Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ vs Arivo Carlorful AS
Ahead in each discipline
The Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ and the Arivo Carlorful AS have met in one independent test so far, and the Quatrac Pro+ finished ahead. The Quatrac Pro+ was stronger in wet, the Carlorful AS in dry, snow, ice and value.
Performance profile
12 measurements from the one shared test, each tire shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
Quatrac Pro+
Carlorful AS
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
Quatrac Pro+
Carlorful AS
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tires' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tire that did better.
| Measurement | Quatrac Pro+ | Gap | Carlorful AS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Carlorful AS ahead | |||
| Dry Braking ft | 141 | 2.1% | 138 |
| Wet Quatrac Pro+ ahead | |||
| Wet Braking ft | 110 | 21.6% | 140 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete ft | 130 | 24.5% | 173 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 43.9 | 7.6% | 40.8 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 7.5 | 21.1% | 6.2 |
| Snow Carlorful AS ahead | |||
| Snow Braking ft | 31 | = | 31 |
| Snow Traction lbf | 50 | 3.1% | 52 |
| Ice Carlorful AS ahead | |||
| Ice Braking ft | 54 | 6.7% | 51 |
| Comfort Level | |||
| Noise dB | 71.9 | = | 71.9 |
| Value Carlorful AS ahead | |||
| Wear miles | 28,894 | 1.1% | 28,583 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.8 | 3.4% | 5.6 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 78 | 29.5% | 55 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Quatrac Pro+ | Field | Carlorful AS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 ADAC All Season Tire Test | P9 of 16 | P15 of 16 |
Quatrac Pro+ vs Carlorful AS: your questions
Is the Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ or the Arivo Carlorful AS the better tire?
The Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ and the Arivo Carlorful AS have met in one independent test so far, and the Quatrac Pro+ finished ahead. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Quatrac Pro+ scores 8.1 and the Carlorful AS 4.7 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Quatrac Pro+ or the Carlorful AS?
The Quatrac Pro+ led 4 of the 4 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The Carlorful AS led 1 of the 1 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The Carlorful AS led 1 of the 2 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.1/10 for the Quatrac Pro+ and 3/10 for the Carlorful AS.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Quatrac Pro+ 81% from 15 reviews and the Carlorful AS 39% from 1.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Quatrac Pro+ is made in 103 sizes (17 to 22 inch) and the Carlorful AS in 106 (13 to 20 inch). 54 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Quatrac Pro+ is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Carlorful AS C and D.
Which is the newer tire?
The Quatrac Pro+ is the newer design: it reached the market in 2023, the Carlorful AS in 2021.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
9-0 in 9 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
7-0 in 7 shared tests
vs
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
5-0 in 5 shared tests
vs
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
5-0 in 5 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
8-0 in 8 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Nokian Seasonproof 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
2-0 in 2 shared tests
vs
Viking Fourtech Plus vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
1-1 in 2 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.