70%
- Honda FRV
- 205/55 R16 V
- Mostly Town
- Easy Going
Very weak on sides. I replaced them twice.Sometimes rolling when starting drive.
Continental Eco Contact 5 Owner Reviews
Review this tireWhat owners say summarised from 74 reviews
Driver feedback on the Continental EcoContact 5 is mixed overall. Many higher-scoring reviews praise its low rolling resistance/fuel economy, strong dry grip and braking, and in some cases excellent longevity. However, a large share of mid/low scores report poor wet and cold-weather traction (including aquaplaning and winter use), along with frequent complaints about road noise on coarse surfaces and a soft/vague sidewall feel that reduces steering precision.
What owners mention most counted across 73 reviews
Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.
Owner ratings averaged from 91 ratings
- Owner score 69%
- Dry Grip 79%
- Wear 74%
- Handling 69%
- Road Feedback 68%
- Comfort 68%
- Wet Grip 68%
Continental Eco Contact 5 Reviews - Page 6
Score spread across 71 written reviews
95%
- Alfa Romeo
- 185/60 R14 H
- 840 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
The first 1,350 km (840 miles) have been done with the brand new Eco Contact 5s, so these are my first impressions.
The dry grip is perfect. To such an extent that I was amazed at the speeds I could turn in without any signs of understeer (FWD car).
Wet Grip: Definitely better than my previous Eco Contact 3s, more than sufficient, again much higher cornering speeds than before. Also, no aquaplaning whatsoever.
Road Feedback: Excellent for my taste - a sporty car needs good feedback, and that's exactly what these tires do almost perfectly really. You always now what the tire is doing.
Progressiveness: Again almost excellent, when pushed to the limit the tires provide early warning of understeer.
I won't comment on wear yet since it's too early.
Comfort: Brilliant. Very quiet tires, they only pick a tiny bit of noise occasionally on truly rotten road surfaces (of which there are many in Greece). On motorways at 130 km/h for instance, they are much quieter than the Eco Contact 3s I had before.
Overall, up to now I would definitely buy those again, that's for sure. Very satisfied, great all-rounders.
The dry grip is perfect. To such an extent that I was amazed at the speeds I could turn in without any signs of understeer (FWD car).
Wet Grip: Definitely better than my previous Eco Contact 3s, more than sufficient, again much higher cornering speeds than before. Also, no aquaplaning whatsoever.
Road Feedback: Excellent for my taste - a sporty car needs good feedback, and that's exactly what these tires do almost perfectly really. You always now what the tire is doing.
Progressiveness: Again almost excellent, when pushed to the limit the tires provide early warning of understeer.
I won't comment on wear yet since it's too early.
Comfort: Brilliant. Very quiet tires, they only pick a tiny bit of noise occasionally on truly rotten road surfaces (of which there are many in Greece). On motorways at 130 km/h for instance, they are much quieter than the Eco Contact 3s I had before.
Overall, up to now I would definitely buy those again, that's for sure. Very satisfied, great all-rounders.
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
87%
- Ford Mondeo
- 205/55 R16 V
- 22,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
Bought these tires after running a softer compound tire of a different make, swapped to this make after problems with vibration from the softer tires. Dry braking was slightly worse, but not enough to be a problem. Grip when pushed was also slightly worse, but again, acceptable. However wet grip, wear and comfort all very good. The best aspect for me is that the tires wear evenly across the width compared to others I have had and they drive the same after 22000 miles / 35000 km and 18 months. They pick up a bit more noise on rough surfaces, but not too much that it bothers me. Overall slight improvement in fuel economy vs older softer tires.
Which tires do you drive?
Researching the Continental Eco Contact 5? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.
100%
- Fiat 500 Abarth
- 195/45 R16
- 9 miles
- Mostly Country Roads
- Spirited
Originally I was skeptical about fitting Eco tires on my car, but I decided to get on with the suggestion from many friends. So, last year I got 4 brand new Eco Contact 5s and just waited to see the results.
These tires are exceptional, my 500 Abarth is gripping and gripping in both wet and dry roads. The tires are 16 months old and they still have 4mm thread rear and 3,5mm front - which I think is remarkable, given my abusive driving style. The provide warning of understeer early and they are also very quiet. So far I haven't noticed a performance drop, they perform just as they did after they were "ran-in" for about 1,500 km - not even slightly less.
