Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild Allrad

2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
235/60 R18
Tires tested
10
Disciplines
9

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
116 ft -18 ft
134 ft Best
137 ft +3 ft
140 ft +6 ft
140 ft +6 ft
140 ft +6 ft
141 ft +7 ft
142 ft +8 ft
142 ft +8 ft
148 ft +14 ft
149 ft +15 ft

The difference between best and worst was 28.2% (33 ft ≈ 2.2 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
61.4 mph +1.5 mph
59.9 mph Best
59.7 mph -0.2 mph
59.7 mph -0.2 mph
59.6 mph -0.3 mph
59.5 mph -0.4 mph
59.5 mph -0.4 mph
59.3 mph -0.6 mph
59.2 mph -0.7 mph
58.8 mph -1.1 mph
58.6 mph -1.3 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4.6% (2.8 mph).

Wet

3

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
151 ft -5 ft
156 ft Best
157 ft +1 ft
157 ft +1 ft
157 ft +1 ft
159 ft +3 ft
160 ft +4 ft
164 ft +8 ft
164 ft +8 ft
165 ft +9 ft
171 ft +15 ft

The difference between best and worst was 13.7% (20 ft ≈ 1.4 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
54.9 mph +0.8 mph
54.1 mph Best
53.7 mph -0.4 mph
53.7 mph -0.4 mph
53.6 mph -0.5 mph
53.4 mph -0.7 mph
52.9 mph -1.2 mph
52.4 mph -1.7 mph
52.4 mph -1.7 mph
52.1 mph -2.0 mph
51.8 mph -2.3 mph

The difference between best and worst was 5.7% (3.1 mph).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
49.9 mph +1.1 mph
48.8 mph Best
48.7 mph -0.1 mph
46.8 mph -2.0 mph
46.7 mph -2.1 mph
46.4 mph -2.4 mph
46.2 mph -2.6 mph
46.0 mph -2.8 mph
46.0 mph -2.8 mph
45.9 mph -2.9 mph
43.1 mph -5.7 mph

The difference between best and worst was 13.7% (6.8 mph).

Snow

2

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
88 ft Best
91 ft +3 ft
91 ft +3 ft
92 ft +4 ft
94 ft +6 ft
95 ft +7 ft
95 ft +7 ft
96 ft +8 ft
97 ft +9 ft
102 ft +14 ft
RefReference Summer
268 ft +180 ft

The difference between best and worst was 206% (180 ft ≈ 12.2 Car Lengths).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
32.7 mph Best
31.9 mph -0.8 mph
31.7 mph -1.0 mph
31.6 mph -1.1 mph
31.5 mph -1.2 mph
31.5 mph -1.2 mph
31.1 mph -1.6 mph
31.1 mph -1.6 mph
30.6 mph -2.1 mph
30.2 mph -2.5 mph
RefReference Summer
17.9 mph -14.8 mph

The difference between best and worst was 45.2% (14.8 mph).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
69.8 dB -0.70 dB
70.5 dB Best
70.8 dB +0.30 dB
70.9 dB +0.40 dB
71.4 dB +0.90 dB
71.4 dB +0.90 dB
72.4 dB +1.90 dB
72.7 dB +2.20 dB
72.8 dB +2.30 dB
72.8 dB +2.30 dB
73.6 dB +3.10 dB

The difference between best and worst was 5.4% (3.8 dB).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.66 kg/t Best $0
7.69 kg/t +0.03 kg/t $1
RefReference Summer
7.79 kg/t +0.13 kg/t $5
7.82 kg/t +0.16 kg/t $6
8 kg/t +0.34 kg/t $13
8.34 kg/t +0.68 kg/t $26
8.38 kg/t +0.72 kg/t $28
8.42 kg/t +0.76 kg/t $29
8.47 kg/t +0.81 kg/t $31
8.85 kg/t +1.19 kg/t $46
8.86 kg/t +1.20 kg/t $46

The difference between best and worst was 15.7% (1.2 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Achilles Winter 101 X uses about 13 gal ($46) more fuel than the Pirelli Scorpion Winter.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.