Michelin CrossClimate Test Results
Tested 14 times by independent publications, the Michelin CrossClimate has taken 4 test wins with an average finish of 3rd.
- 14Independent tests
- 4Test wins
- 11Podium finishes
- 3rdAverage finish
- 71%Field beaten on average
- 8Publications
14 tests, 2015 to 2018
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 71%
2018 New and Worn Summer Tire Test P9 of 16
Record by discipline
Where the Michelin CrossClimate finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 4 | P1.8 of 12.5 | 93% | 1 |
| Dry Handling | 4 | P3 of 12.5 | 87% | 2 |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 4 | P4.8 of 12.5 | 70% | - |
| Wet Handling | 4 | P3.5 of 12.5 | 78% | - |
| Straight Aqua | 2 | P4 of 11.5 | 71% | - |
| Snow | ||||
| Snow Braking | 3 | P6.3 of 11 | 47% | - |
| Snow Handling | 3 | P7 of 11 | 41% | - |
| Comfort | ||||
| Noise | 3 | P4 of 13.3 | 71% | 1 |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 1 | P4 of 12 | 73% | - |
| Value | 1 | P8 of 12 | 36% | - |
| Rolling Resistance | 3 | P3.7 of 11 | 74% | - |
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Michelin CrossClimate. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 27% | |
| 11 | 10 | 1 | - | 91% | |
| 11 | 7 | 4 | - | 64% | |
| 9 | 9 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 8 | 7 | 1 | - | 88% | |
| 7 | 7 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% |
Against its own line
The same record for the tire it replaced and the tire that replaced it.
| Tire | Tests | Wins | Avg finish | Field beaten |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin CrossClimate This tire | 14 | 4 | 3rd | 71% |
| Michelin CrossClimate+ Successor | 27 | 5 | 4th | 64% |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 14 tests. Updated September 15, 2025.
Michelin CrossClimate shows a clear summer-biased all-season pattern: outstanding dry performance, competitive wet capability, and acceptable but not class-leading snow. Across 14 tests it averages 3.1 overall with multiple wins and podiums in major 2016-2017 comparisons, often praised for dry braking/handling and strong wet braking versus all-season rivals. One notable outlier is the 2018 ADAC all-season test where it placed last in class, highlighting variability in broader winter metrics and ADAC's weighting. Noise performance is often good to excellent, and rolling resistance is generally favorable.
Overall, its strengths cluster in dry and general all-season balance with repeated test wins (2016-2017). Weaknesses emerge in deep winter/snow handling and isolated wet braking variability in some tests. Value can be mid-pack due to price, but durability/wear results are solid when measured.
Performance Strengths
-
Dry Performance
Strong
Details
- 1st place dry braking and dry handling in 2017 Auto Zeitung All Season vs Winter test (39.4 m, 59.7 s)
- 2nd dry braking and 1st dry handling in 2017 Auto Bild All Season 225/50 R17 (37.9 m; 82.7 km/h)
-
Wet Braking/Overall Wet Capability (vs all-season peers)
Moderate
Details
- 2016 AutoBild All Season: 'shortest wet braking' and overall test win
- 2017 Auto Bild All Season 225/50 R17: 2nd wet braking (+4.4% from best), 4th wet handling (+2.5%)
-
Overall All-Season Balance/Awards
Strong
Details
- Test winner in 2016 Auto Bild All Season (1/10) and 2016 ADAC All Season (1/7)
- 1st overall in 2017 Auto Zeitung All Season vs Winter (1/11) and 1st in 2017 Auto Bild All Season 225/50 R17 (tie)
-
Noise/Comfort
Moderate
Details
- 2018 Auto Navigator Summer: 1st place noise (57.8 dB)
- Multiple mid-to-good placements in NVH mentions across tests
-
Efficiency/Rolling Resistance and Wear
Moderate
Details
- 2017 Auto Bild All Season 205/55 R16: 3rd rolling resistance (+10.2% from best), 4th wear (+8.6% from best)
- 2017 Auto Bild All Season 225/50 R17: 2nd rolling resistance (+6.7% from best)
-
Dry grip
Strong
in 7 of 13 tests
Details
good in the dry
- 2018 ADAC All Season Tire Test (2018)with a particular strength in the dry and wet
- 2017 All Season Tire Test (2017)As good as a summer tire on dry roads, short wet braking distances, low rolling resistance
- 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (2017)Excellent in the dry, but weaker in the snow and aquaplaning tests
- 2016 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2016)Top performance on dry and wet surfaces
- 2016 AutoBild All Season Tire Test (2016)
-
Wet grip
Strong
in 6 of 13 tests
Details
with a particular strength in the dry and wet
- 2017 All Season Tire Test (2017)good in the wet
- 2017 All Season VS Winter Tire Test (2017)Top performance on dry and wet surfaces
- 2016 AutoBild All Season Tire Test (2016)Top marks dry and wet
- 2016 ADAC All Season Tire Test (2016)It equaled the test winning Goodyear in the wet
- 2016 AMS SUV All Season Tire Test (2016)
-
Dry handling
Strong
in 5 of 13 tests
Details
excellent dry handling
- 2017 All Season VS Winter Tire Test (2017)won the dry testing by a margin
- 2016 AMS SUV All Season Tire Test (2016)Good handling, best steering feel and short braking distances on dry surfaces
- 2016 GF All Season Tire Test (2016)good handling on dry roads
