Yokohama Advan Sport V107 vs Kormoran Ultra High Performance
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tires, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 finished ahead 2 times and the Ultra High Performance not once. The Advan Sport V107 was stronger in dry and wet, the Ultra High Performance in value.
Performance profile
10 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Advan Sport V107
Ultra High Performance
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 75%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
Advan Sport V107
Ultra High Performance
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | Advan Sport V107 | Gap | Ultra High Performance | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Advan Sport V107 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 108 | 8.3% | 118 | 2-0 |
| Dry Handling s | 66.99 | 3.6% | 69.47 | 1-0 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | 63.9% | scored | 1-0 |
| Subj. Road Score pts | scored | 12.3% | scored | 1-0 |
| Wet Advan Sport V107 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 99 | 19.9% | 124 | 2-0 |
| Wet Handling s | 78.95 | 7.7% | 85.53 | 1-0 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | scored | 81.3% | scored | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 46 | 2% | 45.1 | 1-0 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 52.6 | 11.1% | 47.3 | 1-0 |
| Value Ultra High Performance ahead | ||||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 9.8 | 19.4% | 7.9 | 0-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 2 tests, 2025 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Advan Sport V107 | Field | Ultra High Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 EVO Summer Tire Test | P4 of 9 | P9 of 9 | |
| 2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout | P14 of 52 | P40 of 52 |
Advan Sport V107 vs Ultra High Performance: your questions
Is the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 or the Kormoran Ultra High Performance the better tire?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tires, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 finished ahead 2 times and the Ultra High Performance not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Advan Sport V107 scores 8.8 and the Ultra High Performance 4.8 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Advan Sport V107 or the Ultra High Performance?
The Advan Sport V107 led 6 of the 6 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 19.9% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Advan Sport V107 led 5 of the 5 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 8.3% shorter in the dry across 2 tests.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Advan Sport V107 73% from 25 reviews; the Ultra High Performance has no owner reviews yet.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Advan Sport V107 is made in 137 sizes (16 to 24 inch) and the Ultra High Performance in 37 (17 to 20 inch). 16 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Advan Sport V107 is graded A for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Ultra High Performance C and C.
Which is the newer tire?
The Advan Sport V107 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2018, the Ultra High Performance in 2017. The Advan Sport V107 replaced the Yokohama Advan Sport V105.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
9-1 in 10 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
9-0 in 9 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
7-0 in 7 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
6-1 in 7 shared tests
vs
Continental SportContact 7 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
2-1 in 3 shared tests
vs
Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
3-2 in 5 shared tests
vs
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
5-0 in 5 shared tests
vs
Pirelli P Zero PZ5 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
1-1 in 2 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Review the Advan Sport V107 Review the Ultra High Performance
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.