Continental VikingContact 7 vs Bridgestone Blizzak Ice
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tires, the Continental VikingContact 7 finished ahead 3 times and the Blizzak Ice not once. The VikingContact 7 was stronger in wet, snow, ice and value, the Blizzak Ice in dry.
Performance profile
12 measurements from the 3 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
VikingContact 7
Blizzak Ice
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 90%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 6 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
VikingContact 7
Blizzak Ice
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
VikingContact 7
Blizzak Ice
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the VikingContact 7 74% from 25 reviews and the Blizzak Ice 76% from 3. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | VikingContact 7 | Gap | Blizzak Ice | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Blizzak Ice ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 99 | 1.5% | 97 | 0-3 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | 61.9% | scored | 2-1 |
| Wet VikingContact 7 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 127 | 5% | 134 | 3-0 |
| Wet Handling s | 40.36 | 3.7% | 42.01 | 3-0 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | scored | 33.3% | scored | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 39.4 | 4.6% | 37.7 | 2-0 |
| Snow VikingContact 7 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking ft | 81 | 2.4% | 83 | 3-0 |
| Snow Traction s | 5.23 | 2.9% | 5.4 | 2-0 |
| Snow Handling s | 65.42 | 2.3% | 66.71 | 3-0 |
| Subj. Snow Handling pts | scored | 12.5% | scored | 1-0 |
| Ice VikingContact 7 ahead | ||||
| Ice Braking ft | 64 | 8.9% | 69 | 3-0 |
| Ice Traction s | 6.66 | 4.8% | 6.98 | 2-0 |
| Ice Handling s | 51.44 | 2.6% | 52.77 | 3-0 |
| Subj. Ice Handling pts | scored | 14.3% | scored | 1-0 |
| Comfort Level | ||||
| Subj. Noise pts | scored | 33.3% | scored | 1-0 |
| Noise dB | 74 | 0.3 dB | 73.7 | 0-1 |
| Value VikingContact 7 ahead | ||||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 6.05 | 2.4% | 6.2 | 1-0 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5 | 3.8% | 5.2 | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 3 tests, 2020 to 2023
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | VikingContact 7 | Field | Blizzak Ice |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Studless Friction Winter Tire Test | P1 of 8 | P5 of 8 | |
| 2020 Vi Bilagare Nordic Friction Winter Tire Test | P1 of 8 | P7 of 8 | |
| 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tire Test | P2 of 12 | P8 of 12 |
VikingContact 7 vs Blizzak Ice: your questions
Is the Continental VikingContact 7 or the Bridgestone Blizzak Ice the better tire?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tires, the Continental VikingContact 7 finished ahead 3 times and the Blizzak Ice not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the VikingContact 7 scores 8.6 and the Blizzak Ice 6 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the VikingContact 7 or the Blizzak Ice?
The VikingContact 7 led 9 of the 9 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 5% shorter in the wet across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Blizzak Ice led 4 of the 6 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.5% shorter in the dry across 3 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The VikingContact 7 led 9 of the 9 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.4% shorter on snow across 3 tests.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.5/10 for the VikingContact 7 and 8.5/10 for the Blizzak Ice.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the VikingContact 7 74% from 25 reviews and the Blizzak Ice 76% from 3.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The VikingContact 7 is made in 134 sizes (14 to 22 inch) and the Blizzak Ice in 61 (13 to 19 inch). 50 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the VikingContact 7 is graded D for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Blizzak Ice E and E.
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.