Menu
Nexen Roadian CT8 View Gallery (1)
165-235/60-80 R13-17 88 sizes 2014

Nexen Roadian CT8

The Nexen Roadian CT8 is a Touring Summer tire designed to be fitted to Vans.

6.8
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
77%
Wet Grip
63%
Road Feedback
80%
Handling
80%
Wear
66%
Comfort
78%
Buy again
38%
6 Reviews
69% Average
39,020 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 12th)
Nexen Roadian CT8

Nexen Roadian CT8

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
6.8 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2019
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 6
Avg Rating: 69%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.03
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2019 ADAC Van 215/65 R16 C Tire Test ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 C 12/16 0 metrics
1
Tests
12th
Average
12th
Best
12th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
12th/16
Top marks in fuel consumption, good in the dry.
Very weak in the wet, relatively high wear.

Alternative Tires

6.9/10
66% 5 reviews
6.0/10
54% 18 reviews
5.9/10
48% 12 reviews
52% 4 reviews

Questions and Answers for the Nexen Roadian CT8

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Nexen Roadian CT8. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Nexen Roadian CT8 Reviews

Given 63% while driving a Peugeot Boxer (215/75 R16) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
Cargo tire with great wear and good dry handling. Unfortunately they are terrible in the wet and the wet characteristics get worse every year as the tire ages. Cornering in the wet is especially bad and feels like a 20 year old tire was fitted. Also very sensitive to temperature, as dry grip decreases significantly if the temps are
October 2, 2023
Given 74% while driving a Citroën Relay (215/70 R15) on a combination of roads for 10,000 easy going miles
Two tires developed bulges after short time of being used, with still plenty of tread left to use.
September 17, 2022
Given 62% while driving a Peugeot Boxer (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 0 average miles
We bought a van with Nexen tires. After one week we had to change first time the front left tire (cause of breaking the steel thread in the tire) The second tire kept for appr. 1 month, and the same situation. Now (after half year) the same condition with the rear left tire. 3 from 4 with normal urban and suburban usage. No overload, no overspeeding. I can’t guess, what happened. Can’t fail anything else, but tires. We’ll try now the Vanhawk. Regarding this I not suggest the Nexen for vans.
June 11, 2020

How would you rate the Nexen Roadian CT8?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Nexen Roadian CT8 Reviews

Given 44% while driving a Fiat BURSTNER i640 (225/70 R15) on mostly motorways for 8,000 easy going miles
The tire pointed ways on the role of the characteristics (higher index of load and speed than the originals). At 11000 km the rear wheel burst on the highway without justifying cause I have also been noticing for a month that it is going to the right with what I suppose, the rest of the tires go the same way. They do not generate confidence in me and also I think they are not good, I have been noticing for a while that they are weird. They only have 10 months of normal use
September 1, 2021
Given 84% while driving a Fiat 1.2 16V (225/65 R17 R) on mostly motorways for 1,000 easy going miles
Fitted 6 of these to my A Class Motorhome in place of Michelin Agilis which had started to crack and bulge a 4 1/2 yrs old....Really pleased with the quality of the Nexen's….we compared them with the Michelin's on removal and the stronger construction of the Nexens was immediately apparent... the drive very well..
June 6, 2020
Given 86% while driving a Volkswagen Crafter (235/65 R16) on a combination of roads for 20 average miles
Nexen Roadian CT8 are the tires I bought instead of previous Infinity tires, which were horrible.
CT8 are actually great choice for the price, I will most probably buy them again. Two seasons done perfect with them, I believe around 30.000 km.
November 24, 2018
Rate the Nexen Roadian CT8