Menu

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 Test Results

Tested 2022 to 2025 3 publications

Tested 3 times by independent publications, the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 averages a finish of 5th.

  • 3Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 5thAverage finish
  • 31%Field beaten on average
  • 3Publications

3 tests, 2022 to 2025

Share of the field beaten in each test, oldest to newest. Hover or tap a point for the test.
  • Test win
  • Second
  • Third
  • Average 31%
The latest test

2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tire Test P6 of 7Nordic Friction Winter Tires

The Falken Winterpeak F-Snow 1 lacks the ice grip that the best tires have, performing adequately on snow but struggling on ice. In other respects, it delivers mediocre performance where wet roads present particularly large problems. This Nordic friction tire from Falken, also produced in Turkey, simply cannot match the winter performance of the category leaders. The wet performance is disappointing for a tire that should handle these conditions reasonably well as a Nordic friction offering. Comfort and stability are adequate but nothing special, with comfort among the lowest in its class. Aquaplaning resistance is only mid-table among the Nordic friction tires, and it rolls the most heavily of them, impacting fuel efficiency. The overall impression is of a tire that attempts to compete in the Nordic friction category but lacks the development refinement of Continental, Goodyear, and Pirelli's offerings. While it avoids any catastrophic failings, it also lacks any standout qualities that would recommend it over the established leaders. For a manufacturer trying to break into this specialized category, more development work is clearly needed.

Weak: Subj. Wet Handling, Subj. Comfort, Fuel Consumption Winner: Continental VikingContact 8

Record by discipline

Where the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.

Record by discipline
Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 2 P1.5 of 7.5 93% 1
Subj. Dry Handling 2 P6 of 7.5 24% -
Wet
Wet Braking 2 P2.5 of 7.5 79% 1
Wet Handling 2 P5 of 7.5 38% -
Subj. Wet Handling 2 P5.5 of 7 25% -
Straight Aqua 2 P4.5 of 7.5 46% -
Snow
Snow Braking 2 P5 of 7.5 37% -
Snow Traction 2 P2 of 7.5 85% -
Snow Handling 1 P2 of 8 86% -
Subj. Snow Handling 1 P5 of 7 33% -
Ice
Ice Braking 2 P4 of 7.5 55% -
Ice Traction 2 P3.5 of 7.5 61% -
Ice Handling 1 P3 of 8 71% -
Subj. Ice Handling 1 P5 of 7 33% -
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 1 P6 of 7 17% -
Subj. Noise 1 P3 of 7 67% -
Noise 1 P3 of 8 71% -
Value
Rolling Resistance 1 P7 of 8 14% -
Fuel Consumption 1 P7 of 7 0% -

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 3 tests. Updated October 29, 2026.

The Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 combines short dry stopping distances with slow steering and relatively high energy use against other Nordic friction tires. Vi Bilagare's 2022 SUV test put dry braking second of eight, snow traction second and noise third, but dry handling seventh and rolling resistance seventh. Tekniikan Maailma in 2025 found joint-shortest dry and wet braking within its seven-tire Nordic class, with second for snow traction, yet slow, imprecise asphalt steering. Teknikens Varld in 2025 ranked it sixth of seven in that class, with the highest fuel consumption and sixth for wet handling and comfort.

Winter handling is unusually inconsistent. Vi Bilagare placed snow handling second in 2022 and praised a steady rear end, whereas Tekniikan Maailma found sharp slides at both ends on snow in 2025. Ice feedback also reverses unusually: the Finnish 2025 test praised predictable grip and placed ice braking third of seven, while Teknikens Varld criticised ice grip and placed its subjective ice handling fifth of seven. The latter's wet-handling weakness should be distinguished from the Finnish test's strong wet braking; they assess different abilities. Overall finishes of fifth of eight in 2022 and fifth and sixth of seven in the two 2025 Nordic classes reflect these compromises.

Performance Strengths

  • Dry braking Strong in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
    • 2022 Vi Bilagare: second of eight, 33.59 m, 0.9% longer than the shortest stop.
    • 2025 Tekniikan Maailma: joint-shortest dry braking in the Nordic friction class, 30.8 m.
  • Snow traction Strong in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
    • 2022 Vi Bilagare: second of eight, 1.1% behind the best.
    • 2025 Tekniikan Maailma: second of seven Nordic friction tires, 1.7% behind the best.
  • Road noise Strong in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
    • 2022 Vi Bilagare: third of eight for measured noise, 75.1 dB.
    • 2025 Tekniikan Maailma: subjective noise third of seven in the Nordic friction class.
  • Wet braking Minor
    Details
    • 2025 Tekniikan Maailma: joint-shortest wet braking in the Nordic friction class, 37.5 m.
    • 2022 Vi Bilagare: fourth of eight, 5.4% longer than the shortest stop.

