Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy
- TR Score
- 9.0/10
- Owners say
- 85% · 129
- TR Score
- 8.2/10
- Owners say
- 67% · 38
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tires, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 finished ahead 3 times and the e.Primacy once. The EfficientGrip Performance 2 stopped 8.3% shorter in the wet; the e.Primacy had 13.6% lower rolling resistance.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Pick Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 for drivers prioritizing wet safety and balanced dynamics (variable climates, family cars, spirited commuters). Choose Michelin e.Primacy for efficiency-first use-EVs/hybrids or high-mileage drivers seeking maximum range, low running costs, and longevity in predominantly dry conditions.
Where the EfficientGrip Performance 2 is stronger
- Class-leading wet performance: consistently shorter wet stops and better wet handling
- Strong aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved) with sizable margins
- Confident, precise handling and low external noise
Where the e.Primacy is stronger
- Lowest rolling resistance across tests-best for fuel economy/range
- Very high mileage and minimal abrasion (sustainability leader)
- Short dry braking distances and stable, quiet ride
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs e.Primacy at a glance
| Category | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Gap | e.Primacy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won4 shared tests | 3 | 1 | |
| Dry8 measurements | 5 | The EfficientGrip Performance 2 lapped the dry handling course 0.8% faster (2 tests) | 3 |
| Wet19 measurements | 19 | The EfficientGrip Performance 2 stopped 8.3% shorter in the wet (4 tests) | 0 |
| Comfort5 measurements | 1 | The e.Primacy was 0.5 dB quieter (3 tests) | 3 |
| Value7 measurements | 0 | The e.Primacy had 13.6% lower rolling resistance (3 tests) | 7 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.0/10 | The EfficientGrip Performance 2 by 0.8 | 8.2/10 |
| Owner rating129 and 38 reviews | 85% | The EfficientGrip Performance 2 by 18 points | 67% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 81% | The EfficientGrip Performance 2 by 46 points | 35% |
| Pricein the 4 tests that listed prices | Cheaper | The e.Primacy was dearer in 3 of 4 | +11.5% |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 37 | 26 sizes made in both | 64 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 4 tests, 2022 to 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Field | e.Primacy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tire Test | P2 of 7 | P3 of 7 | |
| 2025 AMS Sustainability Tire Test | P5 of 6 | P4 of 6 | |
| 2023 ADAC Summer Tire Test | P1 of 50 | P38 of 50 | |
| 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tire Test | P6 of 10 | P9 of 10 |
Performance profile
10 measurements from the 4 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
EfficientGrip Performance 2
e.Primacy
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 90%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 9 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
EfficientGrip Performance 2
e.Primacy
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
EfficientGrip Performance 2
e.Primacy
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the EfficientGrip Performance 2 85% from 129 reviews and the e.Primacy 67% from 38. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Gap | e.Primacy | Wins | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | 1.1% | 120 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 80.3 | 0.8% | 80.9 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 66.2 | 0.4% | 65.9 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 3.2% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 126 | 8.3% | 137 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 118 | 17.8% | 144 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 76.95 | 2.7% | 78.95 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 49 | 3.4% | 47.4 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 10.6 | 3.8% | 10.3 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 20.9 | 5% | 22 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 48 | 5.4% | 45.6 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 63.2 | 13.8% | 58.9 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | = | scored | 0-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 68.6 | 0.5 dB | 68.07 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 18.3 | 3.6% | 17.6 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 40,824 | 8.8% | 44,428 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 6.55 | 13.6% | 5.61 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.42 | 1.9% | 5.32 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 61.3 | 43.2% | 34.8 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 9 and the e.Primacy 8.2 out of 10.
| EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Category | e.Primacy | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75 | Dry | 71 | ||
| 75 | Wet | 42 | ||
| 86 | Comfort | 97 | ||
| 92 | Value | 97 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Category | e.Primacy | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Dry Grip | 7.5 | ||
| 8.6 | Wet Grip | 5.1 | ||
| 8 | Road Feedback | 6.6 | ||
| 8.4 | Handling | 6.2 | ||
| 9.1 | Wear | 8.2 | ||
| 8.5 | Comfort | 8.1 | ||
Owners rate the EfficientGrip Performance 2 85% from 129 reviews and the e.Primacy 67% from 38. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
- 85%from 129 reviews
- 81%would buy again
- 1,831,837 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners largely describe the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 as a quiet, very comfortable touring tire with standout longevity, reflected in the strong average score (81.1%) and the high share of positive reviews (90 of 113). Around four in ten owners specifically praise its tread life, and many also report confident dry and wet grip for everyday road use. The main reservation is that a noticeable minority (around one in five) find the steering feel a bit vague, and a smaller group mention a soft sidewall or occasional stability/feedback issues at speed.
- Low road noise for a touring tire
- Comfortable, supple ride over bumps and poor surfaces
- Excellent tread life and slow wear rate
- Strong dry grip with a safe, dependable feel
- Vague or less direct steering feel
- Soft sidewalls can feel imprecise or allow more movement in corners
- Wet braking can be underwhelming for some drivers
Summarised by AI from 113 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 129 EfficientGrip Performance 2 reviewsThe Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2’s were excellent. I like them so much that I’m onto my third pair across two cars. They improved my fuel efficiency significantly, were stubborn to wear away, all while providing reassuring grip whatever the weather. I’d driven over 40k miles on this set and have only just replaced them due to shoulder wear from needing an alignment. No doubt they’d have lasted over 50k miles otherwise! They’re not a budget tire but you soon recoup the added purchase cost through not having to replace as frequently and saving on fuel.
