Continental TerrainContact A/T vs Firestone Destination A/T2
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tires, the Firestone Destination A/T2 finished ahead 2 times and the TerrainContact A/T not once. The TerrainContact A/T was stronger in dry and comfort, the Destination A/T2 in snow, off road and value.
Performance profile
20 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
TerrainContact A/T
Destination A/T2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
TerrainContact A/T
Destination A/T2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
TerrainContact A/T
Destination A/T2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the TerrainContact A/T 79% from 9 reviews and the Destination A/T2 83% from 7. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | TerrainContact A/T | Gap | Destination A/T2 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry TerrainContact A/T ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 136 | 8% | 148 | 1-0 |
| Dry Handling s | 68.6 | 0.7% | 69.06 | 1-0 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | 5.6% | scored | 1-0 |
| Wet Level | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 190 | 0.9% | 192 | 1-0 |
| Wet Handling s | 81.33 | 0.3% | 81.59 | 1-0 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | scored | 11.1% | scored | 1-0 |
| Wet Circle s | 13.39 | 0.7% | 13.3 | 0-1 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 52.4 | 1.8% | 53.4 | 0-1 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 10.2 | 16.3% | 11.9 | 0-1 |
| Snow Destination A/T2 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking ft | 157 | 4.9% | 149 | 0-2 |
| Snow Traction s | 5.66 | 10.4% | 5.07 | 0-2 |
| Snow Handling s | 102.6 | 4.7% | 97.73 | 0-2 |
| Off road Destination A/T2 ahead | ||||
| Gravel Handling s | 62.73 | 1.5% | 61.77 | 0-1 |
| Subj. Gravel Handling pts | scored | 11.8% | scored | 0-1 |
| Dirt Handling s | 58 | 0.2% | 57.91 | 0-1 |
| Subj. Dirt Handling pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Comfort TerrainContact A/T ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Subj. Noise pts | scored | 5.3% | scored | 1-0 |
| Noise dB | 71.9 | 0.9 dB | 72.8 | 1-0 |
| Value Destination A/T2 ahead | ||||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 9.67 | 12.9% | 8.42 | 0-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 2 tests, 2022 to 2023
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | TerrainContact A/T | Field | Destination A/T2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023/24 Best All Terrain Tires In Snow | P5 of 7 | P2 of 7 | |
| 2022/23 Best 9 All Terrain Tires | P2 of 9 | P1 of 9 |
TerrainContact A/T vs Destination A/T2: your questions
Is the Continental TerrainContact A/T or the Firestone Destination A/T2 the better tire?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tires, the Firestone Destination A/T2 finished ahead 2 times and the TerrainContact A/T not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the TerrainContact A/T scores 8.6 and the Destination A/T2 8.6 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the TerrainContact A/T or the Destination A/T2?
Across the shared tests the wet measurements are split 3-3 between the TerrainContact A/T and the Destination A/T2.
Which is better in the dry?
The TerrainContact A/T led 3 of the 3 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. It stopped 8% shorter in the dry in the one shared test that measured it.
Which is better in snow?
The Destination A/T2 led 6 of the 6 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it was 10.4% quicker in the snow traction test across 2 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Destination A/T2 had 12.9% lower rolling resistance (1 test). Owners rate wear 7.6/10 for the TerrainContact A/T and 7.3/10 for the Destination A/T2.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The TerrainContact A/T was 0.9 dB quieter (1 test). Owners rate comfort 8.1/10 for the TerrainContact A/T and 8.7/10 for the Destination A/T2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the TerrainContact A/T 79% from 9 reviews and the Destination A/T2 83% from 7. 67% of TerrainContact A/T owners would buy it again, against 83% for the Destination A/T2.
Which is the newer tire?
The TerrainContact A/T is the newer design: it reached the market in 2021, the Destination A/T2 in 2019.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Continental TerrainContact A/T vs Toyo Open Country A/T III
3-1 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Continental TerrainContact A/T vs Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus
2-0 in 2 shared tests
vs 
Continental TerrainContact A/T vs Goodyear Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure
2-0 in 2 shared tests
vs
Firestone Destination A/T2 vs Goodyear Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure
2-0 in 2 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.