Performance Weaknesses

  • Steering feel Strong in 2 of 3 tests
    Details
    • 2022 Vi Bilagare: slow steering reactions and numb feel on asphalt, subjective dry handling seventh of eight.
    • 2025 Tekniikan Maailma: slow, imprecise steering in evasive maneuvers.
  • Rolling resistance Strong in 2 of 3 tests
    Details
    • 2022 Vi Bilagare: rolling resistance seventh of eight, 10.9% above the best.
    • 2025 Teknikens Varld: highest fuel consumption among seven Nordic friction tires, 4.6% above the best.
  • Wet handling Moderate in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
    • 2025 Teknikens Varld: subjective wet handling sixth of seven Nordic friction tires.
    • 2025 Tekniikan Maailma: wet lap fifth of seven in class, 3.8% longer than the fastest.
    • 2022 Vi Bilagare: wet lap fifth of eight; testers described strong understeer in wet corners.
  • Snow handling Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
    • 2025 Tekniikan Maailma: restless on snow, with sharp slides at both ends.
    • Unusually at odds with second-of-eight snow handling and praise for a steady rear end in 2022 Vi Bilagare.
  • Ice grip Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
    • 2025 Teknikens Varld: ice grip criticised, subjective ice handling fifth of seven in the Nordic class.
    • Unusually contrary to predictable ice grip and third-of-seven ice braking in 2025 Tekniikan Maailma.
  • Dry handling Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
  • Wet grip Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
  • Behavior at the limit Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details

Every test, newest first 3

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2025 2 tests
P6 of 7 Nordic Friction Winter Tires Beat 17% of the field

2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tire Test

Teknikens Varld 235/45 R18

The Falken Winterpeak F-Snow 1 lacks the ice grip that the best tires have, performing adequately on snow but struggling on ice. In other respects, it delivers mediocre performance where wet roads present particularly large problems. This Nordic friction tire from Falken, also produced in Turkey, simply cannot match the winter performance of the category leaders. The wet performance is disappointing for a tire that should handle these conditions reasonably well as a Nordic friction offering. Comfort and stability are adequate but nothing special, with comfort among the lowest in its class. Aquaplaning resistance is only mid-table among the Nordic friction tires, and it rolls the most heavily of them, impacting fuel efficiency. The overall impression is of a tire that attempts to compete in the Nordic friction category but lacks the development refinement of Continental, Goodyear, and Pirelli's offerings. While it avoids any catastrophic failings, it also lacks any standout qualities that would recommend it over the established leaders. For a manufacturer trying to break into this specialized category, more development work is clearly needed.

WeakSubj. Wet HandlingSubj. ComfortFuel Consumption WinnerContinental VikingContact 8

P5 of 7 Nordic Friction Winter Tires Beat 33% of the field

2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tire Test

Tekniikan Maailma 205/55 R16

The Falken Winterpeak F-Snow 1 grips well on ice, exhibiting predictable understeer in extreme situations without any sudden loss of rear grip. However, its behavior on snowy roads is more restless, where both the front and rear tires can begin to skid sharply. On asphalt, the tire steers slowly and imprecisely during evasive maneuvers, and the front tires may lose grip in the most difficult situations.

StrongDry BrakingWet BrakingSnow Traction WeakSnow Braking WinnerContinental VikingContact 8

2022 1 test
P5 of 8 Beat 43% of the field

2022 ViBilagare Nordic SUV Winter Tire Test

Vi Bilagare 235/55 R18

Another novelty among the friction tires is the F-Snow 1, which is part of Falken's new Winterpeak family. Just like the studded sibling F-Ice 1, the friction tire has a very soft rubber compound that provides good grip on snow and ice. The tire construction is also on the softer side, which contributes to compliant behavior on winter roads with a steady rear end without any skidding tendencies under pressure. The soft rubber also provides short braking distances on dry roads. The disadvantage is slow steering reactions and strong understeer in evasive maneuver tests on dry roads and in curves on wet roads. A bit numb steering feel also reduces the impression on bare ground. Overall, the Falken is an affordable option for those who prioritize high winter grip.

StrongDry BrakingSnow TractionSnow Handling WeakSubj. Dry HandlingRolling Resistance WinnerNokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV

Back to the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Falken tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.