Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 vs Continental IceContact 2
Ahead in each discipline
The Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 and the Continental IceContact 2 have met in 2 independent tests and the record is level at 1-1. The Hakkapeliitta 9 was stronger in ice and value.
Performance profile
5 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Hakkapeliitta 9
IceContact 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 97%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 4 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Hakkapeliitta 9
IceContact 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | Hakkapeliitta 9 | Gap | IceContact 2 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Level | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 140 | 1.8% | 137 | 1-1 |
| Wet Level | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 155 | 0.1% | 153 | 1-1 |
| Snow Level | ||||
| Snow Braking ft | 59 | 0.8% | 60 | 1-1 |
| Snow Traction s | 5.79 | 4.3% | 6.05 | 1-0 |
| Snow Handling s | 92 | 1.6% | 90.5 | 0-1 |
| Ice Hakkapeliitta 9 ahead | ||||
| Ice Braking ft | 34 | 4.1% | 36 | 1-1 |
| Ice Traction s | 3.97 | 0.5% | 3.99 | 1-0 |
| Ice Handling s | 73.5 | 1.5% | 74.6 | 1-0 |
| Value Hakkapeliitta 9 ahead | ||||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 5.72 | 12.4% | 6.71 | 2-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 2 tests, 2017 to 2018
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Hakkapeliitta 9 | Field | IceContact 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Vi Studded Winter Tire Test | P2 of 8 | P1 of 8 | |
| 2017 Autocenter Studded Winter Tire Test | P1 of 10 | P2 of 10 |
Hakkapeliitta 9 vs IceContact 2: your questions
Is the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 or the Continental IceContact 2 the better tire?
The Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 and the Continental IceContact 2 have met in 2 independent tests and the record is level at 1-1. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Hakkapeliitta 9 scores 8.3 and the IceContact 2 8.2 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Hakkapeliitta 9 or the IceContact 2?
Across the shared tests the wet measurements are split 1-1 between the Hakkapeliitta 9 and the IceContact 2.
Which is better in the dry?
Across the shared tests the dry measurements are split 1-1 between the Hakkapeliitta 9 and the IceContact 2.
Which is better in snow?
Across the shared tests the snow measurements are split 2-2 between the Hakkapeliitta 9 and the IceContact 2.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Hakkapeliitta 9 had 12.4% lower rolling resistance (2 tests). Owners rate wear 8.9/10 for the Hakkapeliitta 9 and 7.5/10 for the IceContact 2.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7/10 for the Hakkapeliitta 9 and 6.5/10 for the IceContact 2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Hakkapeliitta 9 78% from 11 reviews and the IceContact 2 82% from 2.
More comparisons with these tires
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.