Would I buy them again? Simple answer, Definitely - thanks to everyone for the recommendation - some people still don't believe (wrongly so, as it turns out) the Eco 5s are that capable in a hot little car.
These tires are exceptional, my 500 Abarth is gripping and gripping in both wet and dry roads. The tires are 16 months old and they still have 4mm thread rear and 3,5mm front - which I think is remarkable, given my abusive driving style. The provide warning of understeer early and they are also very quiet. So far I haven't noticed a performance drop, they perform just as they did after they were "ran-in" for about 1,500 km - not even slightly less.
Would I buy them again? Simple answer, Definitely - thanks to everyone for the recommendation - some people still don't believe (wrongly so, as it turns out) the Eco 5s are that capable in a hot little car.
100%
- Alfa Romeo 145 1.6 Boxer
- 185/60 R14 H
- 4 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
Excellent
30%
- Fiat croma
- 225/45 R17
- 2,500 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Easy Going
I ordered ContiPremium contact 5 online because it was voted best tire by several.magazines. When they srrived I was tired and was in terrible hurry, my friend picked them up and I was exhausted after 1400 km of continuous driving, so I just drove to shop and had them changed. Next time on fuel station, I actually realized that I am driving on ContiECO contact i stead. It was too late to change them, sine I burned a full tank already. And this is what I can say after 3600 km on them - THEY SUCK!
1) I was driving trough warm April on Nokian WR D3,(winer tire) once with 1600 kg and a passenger in the car and fuel consumption was less than with this ECo garbage when empty (1.2 liters on 100 km)
2) They wander when I am driving, and loose corners. I wasn't sure what is going on so I took car to the shop to check wheel geometry, guy there showed me results - car was OK 100% but said I am not first with these tires to come with same problem.
3) they are by far loudest tires I ever had, including situstions when I had to drive with winter tires trough simmer. Awful!!!
4) They give poor feedback and so far they perform far worse in rain than totally worn out Pirelli Cinturato I had on my car before.
5) overall bad performance and horrible UNSAFE feeling I have when I drive them.
If I were single and didn't have a wife that would nag me crazy for doing it, I'd take them down and burned them hatefully in my back yard. Now i hope to sell them on classifieds and buy something else. I will NEVER AGAIN buy anything Continental makes because this for me is proof that they buy their titles (read:bribe) for published results. no other explanation.
We have 3cars in family and theese are tires on them:(summer/winter)(rate/rate)
Lancia Delta Nuova - Michelin/BFGoodrich - 5/5
Citroen C1 -Toyo/Yokohama - 4.5/4.6
Fiat Croma - Continental/Nokian - -2/5 ( yes, two points below zero)
I make 60-70 000 km a year, and I was till recently a president of a vintage car club (120 members) - so I know what I ama full tank already. And this is what I can say after 3600 km on them - THEY SUCK!
1) I was driving trough warm April on Nokian WR D3,(winer tire) once with 1600 kg and a passenger in the car and fuel consumption was less than with this ECo garbage when empty (1.2 liters on 100 km)
2) They wander when I am driving, and loose corners talking about.
DO NOT BUY CONTINENTAL TYRES! They are just overhyped marketed GARBAGE. I should listen everyone who was telling me not to buy them.
I throw ashes on myself now and admit my error, and will post this on so many places as I can!!!
1) I was driving trough warm April on Nokian WR D3,(winer tire) once with 1600 kg and a passenger in the car and fuel consumption was less than with this ECo garbage when empty (1.2 liters on 100 km)
2) They wander when I am driving, and loose corners. I wasn't sure what is going on so I took car to the shop to check wheel geometry, guy there showed me results - car was OK 100% but said I am not first with these tires to come with same problem.
3) they are by far loudest tires I ever had, including situstions when I had to drive with winter tires trough simmer. Awful!!!
4) They give poor feedback and so far they perform far worse in rain than totally worn out Pirelli Cinturato I had on my car before.
5) overall bad performance and horrible UNSAFE feeling I have when I drive them.
