Hoosier TrackAttack Pro - Test Results
Test Statistics
2
Tests Completed1st
Average Position1st
Best Result1st
Worst ResultPerformance Analysis
Across two summer track-focused comparisons, the Hoosier TrackAttack Pro shows front-running outright pace, taking 1st overall in both tests (1/3 in 2024 and 1/3 in 2025) and earning a “Highly recommended” award in 2025. Its strongest pattern is performance in objective lap-time metrics, particularly in longer-run dry handling where it led in the 2025 test.
However, results are not universally dominant: in the 2024 Hoosier-only comparison it placed last in every dry handling-related sub-metric (including subjective scoring) despite winning overall, indicating sensitivity to test context/competition (e.g., versus Hoosier slick/R-compound) and possible variability in driver feel and peak grip versus ultimate race rubber. Evidence is limited to dry conditions only, so broader road/ wet capability cannot be inferred from this dataset.
Performance Strengths
-
Overall Track Performance (Dry Lap Time Focus)
Strong
Details
• 1st overall (1/3) in 2024 'Hoosier TrackAttack Pro vs R7 vs Slick' test
• 1st overall (1/3) with 'Highly recommended' award in 2025 'Cup 2 R vs TrackAttack Pro vs RE71RS' test
-
Dry Handling Consistency / Long-Run Pace
Moderate
Details
• 1st place Dry Handling in 2025: 86.0 s (Position 1/3)
• 1st place Dry Handling Long Run in 2025: 86.83 s (Position 1/3)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Dry Handling vs Race-Level Hoosier Competition (Context Sensitivity)
Strong
Details
• 3rd place Dry Handling in 2024: 64.9 s (Position 3/3, +3% from best)
• 3rd place Dry Handling Long Run in 2024: 66.3 s (Position 3/3, +3.6% from best)
-
Driver Feel / Subjective Handling Scores
Moderate
Details
• 3rd place Subjective Dry Handling in 2024: 9.25 points (Position 3/3, +7.5% from best)
• Only 2nd place Subjective Dry Handling in 2025: 9.75 points (Position 2/3, +2.5% from best)
-
Autocross/Low-Speed Agility (Not Class-Leading)
Minor
Details
• 2nd place Dry Handling - Autocross in 2025: 41.06 s (Position 2/3, +0.6% from best)
• Despite 1st overall in 2025, autocross result suggests its advantage is stronger in full-lap track running than tight-course performance
Test History
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R vs Hoosier TrackAttack Pro vs Bridgestone Potenza RE71 RS Highly Rec.
2025
Dry Handling, Dry Handling - Autocross, Dry Handling Long Run, Subj. Dry Handling
Dry Handling, Dry Handling Long Run, Subj. Dry Handling