Menu

Prinx XLAB Comfort EV Test Results

2025 1 publication

Tested 1 times by independent publications, the Prinx XLAB Comfort EV averages a finish of 7th.

  • 1Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 7thAverage finish
  • 0%Field beaten on average
  • 1Publications

1 test in 2025

The latest test

2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tire Test P7 of 7

The Prinx XLAB Comfort EV significantly underperforms across most test categories, raising serious safety concerns particularly in wet conditions. Its wet braking distance (225 feet) is nearly 37% longer than the test-winning Continental, representing a potentially dangerous performance deficit. The Chinese tire also records the slowest wet handling time (94 seconds) and poorest wet circle grip. Despite its "Comfort EV" naming suggesting energy efficiency, it ironically delivers the worst rolling resistance result (6.81 kg/t). The Prinx also falls short in dry performance with the longest dry braking distance and slowest handling time. Its only decent result comes in noise testing, where it places mid-pack. Given its price point (€321) exceeding both the Falken and Nexen while delivering substantially worse performance, the Prinx XLAB Comfort EV cannot be recommended despite its "B" EU wet grip rating.

Weak: Dry Braking, Dry Handling, Subj. Dry Handling, Wet Braking, Wet Handling, Wet Circle, Straight Aqua, Subj. Comfort, Rolling Resistance Winner: Continental UltraContact NXT

Record by discipline

Where the Prinx XLAB Comfort EV finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.

Record by discipline
Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 1 P7 of 7 0% -
Dry Handling 1 P7 of 7 0% -
Subj. Dry Handling 1 P6 of 7 17% -
Wet
Wet Braking 1 P7 of 7 0% -
Wet Handling 1 P7 of 7 0% -
Wet Circle 1 P7 of 7 0% -
Straight Aqua 1 P7 of 7 0% -
Curved Aquaplaning 1 P5 of 7 33% -
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 1 P7 of 7 0% -
Noise 1 P4 of 7 50% -
Value
Rolling Resistance 1 P7 of 7 0% -

Every test, newest first 1

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2025 1 test
P7 of 7 Beat 0% of the field

2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tire Test

Motor 205/55 R16

The Prinx XLAB Comfort EV significantly underperforms across most test categories, raising serious safety concerns particularly in wet conditions. Its wet braking distance (225 feet) is nearly 37% longer than the test-winning Continental, representing a potentially dangerous performance deficit. The Chinese tire also records the slowest wet handling time (94 seconds) and poorest wet circle grip. Despite its "Comfort EV" naming suggesting energy efficiency, it ironically delivers the worst rolling resistance result (6.81 kg/t). The Prinx also falls short in dry performance with the longest dry braking distance and slowest handling time. Its only decent result comes in noise testing, where it places mid-pack. Given its price point (€321) exceeding both the Falken and Nexen while delivering substantially worse performance, the Prinx XLAB Comfort EV cannot be recommended despite its "B" EU wet grip rating.

WeakDry BrakingDry HandlingSubj. Dry HandlingWet BrakingWet HandlingWet CircleStraight AquaSubj. ComfortRolling Resistance WinnerContinental UltraContact NXT

Back to the Prinx XLAB Comfort EV overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Prinx tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.