Menu

GT Radial IcePro 3 Test Results

2020 1 publication

Tested 1 times by independent publications, the GT Radial IcePro 3 averages a finish of 8th.

  • 1Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 8thAverage finish
  • 0%Field beaten on average
  • 1Publications

1 test in 2020

The latest test

2020 Studded Winter Tire Test P8 of 8

Strong: Dry Braking, Wet Braking, Wet Handling, Straight Aqua Weak: Subj. Dry Handling, Snow Braking, Snow Traction, Snow Handling, Ice Braking, Ice Traction, Ice Handling, Fuel Consumption Winner: Michelin X Ice North 4

Record by discipline

Where the GT Radial IcePro 3 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.

Record by discipline
Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 1 P1 of 8 100% 1
Subj. Dry Handling 1 P7 of 8 14% -
Wet
Wet Braking 1 P1 of 8 100% 1
Wet Handling 1 P1 of 8 100% 1
Straight Aqua 1 P2 of 8 86% -
Snow
Snow Braking 1 P8 of 8 0% -
Snow Traction 1 P7 of 8 14% -
Snow Handling 1 P8 of 8 0% -
Ice
Ice Braking 1 P8 of 8 0% -
Ice Traction 1 P8 of 8 0% -
Ice Handling 1 P8 of 8 0% -
Comfort
Subj. Noise 1 P5 of 8 43% -
Value
Fuel Consumption 1 P8 of 8 0% -

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 1 tests. Updated October 28, 2026.

The GT Radial IcePro 3 finished last of eight in the 2020 Vi Bilagare Studded Winter Tire Test, despite leading several dry and wet disciplines. Dry braking was first at 28.88 meters and wet braking first at 33.87 meters, matching the testers' praise for stopping performance. It also set the quickest wet handling time, 43.11 seconds, and placed second for straight-line aquaplaning resistance, only 0.8% behind the best. This is a single comparison in 205/60 R16, so those results do not establish a record across several tests.

Snow and especially ice performance explain the weak overall finish. Snow braking and handling were both eighth, although the braking deficit was just 2.2%; snow traction placed seventh, 5.8% behind the best. Ice braking, traction and handling were all last, with much larger deficits of 54.8%, 74.1% and 19.9% respectively. The testers criticised snow and ice grip and handling at the limit, while subjective dry handling also ranked seventh despite the short braking distance. Fuel consumption was highest in the field, 2.1% above the lowest result. Its wet-road strengths therefore came with substantial compromises in the winter conditions central to this test.

Performance Strengths

  • Dry braking Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • 1st of 8 at 28.88 m, 2020 Vi Bilagare Studded Winter Tire Test
  • Wet braking Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • 1st of 8 at 33.87 m, 2020 Vi Bilagare Studded Winter Tire Test
  • Wet handling Minor
    Details
    • 1st of 8 at 43.11 s, 2020 Vi Bilagare Studded Winter Tire Test
  • Aquaplaning resistance Minor
    Details
    • 2nd of 8 in straight aquaplaning, 0.8% behind best, 2020 Vi Bilagare Studded Winter Tire Test

Performance Weaknesses

  • Ice grip Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • 8th of 8 in ice braking, traction and handling, 2020 Vi Bilagare Studded Winter Tire Test
    • Ice braking 54.8% longer and traction time 74.1% slower than best in the same test
  • Snow handling Minor
    Details
    • 8th of 8, 5.6% slower than best, 2020 Vi Bilagare Studded Winter Tire Test
  • Snow traction Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • 7th of 8, 5.8% slower than best, 2020 Vi Bilagare Studded Winter Tire Test
  • Behavior at the limit Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • Testers criticised handling at the limit, 2020 Vi Bilagare Studded Winter Tire Test
  • Rolling resistance Minor
    Details
    • Highest fuel consumption of 8, 5.78 l/100 km, 2.1% above lowest, 2020 Vi Bilagare Studded Winter Tire Test

Every test, newest first 1

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2020 1 test
P8 of 8 Beat 0% of the field

2020 Studded Winter Tire Test

Vi Bilagare 205/60 R16

StrongDry BrakingWet BrakingWet HandlingStraight Aqua WeakSubj. Dry HandlingSnow BrakingSnow TractionSnow HandlingIce BrakingIce TractionIce HandlingFuel Consumption WinnerMichelin X Ice North 4

Back to the GT Radial IcePro 3 overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All GT Radial tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.