Yokohama Advan Sport V105 - Test Results
Test Statistics
15
Tests Completed9th
Average Position2nd
Best Result26th
Worst ResultPerformance Analysis
The Yokohama Advan Sport V105 delivers a sporty, engaging drive with occasional top-tier results, but its overall record trends mid-pack due to clear deficits in wet braking, rolling resistance, and noise. It shows flashes of excellence in subjective dry/wet handling and dry lap pace (including two podium overall finishes in EVO tests), yet frequently slips outside the top half in broader comparison tests.
Across 15 summer tests (average position 9.1), patterns show good dry handling balance and respectable aquaplaning resistance in some sizes, offset by repeatedly weak wet braking and poor efficiency. Noise levels are often high, and comfort is on the firmer side, reinforcing its sport-focused character rather than touring refinement.
Performance Strengths
-
Dry Handling and Subjective Steering
Strong
Details
• 3rd place dry handling (+1% from best) and 2nd place subjective dry handling (+2% from best) in 2022/23 Tire Reviews 17"
• Overall 2/9 with praise for all-round performance in 2016 EVO
• Overall 2/10 in 2015 EVO, noted as finishing just off the winner
-
Wet Handling (subjective balance) and Aquaplaning
Moderate
Details
• 4/10 wet handling (+1.4% from best) and 3/10 straight aquaplaning (+5.6% from best) in 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19"
• 3/9 subjective wet handling (+10% from best) in 2022/23 Tire Reviews 17"
• Good wet balance mentioned in 2016 AutoBild UHP (though braking lagged)
-
Overall Performance Potential (select tests)
Moderate
Details
• 2/9 overall in 2016 EVO (strong all-round performance)
• 2/10 overall in 2015 EVO
• 4/6 overall in 2016 AutoBild UHP
Performance Weaknesses
-
Wet Braking
Strong
Details
• 7/9 wet braking (+22.1% from best) in 2022/23 Tire Reviews 17"
• 8/10 wet braking (+13.4% from best) in 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19"
• 16/16 wet braking (+8.6% from best) in 2018 Test World
• 29/49 wet braking (+20.9% from best) in 2020 Auto Bild Market Overview
-
Rolling Resistance / Fuel Use
Strong
Details
• 9/9 rolling resistance (+44.8% from best) in 2022/23 Tire Reviews 17"
• 10/10 rolling resistance (+18.2% from best) in 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19"
• "Yokohama having the highest fuel use" noted in 2020 Auto Bild UHP
-
Noise and Comfort
Strong
Details
• 9/9 subjective comfort (+20% from best) and 8/9 noise (+5.9% from best) in 2022/23 Tire Reviews 17"
• 9/10 noise (+2.7% from best) with "significantly louder" comment in 2020 Auto Bild UHP
• 15/16 noise (+2.3% from best) in 2018 Test World
-
Overall Consistency Across Large Test Fields
Moderate
Details
• 13/16 overall in 2018 Test World
• 11/14 overall in 2016 GTU
• 11/12 overall in 2014 Auto Zeitung
• 17/50 in 2014 Auto Bild 50-tire shootout; 26/49 in 2020 Auto Bild braking overview
Performance Over Time
Test History
2022/23 Tire Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tire Test
2022
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Subj. Dry Handling
Noise, Subj. Comfort, Rolling Resistance
Noise, Rolling Resistance
2018 Test World Summer Tire Test
2018
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Noise, Wet Braking
2016 EVO Summer Performance Tire Test
2016
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 6
2015 EVO Magazine Performance Tire Test
2015
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5
2015 Auto Express Tire Test
2015
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5
2014 Auto Zeitung Summer Tire Test
2014
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5
2013 Auto Express Summer Tire Test
2013
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5