If I were single and didn't have a wife that would nag me crazy for doing it, I'd take them down and burned them hatefully in my back yard. Now i hope to sell them on classifieds and buy something else. I will NEVER AGAIN buy anything Continental makes because this for me is proof that they buy their titles (read:bribe) for published results. no other explanation.
We have 3cars in family and theese are tires on them:(summer/winter)(rate/rate)
Lancia Delta Nuova - Michelin/BFGoodrich - 5/5
Citroen C1 -Toyo/Yokohama - 4.5/4.6
Fiat Croma - Continental/Nokian - -2/5 ( yes, two points below zero)
I make 60-70 000 km a year, and I was till recently a president of a vintage car club (120 members) - so I know what I ama full tank already. And this is what I can say after 3600 km on them - THEY SUCK!
1) I was driving trough warm April on Nokian WR D3,(winer tire) once with 1600 kg and a passenger in the car and fuel consumption was less than with this ECo garbage when empty (1.2 liters on 100 km)
2) They wander when I am driving, and loose corners talking about.
DO NOT BUY CONTINENTAL TYRES! They are just overhyped marketed GARBAGE. I should listen everyone who was telling me not to buy them.
I throw ashes on myself now and admit my error, and will post this on so many places as I can!!!
100%
- Skoda Fabia 1.4TDi
- 185/60 R14 T
- 1,200 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
Excellent tires. Very good on any surface, a huge improvement over the Matador tires my car had before. The best part is the ultra low rolling resistance, the car can go further without any acceleration. I managed to break my old record of 4.1 l/100 with an impressive 3.3. Great tires, I will definitely buy Continentals next time.
90%
- Mercedes Benz A
- 225/45 R17
- Mostly Town
- Average
Great tires for A Class. Much improved driving experience. Highly recommended. Thanks to all for the recommendation.
91%
- Citroën C3
- 185/60 R15 H
- 16,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
Excellent all rounders, these grip well and have nice feel to them in all conditions, and my fuel consumption has edged up from 60mpg to 62mpg since changing from Avon ZV3 to these. Beginning to show wear on the front but so good on all other parameters I'm going for these again next.
59%
- Ford Fiesta Zetec S
- 205/55 R16 V
- 2,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
i bought these tires after reading numerous reviews on it.
initial feel of the tires were good, but after around 2000km, the tires became noise, the performance also detiorated. could it be luck? but i didnt enjoy my tires. swap them for Yokohama C drive.
initial feel of the tires were good, but after around 2000km, the tires became noise, the performance also detiorated. could it be luck? but i didnt enjoy my tires. swap them for Yokohama C drive.
97%
- Toyota Corolla
- 195/60 R15 H
- 800 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
Very balanced and comfortable tires and really ultra low rolling resistance.
94%
- Fiat Panda
- 175/65 R14 H
- 500 miles
- Mostly Town
- Average
I was disappointed when I found out that my new car was going to have eco tires as standard having used the original Conti Eco Contacts around 8 years ago and finding them dangerous in the wet. However, my plans to swap the eco tires were dropped after only a few miles.
In dry conditions, you can't tell you've got an eco tire under you. They perform just as well as the best performance tires I've used and in the wet they provide surprising grip, although not quite as planted as in the dry (like all tires I suppose).
The ride comfort is very good and the only potential criticism is slightly higher road noise than I'm used to but they're still far from the worst in this respect.
I can't comment on wear having only done 500 miles so far. Suffice to say, they still look like new!
In dry conditions, you can't tell you've got an eco tire under you. They perform just as well as the best performance tires I've used and in the wet they provide surprising grip, although not quite as planted as in the dry (like all tires I suppose).
The ride comfort is very good and the only potential criticism is slightly higher road noise than I'm used to but they're still far from the worst in this respect.
I can't comment on wear having only done 500 miles so far. Suffice to say, they still look like new!
No reviews match those filters.
Find your next tire
All tire testsThe latest Tire Reviews tests
- Oct 2026The BEST All Weather Tires for 2026/27 →
- Oct 2026All Season vs All Terrain Tires Tested: Do You Actually Need an All Terrain? →
- Oct 2026The BEST Winter Tires for 2026/27 →
Summer Tires
All Season Tires
Winter Tires
SUV and All Terrain Tires
Track Tires
Which tires do you drive?
You're reading real-world reviews from other drivers - add yours and help the next buyer choose the right tires.