Menu

Superia Bluewin UHP 3 Test Results

2025 1 publication

Tested 1 times by independent publications, the Superia Bluewin UHP 3 averages a finish of 11th.

  • 1Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 11thAverage finish
  • 0%Field beaten on average
  • 1Publications
Superia Bluewin UHP 3

1 test in 2025

The latest test

2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tire Test P11 of 11

The SUPERIA Bluewin UHP 3 is a budget-priced tire with respectable performance on snow and in the dry, but it is deemed "brandgefährlich" (extremely dangerous) in wet conditions. Testers found it to be "unberechenbar" (unpredictable) on the wet handling course, with the vehicle's rear end breaking away abruptly during load changes. Its performance when encountering standing water was called "schlichtweg eine Katastrophe" (simply a catastrophe), and its dangerously long wet braking distances led to the tire being rated as "not recommended".

Weak: Dry Handling, Wet Braking, Wet Handling, Wet Circle, Straight Aqua, Curved Aquaplaning Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Record by discipline

Where the Superia Bluewin UHP 3 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.

Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 1 P9 of 13 33% -
Dry Handling 1 P13 of 13 0% -
Wet
Wet Braking 1 P13 of 13 0% -
Wet Handling 1 P13 of 13 0% -
Wet Circle 1 P13 of 13 0% -
Straight Aqua 1 P13 of 13 0% -
Curved Aquaplaning 1 P12 of 13 8% -
Snow
Snow Braking 1 P11 of 13 17% -
Snow Traction 1 P11 of 13 17% -
Snow Handling 1 P8 of 13 42% -
Comfort
Noise 1 P5 of 13 67% -
Value
Rolling Resistance 1 P9 of 13 33% -

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 1 tests. Updated October 29, 2026.

The Superia Bluewin UHP 3 finished last of 11 overall and Not Recommended in the 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars SUV winter test. Wet braking was last of 13 at 64.5 m, 44% longer than the best, and wet handling and circle grip were also last. Straight aquaplaning resistance was last, 23.2% behind the best, and curved resistance 12th, 36.6% behind. Testers described unpredictable wet handling with abrupt rear breakaway during load changes, and regarded its wet performance as dangerous.

Low purchase price was its clearest attraction, but the favorable dry and snow wording needs qualification. Dry handling was last of 13, and dry braking ninth, 16.2% behind the best. The notes unusually call dry braking joint seventh, while their broadly respectable dry verdict contrasts with the last-place handling result. Snow braking and traction were both 11th of 13, though handling was eighth with speed only 2% below the best. Noise was fifth and rolling resistance ninth. This single comparison identifies major wet-road limitations, with the low price and less extreme deficits elsewhere offering no basis for overlooking its braking and unpredictable behavior.

Performance Strengths

  • Value for money Minor
    Details
    • Lowest purchase price by a wide margin, 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars SUV winter test; still Not Recommended

Performance Weaknesses

  • Wet braking Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • Last of 13, 64.5 m, 44% longer than best, 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars SUV winter test
  • Wet handling Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • Last of 13, speed 7.8% below best; wet circle also last, 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars SUV winter test
  • Aquaplaning resistance Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • Straight last of 13, 23.2% behind best; curved 12th of 13, 36.6% behind, 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars SUV winter test
  • Behavior at the limit Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • Unpredictable wet handling and abrupt rear breakaway during load changes, 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars SUV winter test
  • Dry handling Minor
    Details
    • Last of 13, speed 2.4% below best, despite unusually favorable broad dry verdict, 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars SUV winter test
  • Wet grip Strong in 1 of 1 tests
    Details

Every test, newest first 1

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2025 1 test
P11 of 11 Beat 0% of the field

2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tire Test

Auto Bild Sportscars 235/50 R19

The SUPERIA Bluewin UHP 3 is a budget-priced tire with respectable performance on snow and in the dry, but it is deemed "brandgefährlich" (extremely dangerous) in wet conditions. Testers found it to be "unberechenbar" (unpredictable) on the wet handling course, with the vehicle's rear end breaking away abruptly during load changes. Its performance when encountering standing water was called "schlichtweg eine Katastrophe" (simply a catastrophe), and its dangerously long wet braking distances led to the tire being rated as "not recommended".

WeakDry HandlingWet BrakingWet HandlingWet CircleStraight AquaCurved Aquaplaning WinnerBridgestone Blizzak 6

Back to the Superia Bluewin UHP 3 overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Superia tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.