- Lexus GS
- 235/40 R19 W
- 100 miles
- Mostly Motorways
- Spirited
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Owner Reviews
Review this tireWhat owners say summarised from 154 reviews
Owners broadly agree the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S delivers standout dry and wet grip, with over half mentioning strong dry traction and nearly half praising its wet confidence. Comfort is also a common plus for a max-performance tire, though noise is more mixed, with a noticeable minority finding it loud. Longevity gets a more divided reception: many report solid tread life, but around one in eight complain about faster wear or uneven wear, and a smaller group say performance drops off as it wears. A further recurring criticism is a soft sidewall feel, with around one in ten owners reporting less support or precision than expected.
What owners mention most counted across 154 reviews
Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.
Owner ratings averaged from 179 ratings
- Owner score 85%
- Dry Grip 92%
- Wet Grip 87%
- Handling 86%
- Road Feedback 84%
- Comfort 84%
- Wear 80%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Reviews - Page 12
- Audi rs3
- 235/35 R19
- 15,000 miles
- Mostly Country Roads
- Spirited
- BMW M3
- 265/35 R19 W
- 7,000 miles
- Mostly Motorways
- Spirited
The tires were ok initially.
Dry performance was not as good as PSS. Feels a bit weird on extreme driving.
Wet performance is better than PSS and cup 2.
However, after around 8000km of driving, the performance of the tires drop drastically.
For the next set of tires, if I am looking for longavity, I will go back to PSS. Will go back to cup 2 if looking for out right extreme performance types.
Which tires do you drive?
Researching the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.
- Jaguar XF
- 255/35 R20 W
- 1,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
- Audi S4
- 255/35 R19 W
- 2,000 miles
- Mostly Motorways
- Spirited
- BMW 3 series
- 255/35 R19 W
- 4,500 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
On race tracks or on roads that have the surface of a good racetrack, these tires are very good both wet and dry, the grip is very good in turns, the handling and response is way up there with the very best tires.
In fact the category of grip in turns is at the level of scaring the gee-bees out of me.
However, even on racetracks I have a little issue with the direction stability both in straights and turns, these tires have a tendency to make their own choices where they want to go when they hit something that is not totally flat.
Out on normal roads these tires loose big time with me, as others have stated here, they do make the car bounce around and ruin the stability of the ride, it is jerky.
When I hit bumps or irregularity on the road the car reacts with instability and sometimes shakes and jumps around, the car needs constant corrections and in high speeds there is no room for mistakes.
Compared to my OEM tires it is extremely little difference in feel handling and response but I did prefer my OEM tires, they had that little edge and they certainly did not bounce around and loose stability like the Michelin's.
Despite the very good grip, I give dry and wet grip only 7 points because of the bouncing and loss of stability, without that problem it would be easily maximum 10 points.
Not for me, not for my cars, there are better tires with more complete performance for normal roads and on track-days there are real race tires that will do the job better.
- Honda FK2 type r
- 235/35 R19 W
- 2,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
At slow speeds they are good, Comfortable and the starting is noticeably lighter, but that's whhe positivity ends I'm afraid.
At speed the tire is less responsive than the contact 6 and feels like the tire wall has a lot more give/flex. When the tire actually grips under moderate acceleration it kind of upsets the whole stability of the car. It's hard to describe what I mean by that to be honest. The grip while cornering and acceleration at the same time is not solid, firm and smooth like the contact 6, it's jerky.
My advise would be although the contact 6 will not last you long as maybe the PS4S will, it's a better tire and the OEM tire of choice for a reason.
- Renault Megane RS250 CUP
- 235/35 R19 W
- 2,000 miles
- Mostly Country Roads
- Spirited
The tire excells at slow - medium speed corners on low grip surfaces (either wet or low grip dry - old tarmac, very often met in Greece)
But the sidewalls are weak at high speeds (>120 kph)
The car is bounching - swaying upon the tires midcorner and the steering feels soft during sudden direction changes.
I really miss the "stiff" - "direct" feel of bridgestones.
Not buying again. Not for me.
- BMW M240i
- 245/45 R19
- 4,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
Totally different car, no tire shiver under full acceleration,
huge levels of grip, great lateral strength in side walls allowing
great handling through the corners, comfortable ride & different car when overtaking at high speed.
I had a 135i with P Zero tires on last car which were pretty good but these tires are on another level should also be great on a 135.
- Renault
- 235/35 R19 W
- 700 miles
- Mostly Country Roads
- Spirited
Compared to my previous rubber (potenza RE 050A), it is a totally different experience. In terms of outright grip, ps4s' are noticeably better in the dry and much much better in the wet. They are much better in terms of ride quality and comfort too..
BUT, bridgestones are definitely better when it comes to dynamic abilities, such as feedback , turn in, steering response and linearity to your inputs under pressure (above 8/10 ) even though comfort is suffering on bad surfaces.
Michelin hasn't solved the "soft sidewall issue" of pss even though ps4s has been improved just a little bit. On the other hand, due to the sidewall deformation (variable patch technology etc) they provide such tremendous grip almost everywhere. You can't have it all...
In conclusion: Ps4s for top grip and ride comfort - Bridgestones for max driver's pleasure, especially if he loves “off balance†driving.
- Jaguar F Type coupe
- 305/30 R20
- 4,000 miles
- Mostly Country Roads
- Spirited
- Jaguar XF S
- 255/35 R20
- 1,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
I don't feel that they suit the car. The road noise is no better (actually a bit worse over concrete sections of the motorway), comfort is improved a touch and MPG is a little worse. With a cruiser like the XFS noise, comfort and MPG would be better.
Wish I'd of gone for Goodyear Asym 3's, they'd be more comfortable, better economy and quieter while still retaining 95% of the grip (although not the handling from what I've read), however if I had an XFR (or XFR-S) the Michelin's would be the way to go. The V8 noise would help drown out the tire noise, and would really benefit from the improved grip.
My XFS will be getting Goodyear's next time, my XK Dynamic R will be getting Michelin's (against the OEM Pirelli).
No reviews match those filters.
Find your next tire
All tire testsThe latest Tire Reviews tests
- Oct 2026The BEST All Weather Tires for 2026/27 →
- Oct 2026All Season vs All Terrain Tires Tested: Do You Actually Need an All Terrain? →
- Oct 2026The BEST Winter Tires for 2026/27 →
Summer Tires
All Season Tires
Winter Tires
SUV and All Terrain Tires
Track Tires
Which tires do you drive?
You're reading real-world reviews from other drivers - add yours and help the next buyer choose the right tires.

