Menu
Antares Ingens A1 View Gallery (1)

Antares Ingens A1

Antares Tires High Performance Summer

The Antares Ingens A1 is a High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

3.6
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
93%
Wet Grip
63%
Road Feedback
67%
Handling
77%
Wear
73%
Comfort
67%
Buy again
70%
3 Reviews
73% Average
33,500 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 50th)
Antares Ingens A1

Antares Ingens A1

Summer Budget
BETA
3.6 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Wet
72.2
2x / 1 test
Dry
46.6
1.8x / 1 test
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
60.3
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2021
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 3
Avg Rating: 72.9%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.72
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2021 53 Summer Tire Braking Test Auto Bild 2021 205/55 R16 50/53 2 metrics
All Tests
View Test Results
1
Tests
50th
Average
50th
Best
50th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
2021 53 Summer Tire Braking Test
205/55 R16 • 2021
50th/53
View Test Results

Questions and Answers for the Antares Ingens A1

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Antares Ingens A1. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Antares Ingens A1 Reviews

Given 90% while driving a Mazda 3 2.0 DISI (205/55 R16) on mostly town for 3,500 average miles
I purchased Antares ingens A1 last spring and really surprised how well they work. Solid in wet & dry conditions and been wearing very well. Should easily get 60k KM out of them. Pretty pleased for the amount of money I spent. Beats paying twice that for premium brands.
Helpful 610
April 11, 2018
Given 36% while driving a Fiat Punto 1.2 8v (185/65 R14) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
These tires are for dry tarmac roads. That's all you need to know. Ok, they are noisy, road feedback and wet grip are practically nonexistent, and their quality-price ratio is poor. Never again. The worst set of tires I've ever had - and I've driven over one million kilometres during 35 years.
Helpful 601
October 3, 2017
Given 93% while driving a Toyota Corolla (200/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 30,000 average miles
I really can't explain why anyone would leave bad feedback for these tires. We paid $350 tax included + install for four of the 205/55/16 for our Corolla and were blown away by the value. After 35KM the tires barely looked like they were worn. They worked great on dry or wet roads, but took them off before the snow came so can't comment on that.
Helpful 614
June 22, 2017

How would you rate the Antares Ingens A1?

Click a star to start your review

206 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Antares Ingens A1 Reviews

Rate the Antares Ingens A1