owners would buy it again, against 71% for the Ultrac+.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The EfficientGrip Performance 2 is made in 37 sizes (15 to 21 inch) and the Ultrac+ in 57 (15 to 20 inch). 24 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the EfficientGrip Performance 2 is graded A for wet grip and A for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Ultrac+ A and B.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
5-2 in 7 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
9-0 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
7-4 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4+
2-5 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5
2-2 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
5-8 in 14 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
10-6 in 16 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy
3-1 in 4 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.