- 2016 AZ Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 (2016)dynamic dry handling
- 2015 AutoBild All Season Tire Test (2015)
-
Dry braking
Strong
in 5 of 13 tests
Details
very short dry braking
- 2017 All Season VS Winter Tire Test (2017)Best wet and dry braking
- 2016 ACE All Season Tire Test (2016)short braking distances on dry surfaces
- 2016 GF All Season Tire Test (2016)short braking distances
- 2016 AZ Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 (2016)shortest dry braking
- 2015 AutoBild All Season Tire Test (2015)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Snow/Winter Traction and Handling
Strong
Details
- 2017 Auto Bild All Season 205/55 R16: 8th snow braking (+7%), 8th snow handling (+4%)
- 2017 Auto Zeitung All Season vs Winter: 10th snow handling (+6.8%), 6th snow braking (+9%)
-
Wet Braking Variability
Moderate
Details
- 2018 Auto Navigator Summer: 9th wet braking (+14.8% from best)
- 2016 Auto Express All Season: wet braking 7% worse than test-winning Goodyear
-
Value/Purchase Price
Moderate
Details
- 2017 Auto Bild All Season 205/55 R16: Value 8th/12 (+54.7% from best)
- Consistently premium pricing mentioned relative to peers
-
Dry Handling vs Best-in-class (non-summer tests)
Minor
Details
- 2018 Auto Navigator Summer: 8th dry handling (+9.6% from best) despite strong dry braking
- Several tests note summer-tire-like behavior but occasional handling drop-offs
-
Outlier Overall Result
Moderate
Details
- 2018 ADAC All Season: 9th/11 (last among all-season set) despite strong history elsewhere
-
Snow traction
Strong
in 5 of 13 tests
Details
Weak on snow
- 2018 ADAC All Season Tire Test (2018)Excellent in the dry, but weaker in the snow and aquaplaning tests
- 2016 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2016)couldn't match the winter-bias all season Goodyear in the snow
- 2016 AMS SUV All Season Tire Test (2016)Weak on snow
- 2016 ADAC All Season Tire Test (2016)The lack of sipes has a negative impact on performance in the snow, where Michelin lagged behind rivals
- 2015 French All Season Tire Test (2015)
-
Aquaplaning resistance
Strong
in 3 of 13 tests
Details
with only aquaplaning stopping it winning every test other than snow
- 2016 ACE All Season Tire Test (2016)Poor resistance to lateral aquaplaning (2mm less starting tread depth than full winter tires)
- 2016 AZ Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 (2016)Excellent in the dry, but weaker in the snow and aquaplaning tests
- 2016 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2016)
-
Snow handling
Moderate
in 2 of 13 tests
Details
Weak snow handling
- 2017 All Season VS Winter Tire Test (2017)On snowy roads you need to go slowly and carefully
- 2015 French All Season Tire Test (2015)
-
Snow braking
Moderate
in 2 of 13 tests
Details
relatively long braking distance on snow
- 2016 GF All Season Tire Test (2016)Long braking distance on snow
- 2016 AutoBild All Season Tire Test (2016)
Do owners agree with the tests?
Every tester write-up on the Michelin CrossClimate (13 tests) and 132 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.
Where owners and testers agree
- Wet grip strength in 6 of 13 tests 57 praise, 13 criticise of 132 reviews · Read those reviews
- Dry grip strength in 7 of 13 tests 53 praise, 6 criticise of 132 reviews · Read those reviews
- Tread life strength in 3 of 13 tests 35 praise, 4 criticise of 132 reviews · Read those reviews
- Wet braking strength in 3 of 13 tests 10 praise, 4 criticise of 132 reviews · Read those reviews
- Dry braking strength in 5 of 13 tests 5 praise, 1 criticise of 132 reviews · Read those reviews
- Wet handling strength in 1 of 13 tests 7 praise, 3 criticise of 132 reviews · Read those reviews
Raised by owners, not by any test of this tire
- Road noise no test mentions it 40 praise, 5 criticise of 132 reviews · Read those reviews
- Ride comfort no test mentions it 23 praise, 0 criticise of 132 reviews · Read those reviews
Every test, newest first 14
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
2016 Auto Express All Season Tire Test
Excellent in the dry, but weaker in the snow and aquaplaning tests.
2016 AMS SUV All Season Tire Test
As the only summer bias all season tire in the test, the Michelin CrossClimate won the dry testing by a margin. It equaled the test winning Goodyear in the wet, but couldn't match the winter-bias all season Goodyear in the snow and ice. The best choice for climates which don't see heavy snowfall.
2016 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
Excellent
2016 ACE All Season Tire Test
Best wet and dry braking, with only aquaplaning stopping it winning every test other than snow. Surprisingly capable with snow traction and braking makes the CrossClimate the ideal choice for climates which don't see a lot of snow
2015 French All Season Tire Test
As the only summer optimized all season tire on test, the Michelin dominated all tests on dry and wet surfaces, partly due to the lack of siping. The lack of sipes has a negative impact on performance in the snow, where Michelin lagged behind rivals. On snowy roads you need to go slowly and carefully.
Back to the Michelin CrossClimate overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Michelin tires

