P48 of 51
Beat 7% of the field
Formula Energy Test Results
Tested 2014 to 2017
2 publications
Tested 3 times by independent publications, the Formula Energy averages a finish of 31st.
- 3Independent tests
- 0Test wins
- 0Podium finishes
- 31stAverage finish
- 23%Field beaten on average
- 2Publications
3 tests, 2014 to 2017
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 23%
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Formula Energy. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Michelin Primacy 3
3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind
|
3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
Every test, newest first 3
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
2017 1 test
2016 1 test
P33 of 50
Beat 35% of the field
2014 1 test
P12 of 16
Beat 27% of the field
2014 Auto Review Summer Tire Test - 205/55 R16
After Pirelli acquired two Russian tire plants, the need arose and a new brand under which Russian refineries would be issue "second line" tires. Formula tires made ​​on the new equipment in Voronezh, and in the same factory also produce tires for Pirelli. Asymmetric tire tread Formula Energy means the Formula resists aquaplaning almost as well as Pirelli, but the wet asphalt, where the rubber composition is important, the Formula lags behind, but are good for the second line subgroup. On dry roads the performance is average, and for acoustic comfort and smoothness they are better than more expensive tires like Nokian and Bridgestone. And in the final ranking Formula tires are higher than Bridgestone: on one step with tires Yokohama. The debut is a success.
Back to the Formula Energy overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Formula tires