Michelin AGILIS 3 vs Nokian Cargoproof C
Ahead in each discipline
The Michelin AGILIS 3 and the Nokian Cargoproof C have met in one independent test so far, and the Cargoproof C finished ahead. The AGILIS 3 was stronger in comfort and value, the Cargoproof C in dry and wet.
Performance profile
11 measurements from the one shared test, each tire shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
AGILIS 3
Cargoproof C
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 85%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tires' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tire that did better.
| Measurement | AGILIS 3 | Gap | Cargoproof C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Cargoproof C ahead | |||
| Dry Braking ft | 141 | 4.7% | 135 |
| Dry Handling mph | 48.7 | 0.5% | 48.9 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | 7 | 14.3% | 8 |
| Wet Cargoproof C ahead | |||
| Wet Braking ft | 100 | 9.9% | 90 |
| Wet Handling mph | 40.8 | 1.8% | 41.5 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | 7 | 28.6% | 9 |
| Wet Circle mph | 16.1 | 1% | 16.3 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 59.1 | 4.5% | 56.5 |
| Comfort AGILIS 3 ahead | |||
| Subj. Comfort pts | 9 | 12.5% | 8 |
| Noise dB | 70.7 | 1 dB | 71.7 |
| Value AGILIS 3 ahead | |||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 5.4 | 8.5% | 5.9 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | AGILIS 3 | Field | Cargoproof C |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Summer Motorhome and Van Tire Test | P4 of 7 | P2 of 7 |
AGILIS 3 vs Cargoproof C: your questions
Is the Michelin AGILIS 3 or the Nokian Cargoproof C the better tire?
The Michelin AGILIS 3 and the Nokian Cargoproof C have met in one independent test so far, and the Cargoproof C finished ahead.
Which is better in the wet, the AGILIS 3 or the Cargoproof C?
The Cargoproof C led 4 of the 5 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The Cargoproof C led 3 of the 3 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the AGILIS 3 96% from 1 reviews; the Cargoproof C has no owner reviews yet.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The AGILIS 3 is made in 20 sizes (15 to 17 inch) and the Cargoproof C in 19 (15 to 17 inch). 18 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the AGILIS 3 is graded A for wet grip and B for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Cargoproof C A and B.
Which is the newer tire?
The Cargoproof C is the newer design: it reached the market in 2024, the AGILIS 3 in 2003.
More comparisons with these tires
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.