Barum Polaris 5 - Test Results
Test Statistics
14
Tests Completed14th
Average Position4th
Best Result26th
Worst ResultPerformance Analysis
Across 14 winter-focused tests, the Barum Polaris 5 shows a clear value/efficiency profile with standout rolling resistance and fuel economy, plus decent durability and acceptable snow capability. However, it consistently lags in wet grip (braking/handling/aquaplaning) and often in dry braking, which depresses its average ranking (14.4) despite occasional mid-pack or better results in handling and snow.
The tire repeatedly earns praise for low running costs (top-tier rolling resistance, fuel use, strong value scores) and respectable wear, with some competitive snow handling/traction results. Its primary weakness is wet safety performance, where it frequently sits bottom-third, including aquaplaning, and is coupled with below-average dry braking in several tests.
Performance Strengths
-
Efficiency & Rolling Resistance
Strong
Details
• 1st place rolling resistance in 2024 Auto Bild (205/55 R16)
• 1st place rolling resistance in 2023 Auto Bild (225/45 R18)
• 1st place fuel consumption in 2023 ADAC 16" test (205/60 R16)
• 1st place rolling resistance in 2021 Auto Bild (205/55 R16)
• 1st place rolling resistance in 2019 Auto Center (205/55 R16)
-
Value for Money & Cost of Ownership
Strong
Details
• 1st place value in 2023 Auto Bild (10.5 Price/1000)
• 1st place value/price in 2021 Auto Bild (6.89 Price/1000; lowest price)
• Article mentions: "ranks first due to good lifespan and low cost" (2023 Auto Bild)
-
Wear/Longevity
Moderate
Details
• 4th/20 wear (42401 km) in 2023 Auto Bild
• 5th/20 wear (37000 km) in 2021 Auto Bild
• 4th/16 wear (46900 km) in 2023 ADAC
-
Snow Performance
Moderate
Details
• 2nd/23 snow traction (+1.7% from best) in 2024 Auto Bild
• Top-7 snow handling in 2021 (7/21, +1.7%) and 2024 (7/22, +2.1%) Auto Bild
• Consistently within ~3-7% of best in snow braking across multiple years
-
Dry Handling (not braking)
Minor
Details
• 5th/23 dry handling (+4.4%) in 2024 Auto Bild
• 4th/22 dry handling (+3.1%) in 2023 Auto Bild
• 13th/22 dry handling (+3.2%) in 2021 Auto Bild (mid-pack speed close to best)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Wet Grip & Aquaplaning
Strong
Details
• 19/23 wet braking (+11.3%), 19/23 wet handling (+5.5%), 20/23 wet circle (+9.3%), and 20/23 straight aqua (+10.8%) in 2024 Auto Bild; curved aquaplaning 20/23 (+26.7%)
• 13/22 wet braking (+13.2%), 18/22 wet handling (+6.2%), 17/22 curved aquaplaning (+26.7%) in 2023 Auto Bild
• 10/16-15/16 wet metrics with straight aquaplaning 15/16 (+11.6%) in 2023 ADAC
• 15/21-16/21 wet metrics in 2020 Auto Bild (+16.3% wet braking)
-
Dry Braking
Strong
Details
• 19/23 dry braking (+17.9%) in 2024 Auto Bild
• 13/22 dry braking (+20.1%) in 2023 Auto Bild
• 19/22 dry braking (+29.6%) in 2021 Auto Bild
• 14/21 dry braking (+21.5%) in 2020 Auto Bild
-
Noise/Comfort
Moderate
Details
• 16/23 noise (+2.6%) in 2024 Auto Bild
• 15/22 noise (+3.0%) in 2023 Auto Bild
• 15/16 noise (+3.4%) in 2023 ADAC
-
Overall Ranking Consistency
Moderate
Details
• Average overall position 14.4 across 14 tests
• Bottom third finishes: 2024 Auto Bild full test 16/23; 2023 ADAC 12/16; 2021 ADAC 12/16; 2020 Auto Bild 15/21
Performance Over Time
Test History
2024 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
2024
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 870
Snow Traction, Rolling Resistance
2023 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
2023
Winner: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
Rolling Resistance, Value
2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test
2023
Winner: Dunlop Winter Sport 5
Fuel Consumption
Noise, Straight Aqua
2022 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15
2022
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 870
2021 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
2021
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 870
Price, Rolling Resistance, Value
2020 Winter Tire Market Overview - 52 Tire Braking Test
2020
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
2019 Auto Center Winter Tire Test
2019
Winner: Nokian WR Snowproof
Rolling Resistance, Subj. Wet Handling
Subj. Snow Handling