Menu

Tomket Sport 3 Series 3 - Test Results

Test Statistics

4

Tests Completed

30th

Average Position

11th

Best Result

49th

Worst Result

Performance Analysis

Tomket Sport 3 Series 3 - Official Image

Across four summer tire tests, the Tomket Sport 3 Series 3 shows a clear pattern of low-cost/low-resistance tuning that delivers strong environmental/comfort metrics, but with major compromises in wet-safety performance. Overall results are consistently below average (average overall position 30.3), including last place in a UHP comparative and near-bottom finishes in large group tests.

Its standout positives are efficiency-related measures (rolling resistance/fuel consumption) and occasional comfort/value highlights (very low noise in one test, low purchase price), but repeated poor wet braking, wet handling and aquaplaning scores indicate a consistent weakness in wet grip and stability-particularly concerning given the large time/distance gaps to the best performers.

Performance Strengths
  • Efficiency (Rolling Resistance / Fuel Consumption) Strong
    • 1st place rolling resistance (8.18 kg/t) in 2022 AutoBild Sportscars UHP test
    • 3rd place fuel consumption (5.6 l/100km, +1.8% from best) in 2023 ADAC test
  • Noise / Comfort Moderate
    • 1st place noise (70.8 dB) in 2022 AutoBild Sportscars UHP test; noted as 'lowest external noise on test'
    • Noise 71.6 dB in 2023 ADAC test (36/50, +3.6% from best) indicating relatively small deficit to best despite overall weak performance
  • Purchase Price / Budget Value Moderate
    • 1st place price (335) in 2022 AutoBild Sportscars UHP test
    • 6th place price (67, +48.9% from best) in 2023 ADAC test
  • Weight Minor
    • 1st place tire weight (7.6 kg) in 2023 ADAC test
Performance Weaknesses
  • Wet Braking (Primary Safety Deficit) Strong
    • 11th/11 wet braking (65.6 m, +43.5% from best) in 2022 AutoBild Sportscars UHP test
    • 41st/50 wet braking (44.3 m, +28.8% from best) and 44th/50 wet braking on concrete (+26.1%) in 2023 ADAC test
    • 44th/53 wet braking (39.2 m, +32.4% from best) in 2021 Auto Bild braking test
  • Wet Handling / Grip & Stability Strong
    • 11th/11 wet handling (+15.4%) and 11th/11 wet circle (+11.4%) in 2022 AutoBild Sportscars UHP test
    • 29th/44 wet braking (+19.3% from best) in 2022 Summer Tire Market Overview, reinforcing mid-to-poor wet grip trend
  • Aquaplaning Resistance (Straight & Curved) Strong
    • 44th/50 straight aquaplaning (+10.8%) and 40th/50 curved aquaplaning (+22.5%) in 2023 ADAC test
    • 11th/11 straight aquaplaning (+4.8%) and 11th/11 curved aquaplaning (+23.6%) in 2022 AutoBild Sportscars UHP test
  • Overall Competitive Performance (Rankings) Strong
    • 11th/11 overall in 2022 AutoBild Sportscars UHP test
    • 49th/53 overall in 2021 Auto Bild braking-focused test; 37th/50 overall in 2023 ADAC test
  • Wear / Durability & Environmental Abrasion Moderate
    • 42nd/50 wear (31,500 km, +55.9% from best) in 2023 ADAC test
    • Abrasion 75.7 mg/km/t (22nd/50, +117.5% from best) in 2023 ADAC test
Performance Over Time

Test History

37
of 50
2023 ADAC Summer Tire Test

2023
Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Strong:
Tire Weight
11
of 11
2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tire Test

2022
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Strong:
Noise, Price, Rolling Resistance
Weak:
Dry Handling, Curved Aquaplaning, Straight Aqua, Wet Braking, Wet Circle, Wet Handling
24
of 44
2022 Summer Tire Market Overview

2022
Winner: Bridgestone Turanza T005

49
of 53
2021 53 Summer Tire Braking Test

2021
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125