Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy
The data shows Goodyear consistently stronger in wet grip, handling and aquaplaning resistance-often by meaningful margins-while Michelin dominates rolling resistance, wear and overall efficiency. Dry performance is closer: Michelin frequently stops shorter in dry braking, but Goodyear tends to handle better and with more confidence. Pricing typically favors Goodyear, while Michelin offsets its higher purchase price with lower energy use and longer life.
Test Results
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been four tests which compare both tires directly!
| Tire | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 | three | |
| Michelin e.Primacy | one |
While it might look like the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is better than the Michelin e.Primacy purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Key Strengths
- Class-leading wet performance: consistently shorter wet stops and better wet handling
- Strong aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved) with sizable margins
- Confident, precise handling and low external noise
- Generally better upfront value and competitive efficiency for a non-eco tire
- Lowest rolling resistance across tests-best for fuel economy/range
- Very high mileage and minimal abrasion (sustainability leader)
- Short dry braking distances and stable, quiet ride
- Lightweight construction and EV-friendly characteristics
Dry Braking
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin e.Primacy was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Michelin e.Primacy stopped the vehicle in 1.08% less distance than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Dry Braking: Michelin e.Primacy
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was 0.74% faster around a lap than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was 0.38% faster around a lap than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scored 3.08% more points than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during four wet braking tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 stopped the vehicle in 7.92% less distance than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Wet Braking: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 stopped the vehicle in 17.81% less distance than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was 2.53% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was 3.3% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 had 2.95% higher lateral wet grip than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Wet Circle: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during four straight aqua tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 floated at a 5.11% higher speed than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Straight Aqua: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during four curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 slipped out at a 6.7% higher speed than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 and Michelin e.Primacy performed equally well in subj. comfort tests.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Both tires performed equally well
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin e.Primacy was better during two noise tests. On average the Michelin e.Primacy measured 0.77% quieter than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Noise: Michelin e.Primacy
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Tire Weight
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin e.Primacy was better during one tire weight tests. On average the Michelin e.Primacy weighed 3.61% less than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Tire Weight: Michelin e.Primacy
See how the Tire Weight winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin e.Primacy was better during one wear tests. On average the Michelin e.Primacy is predicted to cover 8.11% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Wear: Michelin e.Primacy
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one value tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 proved to have a 3.47% better value based on price/1000km than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Value: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during two price tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 cost 21.24% less than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Price: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin e.Primacy was better during three rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin e.Primacy had a 14.35% lower rolling resistance than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin e.Primacy
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin e.Primacy was better during two fuel consumption tests. On average the Michelin e.Primacy used 1.85% less fuel than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Michelin e.Primacy
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin e.Primacy was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin e.Primacy emitted 43.23% less particle wear matter than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Abrasion: Michelin e.Primacy
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 Driver Reviews
Across 101 reviews, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is most often praised as a premium touring tire with outstanding longevity, strong day-to-day grip (dry and frequently wet), and a noticeably quiet, comfortable ride with good fuel economy. Many drivers report very high mileages with slow, even wear and stable motorway manners, making it especially popular for high-mileage commuting and taxi/fleet use. A smaller but recurring set of complaints centers on a soft sidewall feel (vague/"spongy" steering, tramlining or less confidence when pushed) and, for some users, increased or unusually high road noise as the tire ages; a minority also note weaker wet braking/traction than expected.
Based on 112 reviews with an average rating of 85%
Michelin e.Primacy Driver Reviews
Drivers report that the Michelin e.Primacy is quiet, comfortable, and notably efficient, with several high-scoring reviews praising its long tread life. Dry-road performance is generally fine for everyday driving, though not very communicative at the limit. However, a large share of mid-to-low scoring reviews cite seriously poor wet grip-especially in rain, colder temps, and standing water-leading to reduced confidence and occasional safety concerns. Overall sentiment is mixed, with strengths in efficiency and comfort offset by frequently reported wet-weather shortcomings.
Based on 28 reviews with an average rating of 65%
Conclusion
Choose the Michelin e.Primacy if efficiency and longevity are paramount-especially for EVs and high-mileage drivers. It repeatedly posts the lowest rolling resistance (up to ~17-21% advantage), very low abrasion, and leading predicted mileage, with quiet, comfortable road manners. The trade-off is weaker wet grip and aquaplaning performance versus Goodyear, though dry braking is often a Michelin strong suit.
Bottom line: Goodyear for confidence and safety in the wet without major efficiency penalties; Michelin for maximum range, fuel savings, and tread life if you can accept reduced wet reserves.
Key Differences
- Wet safety: Goodyear consistently outperforms Michelin in wet braking, handling, and aquaplaning (often by 6-25%)
- Efficiency: Michelin delivers markedly lower rolling resistance (≈2-21% advantage depending on test)
- Dry balance: Michelin often brakes shorter in the dry; Goodyear typically offers better dry handling feel/consistency
- Comfort/Noise: Both are comfortable; Michelin often measures quieter, Goodyear sometimes lowest external noise
- Longevity/Sustainability: Michelin leads on wear, abrasion, and eco credentials; Goodyear is good but not class-leading
- Value: Goodyear usually lower purchase price; Michelin recoups cost via lower energy use and longer life
Overall Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Michelin e.Primacy Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Footnote
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.