Menu

Kleber Dynaxer UHP - Test Results

Test Statistics

7

Tests Completed

15th

Average Position

10th

Best Result

20th

Worst Result

Performance Analysis

Kleber Dynaxer UHP - Official Image

Across seven summer tests, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP delivers solid efficiency and comfort traits but consistently lags in dynamic wet and dry performance. It repeatedly posts excellent rolling resistance and low noise, with above-average wear and good value, yet ranks mid-to-lower tier overall due to weak wet handling/braking and below-par dry dynamics. Aquaplaning resistance is mixed, occasionally decent in straight-line tests but poor in curved aquaplaning, reinforcing a pattern of limited wet grip and stability.

Performance Strengths
  • Efficiency (Rolling Resistance) Strong
    • 2/22 rolling resistance in 2023 AutoBild UHP (+7.3% from best)
    • 2/15 rolling resistance in 2021 Auto Bild 19" (+6.3% from best)
    • 6/20 rolling resistance in 2019 Auto Bild (+20% from best)
  • Noise/Comfort Strong
    • 1/21 pass-by noise in 2023 AutoBild UHP
    • 5/15 noise in 2021 Auto Bild (+0.6% from best)
    • 6/20 noise in 2019 Auto Bild (+0.7% from best)
    • 3/20 subjective comfort in 2019 Auto Bild
  • Wear and Value Moderate
    • 5/20 wear in 2023 AutoBild UHP (+31% from best)
    • 8/20 wear in 2020 Auto Bild (+29% from best)
    • 10/20 wear in 2019 Auto Bild (+28% from best)
    • 6/20 value in 2023 AutoBild UHP (+37.1% from best)
    • 9/20 value in 2020 Auto Bild (+27.8% from best)
  • Straight-Line Aquaplaning (Occasional) Minor
    • 8/21 straight aquaplaning in 2023 AutoBild UHP (+5.9% from best)
    • 12/15 straight aquaplaning in 2021 Auto Bild (+7.2% from best)
Performance Weaknesses
  • Wet Weather Performance Strong
    • 18/21 wet braking (+12.9%) and 20/22 wet handling (+6.5%) in 2023 AutoBild UHP
    • 16/20 wet braking (+12.5%) and 19/20 wet handling (+7.9%) in 2020 Auto Bild
    • 17/20 wet braking (+11.8%) and 20/20 wet handling (+6.4%) in 2019 Auto Bild
    • Curved aquaplaning 19/21 (+21.6%) in 2023; 14/15 (+22.9%) in 2021
  • Dry Dynamic Performance Strong
    • 18/21 dry braking (+8.1%) and 13/21 dry handling (+2.9%) in 2023 AutoBild UHP
    • 13/15 dry braking (+9.9%) and 13/15 dry handling (+3.3%) in 2021 Auto Bild
    • 18/20 dry handling (+2.4%) in 2020 Auto Bild; 18/20 dry handling (+2%) in 2019 Auto Bild
  • Overall Competitiveness Moderate
    • 17/21 overall in 2023 AutoBild UHP
    • 15/20 overall in 2020 Auto Bild
    • 16/20 overall in 2019 Auto Bild
    • Average overall position 15.1 across 7 tests
Performance Over Time

Test History

17
of 21
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test

2023
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Strong:
Noise, Rolling Resistance
20
of 48
2023 Summer Tire Market Overview

2023
Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3

10
of 15
2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tire Test

2021
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Satisfactory.
Strong:
Rolling Resistance
Weak:
Curved Aquaplaning
15
of 20
2020 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test

2020
Winner: Continental Premium Contact 6

Satisfactory.
Weak:
Wet Handling
13
of 49
2020 Tire Market Overview Braking Test

2020
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4

16
of 20
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test

2019
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Conditionally recommended.
Weak:
Wet Handling
15
of 45
2019 Summer 53 Tire Braking Shootout

2019
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5