Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Ceat WinterDrive
- TR Score
- 9.4/10
- Owners say
- 88% · 9
- TR Score
- 9.4/10
- Owners say
- -
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tires, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 finished ahead 4 times and the WinterDrive not once. The Blizzak 6 stopped 7% shorter in the wet; the WinterDrive stopped 3.6% shorter in the dry.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Bridgestone Blizzak 6 for maximum wet-road safety, confident winter handling, and low RR-ideal for mixed, variable winters and enthusiastic drivers. Choose Ceat WinterDrive if budget and quietness matter most, roads are mostly cleared, and you accept weaker wet-handling reserves in exchange for excellent cost-per-km.
Where the Blizzak 6 is stronger
- Class-leading wet braking and aquaplaning resistance (e.g., −5-11% wet braking vs Ceat across tests)
- Consistently strong snow braking and handling with precise steering feel
- Lower rolling resistance with competitive wear (53-57k km projections)
Where the WinterDrive is stronger
- Outstanding value and cost-per-km (circa €380/set; best value score)
- Very competitive mileage and low fuel use in ADAC
- Quieter pass-by noise and strong ice braking in ADAC
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Blizzak 6 vs WinterDrive at a glance
| Category | Blizzak 6 | Gap | WinterDrive |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won4 shared tests | 4 | 0 | |
| Dry3 measurements | 1 | The WinterDrive stopped 3.6% shorter in the dry (2 tests) | 2 |
| Wet11 measurements | 11 | The Blizzak 6 stopped 7% shorter in the wet (4 tests) | 0 |
| Snow8 measurements | 6 | The Blizzak 6 stopped 1.1% shorter on snow (4 tests) | 2 |
| Ice1 measurement | 0 | 1 | |
| Comfort3 measurements | 0 | The WinterDrive was 1.1 dB quieter (2 tests) | 2 |
| Value5 measurements | 3 | 1 | |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.4/10 | Level | 9.4/10 |
| Pricein the 3 tests that listed prices | +46.2% | The Blizzak 6 was dearer in 3 of 3 | Cheaper |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 4 tests, 2024 to 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Blizzak 6 | Field | WinterDrive |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Autobild Winter Tire Test | P3 of 20 | P15 of 20 | |
| 2025 Winter Tire Braking Test - 52 Sets! | P6 of 51 | P19 of 51 | |
| 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test | P3 of 31 | P10 of 31 | |
| 2024 Winter 55 Tire Braking Test | P1 of 55 | P24 of 55 |
Performance profile
7 measurements from the 4 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Blizzak 6
WinterDrive
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 13 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Blizzak 6
WinterDrive
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Blizzak 6 | Gap | WinterDrive | Wins | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 146 | 3.6% | 140 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 72.6 | 1.9% | 71.3 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 128 | 7% | 138 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 120 | 8.1% | 130 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 50.4 | 1.6% | 49.6 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 6.5 | 16% | 5.6 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 12.46 | 1.8% | 12.69 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 47 | 5.5% | 44.6 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | 18.9% | 6.8 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 78 | 1.1% | 79 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 306 | 2.5% | 314 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 36.4 | 1% | 36 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 9.5 | 1.8% | 9.3 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 53 | 4.3% | 51 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | = | scored | 0-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 69.6 | 1.1 dB | 68.55 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 34,393 | 5% | 36,207 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.54 | 5.8% | 9.07 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.8 | = | 5.8 | 0-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 62 | 3.1% | 64 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Blizzak 6 scores 9.4 and the WinterDrive 9.4 out of 10.
