Ceat SportDrive vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107

Test Results

Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been five tests which compare both tires directly!

While it might look like the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 is better than the Ceat SportDrive purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.

Key Strengths

Ceat SportDrive

• Low rolling resistance and better fuel consumption
• Strong projected wear and low abrasion (lower long-term cost)
• Lower external noise/refinement
• Better value score (lower price per performance)

Yokohama Advan Sport V107

• Class-leading dry braking across tests
• Consistently shorter wet braking distances
• Better dry and wet handling confidence and stability
• Competitive all-round performance near the front of test groups

Real World Driver Reviews

Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Ceat SportDrive and Yokohama Advan Sport V107.

In total the Ceat SportDrive has been reviewed 0 times and drivers have given the tire 0% overall.

The Yokohama Advan Sport V107 has been reviewed 20 times and drivers have given the tire 73% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.

Conclusion

If your priority is grip, precision and short stopping distances, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 is the clear choice. It wins every dry and wet braking contest here (by roughly 5-10%) and leads the dynamic categories, translating to stronger safety margins and more confidence at the limit. Its downsides are higher rolling resistance and projected wear, plus a weaker value score. The Ceat SportDrive underperforms in wet and dry grip, but fights back with refinement, efficiency and cost-of-ownership. It is quieter, rolls easier, shows notably longer projected mileage (+31%), lower abrasion, and better fuel use, and it scores strongly on value. For everyday drivers prioritizing economy and comfort over ultimate performance, the Ceat can make sense-provided you accept its weaker wet and dry stopping capability. For spirited driving or safety-first buyers, the Yokohama is the safer, more capable bet.

Key Differences

• Braking: Yokohama stops 5-11% shorter in dry and 6-10% shorter in wet across tests
• Handling: Yokohama quicker in both dry and wet laps; Ceat trails notably in wet control
• Aquaplaning: Generally better curved/overall for Yokohama; straight-line roughly even
• Efficiency: Ceat has lower rolling resistance and better fuel use
• Longevity: Ceat shows substantially higher projected mileage and lower abrasion
• Value/Price: Ceat rated significantly better on value; Yokohama is pricier to buy and run

Overall Winner: Yokohama Advan Sport V107

Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:

Ceat SportDrive Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.