Dunlop All Season 2 vs Toyo Celsius AS2
The data shows a clear pattern: Dunlop consistently leads in wet braking and winter capability, while Toyo trades some snow and wet bite for stronger dry braking, better aquaplaning resistance, and marginally lower rolling resistance in some sizes. Both are economical long-runners, yet Dunlop repeatedly posts the higher projected mileage.

Test Results
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been four tests which compare both tires directly!
| Tire | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Dunlop All Season 2 | three | |
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | one |
While it might look like the Dunlop All Season 2 is better than the Toyo Celsius AS2 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Key Strengths
- Class-leading mileage and low abrasion (approx. 67-69k km projections)
- Best-in-test pattern for wet braking across sizes
- Decisive snow performance (traction, handling, braking)
- Solid cost-per-1,000 km and competitive rolling resistance
- Shorter dry braking distances in all shared tests
- Better straight and curved aquaplaning resistance
- Quieter pass-by noise
- Occasionally lower rolling resistance/fuel use
Dry Braking
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during four dry braking tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 stopped the vehicle in 4.52% less distance than the Dunlop All Season 2.
Best In Dry Braking: Toyo Celsius AS2
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 was 0.26% faster around a lap than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during four wet braking tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 stopped the vehicle in 3.13% less distance than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Wet Braking: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 was 1.73% faster around a wet lap than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 was 2.91% faster around a wet circle than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Wet Circle: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 floated at a 4.69% higher speed than the Dunlop All Season 2.
Best In Straight Aqua: Toyo Celsius AS2
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 slipped out at a 0.98% higher speed than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during two snow braking tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 stopped the vehicle in 4.94% less distance than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Snow Braking: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 had 11.19% better snow traction than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Snow Traction: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during two snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 was 5.09% faster around a lap than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Circle
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 provided 3.6% more lateral grip than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Snow Circle: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 was 2.33% faster through a slalom than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Snow Slalom: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during two noise tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 measured 0.55% quieter than the Dunlop All Season 2.
Best In Noise: Toyo Celsius AS2
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during two wear tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 is predicted to cover 4.66% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Wear: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during one value tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 proved to have a 1.07% better value based on price/1000km than the Dunlop All Season 2.
Best In Value: Toyo Celsius AS2
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 had a 0.92% lower rolling resistance than the Dunlop All Season 2.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Toyo Celsius AS2
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 used 0.42% less fuel than the Dunlop All Season 2.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Toyo Celsius AS2
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during two abrasion tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 lost 7.99% less particle wear matter than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Abrasion: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Dunlop All Season 2 Driver Reviews
Drivers of the Dunlop All Season 2 report a strongly positive experience overall, with standout wet grip and reassuring all-season performance. Many highlight excellent tread life and overall safety/confidence, with some even calling it the best tire they've owned. A minority note elevated noise or squeal, and a few mixed comments appear on sporty/dry handling, but these are not widespread.
Based on 6 reviews with an average rating of 78%
Toyo Celsius AS2 Driver Reviews
Drivers largely praise the Toyo Celsius AS2 for excellent comfort, low noise, and confident grip in wet and dry, with several noting stable snow performance for an all-season. A few report a softer, slightly spongy feel and average handling focus, and one low-scoring review found wet/snow performance uninspiring. Overall, sentiment is strongly positive with comfort and quietness as standout strengths.
Based on 5 reviews with an average rating of 79%
Conclusion
The Toyo Celsius AS2 suits milder climates and motorway commuters: it brakes shorter on dry, rides a touch quieter, and resists aquaplaning better in straight and curved tests-useful in heavy rain at speed. Its economy focus is credible, though Dunlop's superior mileage often offsets any small efficiency advantage. In short: Dunlop for all-weather assurance and cost-per-km, Toyo for dry-road commuting with strong rain-channeling stability.
Key Differences
- Wet braking: Dunlop consistently shorter (e.g., 49.2-49.3 m vs 51.0 m).
- Snow capability: Dunlop notably stronger (up to +10-14% traction, +4-6% handling/braking).
- Dry braking: Toyo shorter (around 4-5% advantage).
- Aquaplaning: Toyo leads in straight and often curved tests (+2-7% headroom).
- Longevity: Dunlop higher mileage and lower abrasion (+4-12%).
- Noise/efficiency: Toyo slightly quieter and can edge rolling resistance/fuel.
Overall Winner: Dunlop All Season 2
Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Dunlop All Season 2 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
Dunlop All Season 2 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Toyo Celsius AS2 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Footnote
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.