Menu

Lassa Competus Winter 2 Test Results

2025 1 publication

Tested 1 times by independent publications, the Lassa Competus Winter 2 averages a finish of 4th.

  • 1Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 4thAverage finish
  • 50%Field beaten on average
  • 1Publications
Lassa Competus Winter 2

1 test in 2025

The latest test

2025 Autozurnal Winter Tire Test P4 of 7

The Lassa Competus Winter 2+ earned fourth place overall, with its most impressive results occurring in wet conditions. It was the second-best tire in the wet category, achieving a second-place finish in longitudinal aquaplaning and third-place results in wet braking and handling. Its performance on other surfaces was mixed; on dry pavement, it had the longest braking distance and was the loudest tire, yet it managed the third-fastest handling time. The tire's weakness was on snow, where it placed sixth, held back by poor results in the acceleration and braking tests.

Strong: Straight Aqua Weak: Dry Braking, Snow Braking, Snow Traction, Noise Winner: Michelin Alpin 7

Record by discipline

Where the Lassa Competus Winter 2 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.

Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 1 P7 of 7 0% -
Dry Handling 1 P3 of 7 67% -
Wet
Wet Braking 1 P3 of 7 67% -
Wet Handling 1 P3 of 7 67% -
Wet Circle 1 P4 of 7 50% -
Straight Aqua 1 P2 of 7 83% -
Curved Aquaplaning 1 P5 of 7 33% -
Snow
Snow Braking 1 P6 of 7 17% -
Snow Traction 1 P7 of 7 0% -
Snow Handling 1 P4 of 7 50% -
Comfort
Noise 1 P7 of 7 0% -
Value
Rolling Resistance 1 P4 of 7 50% -

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 1 tests. Updated October 29, 2026.

The Lassa Competus Winter 2 test record consists of fourth place among seven tires in the 2025 Autozurnal winter test in 215/65 R17. The article identifies the tested version as Winter 2+, so its results should not automatically be assumed identical for the original model. Wet-road performance was the better part of that assessment: third in braking at 55.4 m, 5.7% longer than the best, and third in handling, 2.3% off the fastest lap. Straight aquaplaning was second, although curved aquaplaning was less competitive at fifth.

The dry-road picture was mixed: handling was third, only 0.8% slower than the best, but braking was last at 48.3 m, 7.6% longer than the shortest stop. Snow traction was also last, 7.4% behind the best, while snow braking was sixth, 6.1% longer. The testers singled out those snow limitations and the highest noise level, measured at 73.8 dB, against the favorable wet results. Snow handling was closer to the middle at fourth, 1.3% off the best, so snow weakness was concentrated in acceleration and stopping rather than every discipline. With only one test, there is no basis for judging how consistently this balance carries across sizes or conditions.

Performance Strengths

  • Wet braking Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • 3rd of 7, 5.7% longer than best, 2025 Autozurnal winter test, article identifies Winter 2+
  • Wet handling Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • 3rd of 7, 2.3% from best, 2025 Autozurnal winter test, Winter 2+
  • Aquaplaning resistance Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • 2nd of 7 straight, but 5th of 7 curved, 2025 Autozurnal winter test, Winter 2+
  • Dry handling Minor
    Details
    • 3rd of 7, 0.8% from best, 2025 Autozurnal winter test, Winter 2+

Performance Weaknesses

  • Dry braking Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • 7th of 7, 7.6% longer than best, 2025 Autozurnal winter test, Winter 2+
  • Snow traction Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • 7th of 7, 7.4% from best, 2025 Autozurnal winter test, Winter 2+
  • Snow braking Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • 6th of 7, 6.1% longer than best, 2025 Autozurnal winter test, Winter 2+
  • Road noise Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • 7th of 7, 73.8 dB, 2025 Autozurnal winter test, Winter 2+

Every test, newest first 1

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2025 1 test
P4 of 7 Beat 50% of the field

2025 Autozurnal Winter Tire Test

Autozurnal 215/65 R17

The Lassa Competus Winter 2+ earned fourth place overall, with its most impressive results occurring in wet conditions. It was the second-best tire in the wet category, achieving a second-place finish in longitudinal aquaplaning and third-place results in wet braking and handling. Its performance on other surfaces was mixed; on dry pavement, it had the longest braking distance and was the loudest tire, yet it managed the third-fastest handling time. The tire's weakness was on snow, where it placed sixth, held back by poor results in the acceleration and braking tests.

StrongStraight Aqua WeakDry BrakingSnow BrakingSnow TractionNoise WinnerMichelin Alpin 7

Back to the Lassa Competus Winter 2 overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Lassa tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.