Laufenn S Fit EQ+ vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tires, the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ finished ahead 2 times and the Advan Sport V107 once. The S Fit EQ+ was stronger in wet and comfort, the Advan Sport V107 in dry.
Performance profile
11 measurements from the 3 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
S Fit EQ+
Advan Sport V107
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
S Fit EQ+
Advan Sport V107
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
S Fit EQ+
Advan Sport V107
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the S Fit EQ+ 87% from 11 reviews and the Advan Sport V107 73% from 25. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | S Fit EQ+ | Gap | Advan Sport V107 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Advan Sport V107 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 115 | 4% | 111 | 0-3 |
| Dry Handling mph | 72.8 | 2.2% | 74.4 | 0-1 |
| Wet S Fit EQ+ ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 116 | 0.4% | 117 | 2-1 |
| Wet Handling mph | 44.7 | 0.7% | 44.4 | 1-0 |
| Wet Circle s | 15.2 | 1.4% | 15.41 | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 49.4 | 0.9% | 49 | 1-0 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 8.7 | 24.5% | 10.8 | 0-1 |
| Comfort S Fit EQ+ ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 28.2% | scored | 1-0 |
| Noise dB | 74 | 0.8 dB | 74.8 | 1-0 |
| Value Level | ||||
| Wear miles | 19,312 | 15.5% | 22,301 | 0-1 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.7 | 18.1% | 10.62 | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 3 tests, 2023 to 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | S Fit EQ+ | Field | Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test | P14 of 20 | P19 of 20 | |
| 2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout | P12 of 52 | P14 of 52 | |
| 2023 Summer Tire Market Overview | P26 of 50 | P4 of 50 |
S Fit EQ+ vs Advan Sport V107: your questions
Is the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ or the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 the better tire?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tires, the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ finished ahead 2 times and the Advan Sport V107 once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the S Fit EQ+ scores 7.9 and the Advan Sport V107 8.8 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the S Fit EQ+ or the Advan Sport V107?
The S Fit EQ+ led 5 of the 7 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The Advan Sport V107 led 4 of the 4 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4% shorter in the dry across 3 tests.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.5/10 for the S Fit EQ+ and 6.3/10 for the Advan Sport V107.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the S Fit EQ+ 87% from 11 reviews and the Advan Sport V107 73% from 25. 91% of S Fit EQ+ owners would buy it again, against 54% for the Advan Sport V107.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The S Fit EQ+ is made in 74 sizes (15 to 20 inch) and the Advan Sport V107 in 137 (16 to 24 inch). 28 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the S Fit EQ+ is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Advan Sport V107 A and D.
Which is the newer tire?
The S Fit EQ+ is the newer design: it reached the market in 2021, the Advan Sport V107 in 2018. The S Fit EQ+ replaced the Laufenn S fit EQ. The Advan Sport V107 replaced the Yokohama Advan Sport V105.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
9-1 in 10 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
9-0 in 9 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
7-0 in 7 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
6-1 in 7 shared tests
vs
Continental SportContact 7 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
2-1 in 3 shared tests
vs
Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
3-2 in 5 shared tests
vs
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
5-0 in 5 shared tests
vs
Pirelli P Zero PZ5 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
1-1 in 2 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.