Menu

Goodride SA37 Test Results

Tire Reviews tests: 1 Tested 2015 to 2022 3 publications

Tested 3 times by independent publications, the Goodride SA37 averages a finish of 13th.

  • 3Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 13thAverage finish
  • 12%Field beaten on average
  • 3Publications

3 tests, 2015 to 2022

Share of the field beaten in each test, oldest to newest. Hover or tap a point for the test.
  • Test win
  • Second
  • Third
  • Average 12%
The latest test

2022 Tire Reviews UUHP Summer Tire Test P9 of 10

The mixed budget combination of Goodride and Star Performer created an unbalanced vehicle with unpredictable handling characteristics. Not Recommended.

Strong: Rolling Resistance Weak: Dry Braking, Dry Handling, Wet Handling Winner: Continental SportContact 7

Record by discipline

Where the Goodride SA37 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.

Record by discipline
Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 2 P12 of 15 16% -
Dry Handling 2 P11.5 of 15 18% -
Subj. Dry Handling 1 P13 of 20 37% -
Wet
Wet Braking 2 P10.5 of 15 30% -
Wet Handling 2 P13 of 15 13% -
Subj. Wet Handling 1 P17 of 20 16% -
Straight Aqua 2 P7 of 15 60% -
Curved Aquaplaning 1 P4 of 10 67% -
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 2 P8.5 of 15 52% -
Noise 2 P8.5 of 15 46% -
Value
Rolling Resistance 2 P10 of 15 53% 1

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 3 tests. Updated October 28, 2026.

The Goodride SA37 has repeatedly struggled with wet handling, steering response and stability. It finished 18th of 20 in the 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tire Test, with wet handling 17th and 10.1% slower than the best. Wet braking was 13th, 13.4% longer than the shortest stop, and dry braking 14th, 7.4% behind the best. Auto Zeitung criticised slow steering and dry understeer. Test World placed it 13th of 15 in 2015, describing difficult wet handling, slow dry steering and rear grip loss in emergency maneuvers, although braking was acceptable and noise low.

The 2022 Tire Reviews UUHP test needs qualification because it used a mixed Goodride and Star Performer combination. That setup finished ninth of ten and was Not Recommended for unbalanced, unpredictable handling; it cannot establish the behavior of a complete matching set. Aquaplaning resistance placed fourth in both disciplines, while rolling resistance led the field. That efficiency result is unusual against 19th of 20 for rolling resistance in Auto Zeitung 2020 and Test World's high-resistance criticism in 2015, and the mixed setup limits direct comparison. The older matching-model tests already establish the main concerns, independently of that later combination.

Performance Strengths

  • Road noise Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
    • Low noise praised in the 2015 Test World Summer Tire Test
  • Aquaplaning resistance Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
    • Mixed Goodride/Star Performer setup placed 4th of 10 in straight and curved aquaplaning, 2022 Tire Reviews UUHP test

Performance Weaknesses

Do owners agree with the tests?

Every tester write-up on the Goodride SA37 (3 tests) and 24 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.

Where they disagree

  • Wet grip weakness in 2 of 3 tests 9 praise, 3 criticise of 24 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Dry grip weakness in 1 of 3 tests 8 praise, 2 criticise of 24 reviews · Read those reviews

Raised by owners, not by any test of this tire

  • Value for money no test mentions it 7 praise, 0 criticise of 24 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Tread life no test mentions it 1 praise, 5 criticise of 24 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Vibration and balance no test mentions it 0 praise, 3 criticise of 24 reviews · Read those reviews

Flagged by testers, not mentioned by owners

  • Dry handling weakness in 2 of 3 tests no owner mentions it
  • Wet handling weakness in 2 of 3 tests no owner mentions it

Every test, newest first 3

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2022 1 test
P9 of 10 Beat 11% of the field

2022 Tire Reviews UUHP Summer Tire Test

Tire Reviews 255/35 R19 Tested by Tire Reviews

The mixed budget combination of Goodride and Star Performer created an unbalanced vehicle with unpredictable handling characteristics. Not Recommended.

StrongRolling Resistance WeakDry BrakingDry HandlingWet Handling WinnerContinental SportContact 7

2020 1 test
2015 1 test
P13 of 15 Beat 14% of the field

2015 Test World Summer Tire Test

Test World 205/55 R16

The Goodride SA37 is very unstable and are difficult to drive on a wet surface. In an emergency, the rear tires lose grip too easily. In the dry the tires are too slow in response to steering and the rear wheels again can easily go into a skid. Noise level is low, but the tires are relatively rigid. Also a high rolling resistance.

WinnerContinental Premium Contact 5

Back to the Goodride SA37 overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Goodride tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.