These tires came with a brand new car but only last 17,000 miles, in less than 3 years. I drove the car vey gently in the city like last 20 years, checked the pressure regularly, did orations every year. However the Bridgestone tires are the worst in terms of duration. I ended up to buy another brand.
But the tires was quiet and comfy ride0\.

Sorry i cant give my ideal review.. Because im newbie here.. And this is my 1st car and tire.. 😁 😁

Comfortable & quiet tire. Starts to get noisy at 15000km.

Running for a total now of 16000KMs, daily at around 30kms on dry paved asphalt road mostly on a desert summer in Middle East with few occasions of rain, average 40KM/H.
A little bit noisy on high speeds 140-160 km/h, at 35psi front and 33psi rear after the first 10,000KM tire rotation.
No signs of wear so far. I had some few occasions of skidding and drift.

One of the best tires I've used so far. Perfect match for my Toyota Corolla. Managed to run for more than 40000km and still more that 1-2mm tire is remaining. Used to drive hard on the car and harder on the accelerator. Once Bridgestone and always Bridgstone. (Y). Cheers

I've been driving on budget tires for 10 years. 2 years ago, I decided to make a change and bought these. 2 years now, one is with 2mm thread and the other three were between 3 to 4.5mm. So with conservative driving and good alignments, they do last. In fact, if it wasn't for the 2 heavily broken ball joints, these tires could have lasted 40'000 miles. (Yes, I driven on 2 broken ball joints for 10,000 miles, wear out the front heavily, then I rotate the tires around.)

In terms of dry and wet grip. They were good, but I just somehow felt wet is slightly better than dry. Handling? I rarely test the limit of them, so I can't say. Comfort? Good initially, 2 years now, average I would say, since no tires can not resist ageing no matter their brands.

Would I buy again? Depends on the price. I mean, I drives a lot (15'000 miles town driving per year). Sure grips are important, but wear and tear is what I valued the most. At its current price (£81.56), I would rather get Michelin Energy Saver Plus (£83.99).

Done 25.000 Km . The tire is absolutely safe and durable . Ofcourse after 3 hot summers its becoming a bit more noisy . Changed to BFGgrip . Its more comfy ,still I think that the B150 had shorter dry braking .

A very decent tire for my little car . Safe , durable and economic in consumption. Becoming a bit noisy as time passed by. I changed to BFG ggrip .

A very noisey tire on certain road surfaces. Too soon to comment on any other characteristics. Only 3 months old and 450miles.

I was so disappointed with this Japan made tires...I m definitely wouldn't buy it again

Day to day the tire suits the car, with decent grip in both dry and wet conditions. At town speeds the steering feels direct but has little road feel. This becomes more acute when cruising at higher speeds on roads with curves and undulations.
The worst problem has been the rate of wear.
After 6000 miles the front tires have both lost a minimum of 2mm of tread across the full width of each tire and the outside edge of the nearside tire has lost 3mm.
The rear tires have lost 1mm generally but nearly 2mm on the outside edge of the nearside wheel. After a four wheel alignment showed the suspension was all within manufacturers tolerances, it was suggested that persistent high speed cornering around right hand bends was the possible cause!
A first example of such wear and suggested cause after 17 long term cars!
Suzuki's recommended 39psi at the front and 36psi at the rear, presumably to facilitate the incredible 66 mpg average we have obtained measured brim to brim, may well be part of the problem. Tire rotation is a short term remedy but long term a more enduring tire is needed such the legendary long lived Michelin products.

These tires are economical and ecological but on the wet road are really dangerous.
If you cross the limit of the grip, you cannot stop sliding. Wear is bad also.
I don't recommend.