Menu

Greentrac Quest X Test Results

2026 1 publication

Tested 1 times by independent publications, the Greentrac Quest X averages a finish of 13th.

  • 1Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 13thAverage finish
  • 20%Field beaten on average
  • 1Publications

1 test in 2026

The latest test

2026 ADAC Summer Tire Test P13 of 16

The Chinese Greentrac Quest-X receives a conditional recommendation. The summary criticises its wet-road performance: wet braking is the worst in the test, and aquaplaning behavior and handling are only fair. Dry-road feedback and precision are also not very good due to an elastic rear axle, though braking is good. Environmental performance is fair because of moderate mileage, slightly high abrasion and high weight, although fuel consumption is low. Strengths include short dry braking, good cross-aquaplaning and low fuel consumption, while weaknesses comprise deficits in dry handling, wet performance and moderate mileage with slightly high abrasion.

Strong: Curved Aquaplaning Weak: Wet Braking, Wet Braking - Concrete Winner: Continental PremiumContact 7

Record by discipline

Where the Greentrac Quest X finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.

Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 1 P11 of 16 33% -
Wet
Wet Braking 1 P16 of 16 0% -
Wet Braking - Concrete 1 P16 of 16 0% -
Straight Aqua 1 P11 of 16 33% -
Curved Aquaplaning 1 P1 of 16 100% 1
Value
Wear 1 P9 of 16 47% -
Fuel Consumption 1 P12 of 16 27% -
Abrasion 1 P9 of 16 47% -

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 1 tests. Updated October 29, 2026.

The Greentrac Quest X finished 13th of 16 with a conditional recommendation in ADAC's 2026 summer test. Its clearest strength was curved aquaplaning resistance, sharing first place, but straight aquaplaning was only 11th, 5% behind the best. That standing-water result does not extend to wet stopping: it was last on both asphalt and concrete, with distances of 37.9 m and 44.5 m, respectively 25.9% and 37.8% longer than the best. Wet handling was described as only fair.

Dry-road precision was another limitation, with an elastic rear-axle feel reducing feedback and accuracy. Dry braking was 11th of 16, 6.8% longer than the best, so the overall verdict's praise for short stops is unusually favorable beside the placing and the separate description of mid-field braking. Projected life and abrasion were both ninth of 16, at 38,200 km and 83 mg/km/t, so neither is an outstanding advantage. Fuel-use praise also needs qualification: consumption was 12th of 16, 5.6% above the best, an unusual mismatch with the low-consumption wording. The tire was also relatively heavy. This single test supports good aquaplaning resistance in bends, but identifies substantial wet-braking and steering compromises.

Performance Strengths

  • Aquaplaning resistance Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • Joint-best curved result, 1st of 16 at 3.7 m/sec2, 2026 ADAC test
    • Straight aquaplaning only 11th of 16, 5% behind best, same test

Performance Weaknesses

  • Wet braking Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • Last of 16 on asphalt, 37.9 m, 25.9% longer than best, 2026 ADAC test
    • Last of 16 on concrete, 44.5 m, 37.8% longer than best, same test
  • Wet handling Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • Only fair wet handling, 2026 ADAC test
  • Steering feel Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • Elastic rear-axle feel reduced dry feedback and precision, 2026 ADAC test
  • Rolling resistance Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • Fuel use 12th of 16, 5.7 l/100km, 5.6% above best; unusually favorable low-consumption prose, 2026 ADAC test

Every test, newest first 1

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2026 1 test
P13 of 16 Beat 20% of the field

2026 ADAC Summer Tire Test

ADAC 225/50 R17

The Chinese Greentrac Quest-X receives a conditional recommendation. The summary criticises its wet-road performance: wet braking is the worst in the test, and aquaplaning behavior and handling are only fair. Dry-road feedback and precision are also not very good due to an elastic rear axle, though braking is good. Environmental performance is fair because of moderate mileage, slightly high abrasion and high weight, although fuel consumption is low. Strengths include short dry braking, good cross-aquaplaning and low fuel consumption, while weaknesses comprise deficits in dry handling, wet performance and moderate mileage with slightly high abrasion.

StrongCurved Aquaplaning WeakWet BrakingWet Braking - Concrete WinnerContinental PremiumContact 7

Back to the Greentrac Quest X overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Greentrac tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.