Michelin CrossClimate+ vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
Ahead in each discipline
The Michelin CrossClimate+ and the Michelin CrossClimate 2 have met in one independent test so far, and the CrossClimate 2 finished ahead. The CrossClimate 2 was stronger in dry, wet, snow and value.
Performance profile
6 measurements from the one shared test, each tire shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
CrossClimate+
Not ahead on any measurement here
CrossClimate 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
CrossClimate+
CrossClimate 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
CrossClimate+
CrossClimate 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the CrossClimate+ 83% from 120 reviews and the CrossClimate 2 80% from 173. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tires' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tire that did better.
| Measurement | CrossClimate+ | Gap | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry CrossClimate 2 ahead | |||
| Dry Braking ft | 118 | 5% | 112 |
| Dry Handling s | 82.17 | 2.1% | 80.43 |
| Wet CrossClimate 2 ahead | |||
| Wet Braking ft | 100 | 4.7% | 96 |
| Wet Handling s | 49.03 | 0.1% | 49 |
| Snow CrossClimate 2 ahead | |||
| Snow Handling s | 94 | 2.9% | 91.3 |
| Value CrossClimate 2 ahead | |||
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.66 | 1.9% | 5.55 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2021
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | CrossClimate+ | Field | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 VS Michelin CrossClimate+ | P2 of 2 | P1 of 2 |
CrossClimate+ vs CrossClimate 2: your questions
Is the Michelin CrossClimate+ or the Michelin CrossClimate 2 the better tire?
The Michelin CrossClimate+ and the Michelin CrossClimate 2 have met in one independent test so far, and the CrossClimate 2 finished ahead. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the CrossClimate+ scores 9.4 and the CrossClimate 2 9.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the CrossClimate+ or the CrossClimate 2?
The CrossClimate 2 led 2 of the 2 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The CrossClimate 2 led 2 of the 2 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The CrossClimate 2 led 1 of the 1 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.6/10 for the CrossClimate+ and 8.3/10 for the CrossClimate 2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the CrossClimate+ 83% from 120 reviews and the CrossClimate 2 80% from 173. 87% of CrossClimate+ owners would buy it again, against 73% for the CrossClimate 2.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The CrossClimate+ is made in 63 sizes (13 to 19 inch) and the CrossClimate 2 in 116 (15 to 22 inch). 50 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the CrossClimate+ is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the CrossClimate 2 B and C.
Which is the newer tire?
The CrossClimate 2 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2020, the CrossClimate+ in 2017. The CrossClimate+ replaced the Michelin CrossClimate. The CrossClimate 2 replaced the Michelin CrossClimate+.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
8-4 in 13 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
7-19 in 26 shared tests
vs 
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
3-9 in 12 shared tests
vs
Hankook iON FlexClimate vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
2-0 in 2 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
8-5 in 15 shared tests
vs 
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
8-0 in 8 shared tests
vs
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
1-9 in 10 shared tests
vs
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
6-9 in 16 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.