Menu

Leao Nova Force Acro Test Results

Tested 2025 to 2026 2 publications

Tested 2 times by independent publications, the Leao Nova Force Acro averages a finish of 22nd.

  • 2Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 22ndAverage finish
  • 26%Field beaten on average
  • 2Publications

2 tests, 2025 to 2026

The latest test

2026 ADAC Summer Tire Test P15 of 16

Leao’s Nova-Force Acro, a sub-brand of Linglong, receives a “not recommendable” verdict. It fails to achieve even a satisfactory rating in safety because of very weak dry performance; the tire loses grip as temperature rises, provides delayed steering response and feels elastic, making it difficult to hit the correct steering angle. At the limit it tends to oversteer and proves hard to control. Wet-road performance is merely adequate; braking and aquaplaning behavior are average, and handling is only sufficient. The environmental rating is also only adequate due to very low predicted mileage, high abrasion and high weight; efficiency is saved only by modest fuel consumption. ADAC notes that the tire’s only strengths are a very short dry-braking distance and low fuel consumption, while weaknesses include very poor performance on both dry and wet surfaces, low mileage, high abrasion and above-average weight.

Weak: Straight Aqua, Curved Aquaplaning, Wear, Abrasion Winner: Continental PremiumContact 7

Record by discipline

Where the Leao Nova Force Acro finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.

Record by discipline
Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 2 P18.5 of 34 52% -
Wet
Wet Braking 2 P17.5 of 34 51% -
Wet Braking - Concrete 1 P13 of 16 20% -
Straight Aqua 1 P15 of 16 7% -
Curved Aquaplaning 1 P16 of 16 0% -
Value
Wear 1 P15 of 16 7% -
Fuel Consumption 1 P4 of 16 80% -
Abrasion 1 P15 of 16 7% -

Every test, newest first 2

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2026 1 test
P15 of 16 Beat 7% of the field

2026 ADAC Summer Tire Test

ADAC 225/50 R17

Leao’s Nova-Force Acro, a sub-brand of Linglong, receives a “not recommendable” verdict. It fails to achieve even a satisfactory rating in safety because of very weak dry performance; the tire loses grip as temperature rises, provides delayed steering response and feels elastic, making it difficult to hit the correct steering angle. At the limit it tends to oversteer and proves hard to control. Wet-road performance is merely adequate; braking and aquaplaning behavior are average, and handling is only sufficient. The environmental rating is also only adequate due to very low predicted mileage, high abrasion and high weight; efficiency is saved only by modest fuel consumption. ADAC notes that the tire’s only strengths are a very short dry-braking distance and low fuel consumption, while weaknesses include very poor performance on both dry and wet surfaces, low mileage, high abrasion and above-average weight.

WeakStraight AquaCurved AquaplaningWearAbrasion WinnerContinental PremiumContact 7

2025 1 test

Back to the Leao Nova Force Acro overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Leao tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.