| Blizzak 6 | Category | WinterDrive | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84 | Dry | 93 | ||
| 92 | Wet | 54 | ||
| 49 | Comfort | 71 | ||
| 67 | Value | 84 | ||
| 74 | Snow | 76 | ||
| 61 | Ice | 90 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Blizzak 6 | Category | WinterDrive | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.2 | Dry Grip | - | ||
| 9.2 | Wet Grip | - | ||
| 8.7 | Road Feedback | - | ||
| 8.9 | Handling | - | ||
| 8.3 | Wear | - | ||
| 8.6 | Comfort | - | ||
| 9.1 | Snow Grip | - | ||
| 9.1 | Ice Grip | - | ||
Owners rate the Blizzak 6 88% from 9 reviews; the WinterDrive has no owner reviews yet. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
- 88%from 9 reviews
- 75%would buy again
- 75,369 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 delivers excellent winter performance, with strong grip on snow and ice and confident climbing and cornering in cold, mountain conditions. Multiple reviewers describe it as very stable and among the best winter tires they've used. Overall sentiment is strongly positive across all reviews.
- Strong grip on snow and ice
- Confident traction in cold/mountain conditions
- Stable, secure feel
- High overall satisfaction as a winter tire
Summarised by AI from 5 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 9 Blizzak 6 reviewsI might be one of the first people to buy Bridgestone winter tires and I've never regretted it. I used them for 2 years, and now I'm thinking of switching to all-season tires, so I'll be looking for other options. After 40,000 km, the insides of the rear tires wore out; I think it's related to the alignment and balance, so I'll be replacing them.
Ceat WinterDrive
No owner reviews yet. Be the first to review it →
Sizes, EU label and lineage
| Category | Blizzak 6 | WinterDrive |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Winter | Winter |
| Replaced | Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 (2019) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The Blizzak 6 was the dearer tire in 3 of the 3 tests that listed prices, by 46.2% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This head-to-head puts Bridgestone's Blizzak 6, a premium winter touring tire with a sporty edge, against the value-driven Ceat WinterDrive. Across four shared tests in 205/55 R16 and 225/40 R18, the Blizzak 6 consistently finishes near the top (including an outright win in a 55-tire braking test), while the Ceat typically lands mid-pack.
The pattern is clear: Bridgestone dominates in wet and balanced winter capability, adding precise handling and low rolling resistance. Ceat counters with standout purchase price, very competitive mileage, quieter road manners, and a few niche wins (shorter dry stops in two tests, stronger ice braking in ADAC, and better snow traction in select metrics).
Conclusion
If you prioritize all-weather safety with an emphasis on wet security and confident winter control, the Blizzak 6 is the stronger, more rounded performer. It wins every shared wet and snow braking head-to-head, posts better aquaplaning resistance, and feels sharper to steer-translating to shorter stops and easier control when conditions deteriorate.
The Ceat WinterDrive delivers excellent value: a much lower buy-in, very competitive projected mileage, lower noise, and isolated strengths in dry stopping and ice braking. For budget-minded drivers in milder climates or well-cleared urban routes who still want solid winter capability, it's a pragmatic pick.
Bottom line: choose Bridgestone for best-in-class wet confidence and balanced winter prowess; choose Ceat for maximum cost-per-kilometer savings and quieter cruising, accepting weaker wet-handling reserves.
Blizzak 6 vs WinterDrive: your questions
Is the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 or the Ceat WinterDrive the better tire?
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tires, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 finished ahead 4 times and the WinterDrive not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Blizzak 6 scores 9.4 and the WinterDrive 9.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Blizzak 6 or the WinterDrive?
The Blizzak 6 led 11 of the 11 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 7% shorter in the wet across 4 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The WinterDrive led 2 of the 3 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.6% shorter in the dry across 2 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Blizzak 6 led 6 of the 8 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.1% shorter on snow across 4 tests.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The WinterDrive was 1.1 dB quieter (2 tests).
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Blizzak 6 88% from 9 reviews; the WinterDrive has no owner reviews yet.
Which is more expensive?
In the 3 tests that listed prices, the Blizzak 6 was the dearer tire in 3 of them, by 46.2% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
7-16 in 24 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
1-6 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Hankook Winter I cept RS3
6-2 in 8 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
5-9 in 15 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Michelin Alpin 7
5-5 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
0-11 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Dunlop Winter
3-1 in 4 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion