Test source AutoView

2026 AutoView Value Sport Tire Test

Overall test winnerContinental MaxContact MC7

AutoView has tested four of the mid-range sport summer tires that have quietly taken over the performance market in Korea.

Data analyzed and reviewed byJonathan Benson

June 25, 2026 7 min read

Tire shortlist Read the test Watch on YouTube

Tires tested: 4
Tested size: 235/40 R18
Test vehicle: Hyundai Avante N Line (CN7)
Disciplines: 7

At a glance

Tire shortlist

4 Tires tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1^st

Continental MaxContact MC7

+The Continental MaxContact MC7 was the standout performer of this test on the objective measures. It recorded the shortest dry and wet braking distances of the four tires and set the quickest lap of the circuit, combining strong outright grip with brake performance that held up under repeated stops. Its steering was the most informative of the group, with consistent weight and predictable behavior as the car was pushed beyond the limit, which made it the tire to trust for hard or sustained cornering.

−The main weakness of the MaxContact MC7 is rolling resistance. It coasted less far than the efficiency-focused tires here, so on an electric or economy-minded car it would give up some range and fuel economy. That is the trade-off for its high grip, but it is the one area where it clearly trails the field.

17 owner reviews Test Results

2^nd

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72

+The Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 posted the highest cornering grip of the test and was also the quietest tire on the move, a useful pairing for a car that spends most of its life on the road rather than a track. It is the cheapest tire here by a clear margin, which makes it the value pick of the group and explains much of its strong showing once price is taken into account.

−The Kumho's limitations show up when it is pushed hard. It had the longest dry braking distance of the four, and its behavior past the grip limit is abrupt, breaking away quickly and leaving the driver little time to react, which undermines the confidence its high peak grip should inspire. Rolling resistance is also poor, so efficiency is not a strong point.

41 owner reviews Test Results

3^rd

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

+The Michelin Pilot Sport 5 earned the best subjective handling score of the test, with steering that stays weighted and predictable regardless of speed and a limit that is easy to read, so the driver always knows what the car is about to do. It was also comfortably the most efficient tire here, rolling furthest in the coasting test, and its braking in both the dry and the wet was among the best of the group. As the established benchmark, it set the reference the others were measured against.

−Despite its polished feel, the Pilot Sport 5 set the slowest lap of the four, where outright pace counts for more than finesse, and it scored lowest for ride comfort in this company. It is also the most expensive tire on test, which counts against it heavily once value is part of the equation.

135 owner reviews Test Results

4^th

Hankook Ventus Evo

+The Hankook Ventus Evo was the most comfortable tire of the test and turned in a competitive lap time, helped by composed behavior on corner exit and a willingness to put its power down on the way out of bends. Its everyday manners are good, with a supple ride that suits a road-biased sport tire.

−The Ventus Evo gives up ground when grip matters most. It held the lowest cornering speed and the longest wet braking distance of the four, and it was the noisiest tire on the move. The steering is slow to respond as a corner is set up and lightens as speed builds, and the rear can let go abruptly, all of which point to handling that would benefit from further development.

24 owner reviews Test Results

Tire shortlist

Compare selected tires

2026 AutoView Value Sport Tire Test · 235/40 R18

Tire	Continental MaxContact MC7	Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72	Michelin Pilot Sport 5	Hankook Ventus Evo
Position	1^st	2^nd	3^rd	4^th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry	99.9%	96.3%	98.5%	97.4%
Wet	100%	98.3%	99.5%	96.7%
Comfort	98.3%	98.7%	94.5%	98.8%
Keep researching	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

AutoView has tested four of the mid-range sport summer tires that have quietly taken over the performance market in Korea. As the old budget sport tires have been retired, makers have pushed this middle tier much closer to their flagship products, so a buyer no longer has to spend premium money to get genuinely capable summer rubber. To find out how close these value options really get, AutoView fitted each tire to a Hyundai Avante N Line in 235/40 R18 and ran a full programme of dry braking, cornering, circuit lap, wet braking, rolling resistance and noise tests, backed up by subjective handling and comfort scoring.

The Continental MaxContact MC7 was the clear performance winner. It posted the shortest dry and wet braking distances, set the fastest lap of the day and had the most composed, informative handling of the group, which is enough to make it the tire to beat in this class. The surprises came further down the order: the cheapest tire on test, the Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, recorded the highest outright cornering grip and the lowest cabin noise, while the well-known Michelin Pilot Sport 5 took the best subjective handling score and was by far the most efficient, yet set the slowest lap.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking: 62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking: 49.7 → 0.0 mph

A note on timing and scoring: AutoView gathered this data in 2025 and has published it under a revised 2026 scoring system that is more forgiving of small measurement gaps and weighs price more heavily. Under those 2026 rules the running order behind the Continental shifts, with the bargain-priced Kumho climbing ahead of the more expensive Michelin into second place. It is worth adding that the Kumho has since become hard to buy in its home market after a factory fire halted domestic production, which tempers an otherwise strong value story.

Two of the dry tests need a quick explanation. The circuit lap rolls braking, cornering and acceleration into a single time and is the best guide to all-round pace, though AutoView notes that ambient temperature and the test car's cooling can move the figures. Cornering grip was measured separately as the highest average speed the car could hold on a fixed 131 feet radius skidpad before sliding, which we record here as Dry Circle Speed.

Dry Braking

The Continental was the only tire to stop from 62 mph in under 112 feet, and it also felt the most positive under the brake pedal. The Michelin and Hankook followed within striking distance, while the Kumho needed noticeably more road to pull up, the weakest result of an otherwise grippy tire.

Dry Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Continental MaxContact MC7	111 ft	Best	0 mph
2Michelin Pilot Sport 5	113 ft	+2 ft	11 mph
3Hankook Ventus Evo	114 ft	+3 ft	13 mph
4Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72	116 ft	+5 ft	16 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4.4% (5 ft ≈ 0.3 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 would still be travelling at 16 mph when the Continental MaxContact MC7 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Cornering and Handling

On the skidpad the order was turned on its head: the Kumho held the highest cornering speed, narrowly ahead of the Continental and Michelin, with the Hankook some way back. The catch is how that grip is delivered, as the Kumho lets go sharply once the limit is passed, where the Continental and Michelin slide progressively and give the driver time to react.

Dry Circle Speed
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72	45.8 mph	Best
2Continental MaxContact MC7	45.1 mph	-0.7 mph
3Michelin Pilot Sport 5	44.7 mph	-1.1 mph
4Hankook Ventus Evo	43.6 mph	-2.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4.9% (2.2 mph).

That difference is reflected in the subjective handling scores, where the Michelin's predictable, consistently weighted steering earned top marks just ahead of the Continental, and the Kumho and Hankook trailed for their vaguer or snappier responses.

Subj. Dry Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin Pilot Sport 5	8 Points	Best
2Continental MaxContact MC7	7.9 Points	-0.10 Points
3Hankook Ventus Evo	7.2 Points	-0.80 Points
4Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72	7 Points	-1.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 12.5% (1 Points).

Pulling braking, grip and acceleration together over a full lap, the Continental was clearly quickest. The Hankook took second on lap time, helped by strong corner exit, with the Kumho and Michelin close behind, the Michelin paying for its road-biased setup with the slowest time of the four.

Dry Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Continental MaxContact MC7	95.69 s	Best
2Hankook Ventus Evo	96.77 s	+1.08 s
3Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72	97.05 s	+1.36 s
4Michelin Pilot Sport 5	97.11 s	+1.42 s

All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Wet Braking

Wet stopping power separated the leaders by the smallest of margins. The Continental stopped shortest from 50 mph, with the Michelin so close behind that AutoView treats the two as effectively equal. The Kumho and Hankook were a step back, the Hankook giving up the most road in the wet.

Wet Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Continental MaxContact MC7	78 ft	Best	0 mph
2Michelin Pilot Sport 5	78 ft	0 ft	5 mph
3Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72	79 ft	+1 ft	11 mph
4Hankook Ventus Evo	80 ft	+2 ft	14 mph

The difference between best and worst was 3.4% (2 ft). From 80 mph, the Hankook Ventus Evo would still be travelling at 14 mph when the Continental MaxContact MC7 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Comfort and Noise

For a set of sport tires these are all reasonably refined, but the Kumho was the quietest on the move, with the Michelin and Continental level a touch behind and the Hankook the most vocal of the four.

Noise
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72	62.2 dB	Best
2Michelin Pilot Sport 5	62.7 dB	+0.50 dB
2Continental MaxContact MC7	62.7 dB	+0.50 dB
4Hankook Ventus Evo	63.7 dB	+1.50 dB

All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Subjectively, the Hankook rode the best, with the Continental and Kumho close together and the Michelin judged the firmest of the group.

Subj. Comfort
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Hankook Ventus Evo	7.8 Points	Best
2Continental MaxContact MC7	7.6 Points	-0.20 Points
2Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72	7.6 Points	-0.20 Points
4Michelin Pilot Sport 5	7 Points	-0.80 Points

The difference between best and worst was 10.3% (0.8 Points).

Efficiency and Value

Rolling resistance was measured by coasting in neutral and seeing how far each tire carried the car. We have not charted that result here because the units do not map onto our rolling-resistance scale, but the order is worth knowing: the Michelin rolled furthest by a clear margin, the Hankook was close behind, and the grippier Continental and Kumho gave up the most energy, so the first two would be the kinder choices for fuel economy or electric range. On price the Kumho was the cheapest tire by a wide margin and the Michelin the dearest, which is what lifts the Kumho up the order and pushes the Michelin down once value is part of the sum.

Results

The Continental MaxContact MC7 wins this test on merit, leading the braking, lap and wet tests and backing that with the most trustworthy handling. The Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 is the value standout and the surprise of the group for outright grip and quietness, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 remains the polished, efficient all-rounder that asks a premium, and the Hankook Ventus Evo is the comfort choice that needs more work on grip and wet safety. The full programme, including the rolling-resistance figures and AutoView's own scoring tables, is on the original article at autoview.co.kr.

2026 AutoView Value Sport Tire TestWatch the full video of this test on YouTube Watch on YouTube

AutoView Test Winner

The Continental MaxContact MC7 is the overall winner of this test. It leads or sits near the top in almost every dry and wet test and pairs that with the most composed handling balance, which makes it the tire to beat in this value sport segment. Drivers who want maximum performance, and do not mind paying a little more or losing a little efficiency, will be very well served.

Dry99.9%

Wet100%

Comfort98.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (7)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1^st / 4	111 ft	Best in this discipline
Dry HandlingLower is better	1^st / 4	95.69 s	Best in this discipline
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 4	7.9 Points	-0.10 Points
Dry Circle SpeedHigher is better	2^nd / 4	45.1 mph	-0.7 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 4	78 ft	Best in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	2^nd / 4	7.6 Points	-0.20 Points
NoiseLower is better	2^nd / 4	62.7 dB	+0.50 dB

Weight: 10.71 kgs
Tread: 6.88 mm

AutoView Best Value

The Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 is the value champion of this test and finishes a close second once price is weighed in. It offers genuine cornering grip and good refinement for the money, held back mainly by long braking and a snappy limit that needs more development. Its appeal is further blunted by supply problems following a factory fire, which has made it hard to buy.

Dry96.3%

Wet98.3%

Comfort98.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (7)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4^th / 4	116 ft	+5 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better	3^rd / 4	97.05 s	+1.36 s
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 4	7 Points	-1.00 Points
Dry Circle SpeedHigher is better	1^st / 4	45.8 mph	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 4	79 ft	+1 ft
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	2^nd / 4	7.6 Points	-0.20 Points
NoiseLower is better	1^st / 4	62.2 dB	Best in this discipline

Weight: 9.97 kgs
Tread: 7.40 mm

The Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is a balanced and confidence-inspiring all-rounder that does almost everything well, with class-leading efficiency and the most natural handling feel of the group. Its weakness here is value rather than ability: strong on the road but priced above its rivals, it slips behind the cheaper tires once cost is taken into account.

Dry98.5%

Wet99.5%

Comfort94.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (7)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 4	113 ft	+2 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better	4^th / 4	97.11 s	+1.42 s
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 4	8 Points	Best in this discipline
Dry Circle SpeedHigher is better	3^rd / 4	44.7 mph	-1.1 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 4	78 ft	0 ft
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	4^th / 4	7 Points	-0.80 Points
NoiseLower is better	2^nd / 4	62.7 dB	+0.50 dB

Weight: 10.36 kgs
Tread: 7.21 mm

The Hankook Ventus Evo is a comfortable, road-friendly tire that is competitive on lap time but trails the leaders where ultimate grip and wet safety are concerned. It is a reasonable choice for a driver who values refinement over outright cornering performance, though its vaguer steering and weaker wet braking keep it at the back of this particular field.

Dry97.4%

Wet96.7%

Comfort98.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (7)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 4	114 ft	+3 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better	2^nd / 4	96.77 s	+1.08 s
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 4	7.2 Points	-0.80 Points
Dry Circle SpeedHigher is better	4^th / 4	43.6 mph	-2.2 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 4	80 ft	+2 ft
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	1^st / 4	7.8 Points	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	4^th / 4	63.7 dB	+1.50 dB

Weight: 9.67 kgs
Tread: 7.14 mm

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

AutoView2026

2026 AutoView Sport Tire Test

225/45 R187 tires tested

4 of these 4 tires tested again

Winner there

Continental MaxContact MC7

Same winner

Auto Bild2026

2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test

245/45 R1920 tires tested

3 of these 4 tires tested again

Winner there

Hankook Ventus Evo

Auto Bild2026

2026 Summer Braking Super Tire Test - How do 52 Tires Perform in Wet and Dry Braking?

245/45 R1950 tires tested

3 of these 4 tires tested again

Winner there

Linglong Sport Master

More tire tests2026 Tire Rack Streetable Track Tire Test 2026 Auto Express Summer Tire Test Michelin Range Test - CrossClimate 3, 3 Sport, Primacy 5, Pilot Sport 5 and Cup 2 The BEST Streetable Track Tires in 2026 Tested All tests: Summer Tires

Best tiresBest UUHP Tires Best Performance Summer Tires Best Summer Tires

Menu

2026 AutoView Value Sport Tire Test