Michelin CrossClimate+ vs Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
In the 10 independent tests that ran both tires, the Michelin CrossClimate+ finished ahead 10 times and the EUROALL SEASON AS210 not once. The CrossClimate+ was stronger in dry, wet, comfort and value, the EUROALL SEASON AS210 in snow.
Performance profile
11 measurements from the 10 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
CrossClimate+
EUROALL SEASON AS210
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 7 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
CrossClimate+
EUROALL SEASON AS210
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
CrossClimate+
EUROALL SEASON AS210
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the CrossClimate+ 83% from 120 reviews and the EUROALL SEASON AS210 80% from 33. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | CrossClimate+ | Gap | EUROALL SEASON AS210 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry CrossClimate+ ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking - Cool ft | 131 | 3.6% | 135 | 1-0 |
| Dry Braking ft | 131 | 7% | 141 | 7-0 |
| Dry Handling - Cool s | 76.9 | 0.6% | 77.4 | 1-0 |
| Dry Handling (s) | 69.3 | 0.4% | 69.6 | 1-0 |
| Dry Handling (mph) | 65.2 | 0.3% | 65 | 3-0 |
| Wet CrossClimate+ ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 158 | 4.3% | 164 | 7-0 |
| Wet Braking - Cool ft | 185 | 14% | 215 | 1-0 |
| Wet Handling - Cool s | 90.6 | 3.5% | 93.9 | 1-0 |
| Wet Handling (s) | 68 | 4.6% | 64.9 | 0-1 |
| Wet Handling (mph) | 44.1 | 2.2% | 43.1 | 3-1 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 48.9 | 4.1% | 50.9 | 0-5 |
| Snow EUROALL SEASON AS210 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking ft | 96 | 1.9% | 94 | 1-4 |
| Snow Traction lbf | 625 | 0.6% | 618 | 1-1 |
| Snow Handling s | 30.7 | 1% | 30.4 | 0-1 |
| Snow Handling (mph) | 28.9 | 0.6% | 29.1 | 2-2 |
| Comfort CrossClimate+ ahead | ||||
| Noise dB | 70.28 | 1.8 dB | 72.1 | 5-0 |
| Value CrossClimate+ ahead | ||||
| Wear miles | 40,082 | 8.6% | 37,133 | 2-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.1 | 8.6% | 8.85 | 5-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 10 tests, 2018 to 2021
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | CrossClimate+ | Field | EUROALL SEASON AS210 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 AZ All Season Tire Test | P4 of 9 | P8 of 9 | |
| 2020 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tire Test | P5 of 11 | P6 of 11 | |
| 2020 Sport Auto All Season Tire Test | P2 of 7 | P7 of 7 | |
| 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P4 of 14 | P5 of 14 | |
| 2020 All Season Tire Market Overview - 32 Tire Braking Test | P5 of 32 | P11 of 32 | |
| 2019 Auto Express All Season Tire Test | P3 of 11 | P6 of 11 | |
| 2019 All Season Tire Performance Overview | P2 of 31 | P11 of 31 | |
| 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P4 of 10 | P6 of 10 | |
| 2018 27 All Season Tire Shootout | P2 of 27 | P7 of 27 | |
| 7 of the best all season tires | P1 of 10 | P5 of 10 |
CrossClimate+ vs EUROALL SEASON AS210: your questions
Is the Michelin CrossClimate+ or the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 the better tire?
In the 10 independent tests that ran both tires, the Michelin CrossClimate+ finished ahead 10 times and the EUROALL SEASON AS210 not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the CrossClimate+ scores 9.4 and the EUROALL SEASON AS210 8.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the CrossClimate+ or the EUROALL SEASON AS210?
The CrossClimate+ led 12 of the 19 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.3% shorter in the wet across 7 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The CrossClimate+ led 13 of the 14 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 7% shorter in the dry across 7 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The EUROALL SEASON AS210 led 8 of the 12 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.9% shorter on snow across 5 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The CrossClimate+ lasted 8.6% longer in the wear tests (2 tests) and had 8.6% lower rolling resistance (5 tests). Owners rate wear 8.7/10 for the CrossClimate+ and 8.7/10 for the EUROALL SEASON AS210.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The CrossClimate+ was 1.8 dB quieter (5 tests). Owners rate comfort 8.6/10 for the CrossClimate+ and 7.8/10 for the EUROALL SEASON AS210.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the CrossClimate+ 83% from 120 reviews and the EUROALL SEASON AS210 80% from 33. 87% of CrossClimate+ owners would buy it again, against 84% for the EUROALL SEASON AS210.
Which is more expensive?
In the 4 tests that listed prices, the CrossClimate+ was the dearer tire in 4 of them, by 33.3% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The CrossClimate+ is made in 63 sizes (13 to 19 inch) and the EUROALL SEASON AS210 in 93 (13 to 20 inch). 51 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the CrossClimate+ is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the EUROALL SEASON AS210 B and D.
More comparisons with these tires
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.