Tested 2 times by independent publications, the Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 averages a finish of 16th.
2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tire Snow Test P20 of 30
The Yokohama Geolandar A/T4, a 3PMSF on-road all-terrain in LT construction, finished twentieth. Good snow braking was let down by weak snow traction, the same pattern as most of the LT tires in this comparison.
Where the Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 1 | P10 of 12 | 18% | - |
| Dry Circle | 1 | P9 of 12 | 27% | - |
| Subj. Road Score | 1 | P9 of 12 | 27% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 1 | P7 of 12 | 45% | - |
| Wet Handling | 1 | P9 of 12 | 27% | - |
| Wet Circle | 1 | P9 of 12 | 27% | - |
| Snow | ||||
| Snow Braking | 1 | P6 of 30 | 83% | - |
| Snow Traction | 1 | P23 of 30 | 24% | - |
| Snow Handling | 1 | P4 of 12 | 73% | - |
| Subj. Snow Handling | 1 | P20 of 30 | 34% | - |
| Ice | ||||
| Ice Braking | 1 | P16 of 30 | 48% | - |
| Ice Traction | 1 | P14 of 30 | 55% | - |
| Comfort | ||||
| Subj. Comfort | 1 | P10 of 12 | 18% | - |
| Subj. Noise | 1 | P9 of 12 | 27% | - |
Drawn from 2 tests. Updated October 29, 2026.
The Yokohama Geolandar AT4 has useful snow-stopping performance but less convincing snow acceleration and road manners in Tire Rack comparisons. In the 2026 snow and ice comparison it was sixth of 30 in snow braking, only 5.9% longer than the best, but 23rd in snow traction, 30.3% behind. Drivers rated its snow handling 20th of 30, while ice braking and traction were near the middle. The tire was tested in LT load range E construction, which matters when applying these results to other versions. In the 2024 on-road comparison it finished last of 12 overall, despite the fourth-fastest snow lap, just 3.5% behind the best.
Road weaknesses included dry braking, tenth of 12 at 42.98 meters, 11.9% longer than the best, and wet handling, ninth of 12 and 11.3% slower. Testers described sluggish steering, poor wet behavior and erratic ABS intervention. Comfort was tenth of 12 and subjective noise ninth, although the ride was described as firm but composed. There is an unusual conflict within the dry results: the dry-circle measurement is listed second of 12, while the testers described weak dry grip. That isolated measurement should not obscure the braking and steering limitations. Wet braking was closer to the middle, seventh of 12, rather than a clear strength.
stopped well on snow, in the top third for braking- 2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tire Snow Test (2026)
in the lower third for acceleration on snow- 2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tire Snow Test (2026)
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
The Yokohama Geolandar A/T4, a 3PMSF on-road all-terrain in LT construction, finished twentieth. Good snow braking was let down by weak snow traction, the same pattern as most of the LT tires in this comparison.
The Yokohama Geolandar AT4 finished last overall. A decent snow lap is not enough to make up for weak dry grip, vague steering and a noisy ride.
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Yokohama tires