Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Cooper All Season
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tires, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 finished ahead 2 times and the All Season not once. The AllSeasonContact 2 was stronger in dry, wet and comfort, the All Season in snow and value.
Performance profile
14 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
AllSeasonContact 2
All Season
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 92%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
AllSeasonContact 2
All Season
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | AllSeasonContact 2 | Gap | All Season | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry AllSeasonContact 2 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 130 | 4.5% | 136 | 2-0 |
| Dry Handling mph | 70.6 | 0.9% | 70 | 1-0 |
| Wet AllSeasonContact 2 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 159 | 4.7% | 167 | 2-0 |
| Wet Handling mph | 51.4 | 0.4% | 51.3 | 1-0 |
| Wet Circle s | 16.57 | 0.4% | 16.63 | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 60.9 | 1.3% | 60.1 | 1-0 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 10.8 | 12.7% | 9.5 | 1-0 |
| Snow All Season ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking ft | 87 | 2.6% | 85 | 0-1 |
| Snow Traction lbf | 844 | 0.3% | 846 | 0-1 |
| Snow Handling mph | 39.1 | = | 39.1 | 0-0 |
| Snow Slalom ft/s² | 15 | 1.1% | 14.8 | 1-0 |
| Comfort AllSeasonContact 2 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 14% | scored | 1-0 |
| Noise dB | 71.4 | 0.4 dB | 71.8 | 1-0 |
| Value All Season ahead | ||||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 6.95 | 6.6% | 6.49 | 0-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 2 tests in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | AllSeasonContact 2 | Field | All Season |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 All Season Tire Braking Test - 30 Sets | P8 of 30 | P15 of 30 | |
| 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tire Test | P2 of 12 | P9 of 12 |
AllSeasonContact 2 vs All Season: your questions
Is the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 or the Cooper All Season the better tire?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tires, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 finished ahead 2 times and the All Season not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the AllSeasonContact 2 scores 9.5 and the All Season 8.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the AllSeasonContact 2 or the All Season?
The AllSeasonContact 2 led 6 of the 6 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.7% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The AllSeasonContact 2 led 3 of the 3 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.5% shorter in the dry across 2 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The All Season led 2 of the 4 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the AllSeasonContact 2 83% from 70 reviews; the All Season has no owner reviews yet.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The AllSeasonContact 2 is made in 140 sizes (15 to 22 inch) and the All Season in 81 (14 to 20 inch). 67 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the AllSeasonContact 2 is graded B for wet grip and B for rolling resistance in most sizes; the All Season C and B.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
10-15 in 26 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
8-4 in 13 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
15-1 in 17 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Goodyear Vector All Season 4
0-7 in 7 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2
9-18 in 30 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3
6-3 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
11-1 in 12 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport
2-4 in 6 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.