Michelin e.Primacy
- 67%from 38 reviews
- 35%would buy again
- 707,949 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners most consistently praise the Michelin e.Primacy for being notably quiet and comfortable, with many also reporting strong tread life and good efficiency. However, a meaningful share of reviewers (around half) complain about very weak wet grip, and around one in four specifically describe insecure wet handling, sometimes calling it unsafe on damp UK roads. In the dry it is generally seen as fine for everyday use rather than sporty, with grip and handling typically rated as acceptable.
- Low road noise for relaxed, quiet cruising
- Smooth, comfortable ride quality
- Excellent tread life and slow wear rates
- Respectable dry grip for everyday driving
- Poor wet grip with a lack of confidence on damp roads
- Unsettled wet handling, especially through bends/roundabouts
- Aquaplaning resistance reported as inconsistent
Summarised by AI from 32 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 38 e.Primacy reviewsOverall it was a nice experience. Towards the end of its life, the noise increased a bit and the grip noticeably worsened, especially in the last 5,000 kilometers. I used it in mixed conditions on all kinds of roads. The aquaplaning resistance in wet conditions was incredibly good. It was uncomfortable when pushed hard, but good for daily use. The price is a bit high. I used a Citroen e-C4.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 37 sizes of the EfficientGrip Performance 2 and 64 of the e.Primacy, 26 of them made in both.
| Category | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | e.Primacy |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| Sizes made | 37 sizes, 15 to 21 inch | 64 sizes, 14 to 20 inch |
| Made in both | 26 sizes 185/65 R15195/65 R15185/50 R16195/55 R16205/45 R16205/55 R16205/60 R16215/55 R16215/60 R16175/65 R17205/50 R17205/55 R17and 14 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A88%B12% | B95%A4%C1% |
| EU label rolling resistance | A53%B34%C13% | A99%B1% |
| EU label noise | 67-71 dB B52%A48% | 68-72 dB B90%A10% |
| On the market since | - | 2020 |
| Replaced | Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance (2021) | - |
| Awards | Highly Recommended: Best Tires for Large Family Cars (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Commended: Best Tires for Family Cars (DriverReviews, 2024/25) Winner: Summer Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2022) | Winner: Electric Car Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2023) Winner: Electric Car Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2022) |
| Price in the shared tests | The e.Primacy was the dearer tire in 3 of the 4 tests that listed prices, by 11.5% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This matchup pits two premium-touring summer tires with very different design priorities: Goodyear's EfficientGrip Performance 2 (EGP2) aims for balanced safety and comfort, while Michelin's e.Primacy targets maximum efficiency and sustainability. Across four shared independent tests from 2022-2025, both tires proved competent, but they diverge clearly in wet performance versus rolling resistance.
The data shows Goodyear consistently stronger in wet grip, handling and aquaplaning resistance-often by meaningful margins-while Michelin dominates rolling resistance, wear and overall efficiency. Dry performance is closer: Michelin frequently stops shorter in dry braking, but Goodyear tends to handle better and with more confidence. Pricing typically favors Goodyear, while Michelin offsets its higher purchase price with lower energy use and longer life.
Conclusion
If your priority is safety headroom in mixed weather, the Goodyear EGP2 is the safer all-rounder. It wins every shared wet category across tests, with standout gaps in wet braking (e.g., 37.4 m vs 43.7 m in ADAC, ~14% shorter) and aquaplaning resistance (often 6-25% better). It also delivers composed handling and low noise, and usually comes at a lower purchase price.
Choose the Michelin e.Primacy if efficiency and longevity are paramount-especially for EVs and high-mileage drivers. It repeatedly posts the lowest rolling resistance (up to ~17-21% advantage), very low abrasion, and leading predicted mileage, with quiet, comfortable road manners. The trade-off is weaker wet grip and aquaplaning performance versus Goodyear, though dry braking is often a Michelin strong suit.
Bottom line: Goodyear for confidence and safety in the wet without major efficiency penalties; Michelin for maximum range, fuel savings, and tread life if you can accept reduced wet reserves.
EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs e.Primacy: your questions
Is the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 or the Michelin e.Primacy the better tire?
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tires, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 finished ahead 3 times and the e.Primacy once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 9 and the e.Primacy 8.2 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the EfficientGrip Performance 2 or the e.Primacy?
The EfficientGrip Performance 2 led 19 of the 19 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 8.3% shorter in the wet across 4 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The EfficientGrip Performance 2 led 5 of the 8 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it lapped the dry handling course 0.8% faster across 2 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The e.Primacy had 13.6% lower rolling resistance (3 tests) and used 1.9% less fuel (2 tests). Owners rate wear 9.1/10 for the EfficientGrip Performance 2 and 8.2/10 for the e.Primacy.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The e.Primacy was 0.5 dB quieter (3 tests). Owners rate comfort 8.5/10 for the EfficientGrip Performance 2 and 8.1/10 for the e.Primacy.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the EfficientGrip Performance 2 85% from 129 reviews and the e.Primacy 67% from 38. 81% of EfficientGrip Performance 2 owners would buy it again, against 35% for the e.Primacy.
Which is more expensive?
In the 4 tests that listed prices, the e.Primacy was the dearer tire in 3 of them, by 11.5% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The EfficientGrip Performance 2 is made in 37 sizes (15 to 21 inch) and the e.Primacy in 64 (14 to 20 inch). 26 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the EfficientGrip Performance 2 is graded A for wet grip and A for rolling resistance in most sizes; the e.Primacy B and A.
More comparisons with these tires
vs
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
5-2 in 7 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
9-0 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
7-4 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4+
2-5 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5
2-2 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
5-8 in 14 shared tests
vs
Continental UltraContact NXT vs Michelin e.Primacy
2-0 in 2 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
10-6 in 16 shared tests
Every Goodyear vs Michelin test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tires →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion