Menu

Test Charts / TopTireReview

2023 APAC Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/45 R18
Tires tested
6
Disciplines
12

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

3

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
118 ft Best
118 ft 0 ft
119 ft +1 ft
126 ft +8 ft
127 ft +9 ft
129 ft +11 ft

The difference between best and worst was 9.1% (11 ft ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
26.9 s Best
27.4 s +0.50 s
28.3 s +1.40 s
28.4 s +1.50 s
28.4 s +1.50 s
28.9 s +2.00 s

The difference between best and worst was 7.4% (2 s).

Subj. Dry Handling

Subjective Dry Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
7.4 Points Best
7.4 Points Best
7.3 Points -0.10 Points
7.2 Points -0.20 Points
7 Points -0.40 Points
6.9 Points -0.50 Points

The difference between best and worst was 6.8% (0.5 Points).

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
59 ft Best
60 ft +1 ft
62 ft +3 ft
62 ft +3 ft
63 ft +4 ft
65 ft +6 ft

The difference between best and worst was 11.4% (6 ft ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
26.1 s Best
26.3 s +0.20 s
27.6 s +1.50 s
27.7 s +1.60 s
27.8 s +1.70 s
28.2 s +2.10 s

The difference between best and worst was 8% (2.1 s).

Subj. Wet Handling

Subjective Wet Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
7.7 Points Best
7.5 Points -0.20 Points
7.5 Points -0.20 Points
7.3 Points -0.40 Points
7.2 Points -0.50 Points
7 Points -0.70 Points

The difference between best and worst was 9.1% (0.7 Points).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
48.2 mph Best
47.9 mph -0.3 mph
47.7 mph -0.5 mph
47.7 mph -0.5 mph
47.3 mph -0.9 mph
46.8 mph -1.4 mph

All the tires in the Straight Aqua test finished less than 3% apart.

Comfort

4

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
7.3 Points Best
7.15 Points -0.15 Points
7.15 Points -0.15 Points
7.05 Points -0.25 Points
7.05 Points -0.25 Points
6.65 Points -0.65 Points

The difference between best and worst was 8.9% (0.65 Points).

Subj. Noise

Subjective in car noise levels

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
7.25 Points Best
7.25 Points Best
7.15 Points -0.10 Points
7.05 Points -0.20 Points
6.9 Points -0.35 Points
6.7 Points -0.55 Points

The difference between best and worst was 7.6% (0.55 Points).

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
69.8 dB Best
69.9 dB +0.10 dB
70.4 dB +0.60 dB
70.4 dB +0.60 dB
70.7 dB +0.90 dB
71.2 dB +1.40 dB

All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Noise

Internal noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
71.7 dB Best
72.3 dB +0.60 dB
72.6 dB +0.90 dB
72.7 dB +1.00 dB
72.7 dB +1.00 dB
73.2 dB +1.50 dB

All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.8 kg/t Best $0
7.9 kg/t +0.10 kg/t $4
8.1 kg/t +0.30 kg/t $11
8.3 kg/t +0.50 kg/t $19
8.6 kg/t +0.80 kg/t $30
9.2 kg/t +1.40 kg/t $53

The difference between best and worst was 17.9% (1.4 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Bridgestone Turanza T005A uses about 15 gal ($53) more fuel than the Michelin Primacy 4 ST.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.