Menu

Continental Cross Contact UHP Test Results

Tested 2010 to 2016 3 publications

Tested 3 times by independent publications, the Continental Cross Contact UHP has taken 3 test wins with an average finish of 1st.

  • 3Independent tests
  • 3Test wins
  • 3Podium finishes
  • 1stAverage finish
  • 100%Field beaten on average
  • 3Publications

3 tests, 2010 to 2016

Share of the field beaten in each test, oldest to newest. Hover or tap a point for the test.
  • Test win
  • Second
  • Third
  • Average 100%
The latest test

2016 Off Road Summer SUV Tire Test P1 of 6

Highly recommended

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 3 tests. Updated October 28, 2026.

The Continental Cross Contact UHP won all three SUV and 4x4 summer comparisons in its history: first of eight in the 2010 Auto Zeitung 4x4 Tire Test, first of nine in the 2013 Auto Bild SUV / 4X4 Tire Test and first of six in the 2016 Off Road Summer SUV Tire Test. Wet braking is the clearest repeated discipline strength. Auto Bild praised short wet and dry stopping distances in 2013, while Off Road highlighted short wet braking, good wet handling and low rolling resistance in 2016, calling it Highly recommended. Auto Zeitung described good results across the key tests, without identifying an individual discipline advantage.

The wins came with qualifications. Off Road criticised a tendency to understeer on dry roads and a high price, while Auto Bild noted increased running noise, average comfort and average curved aquaplaning. Its 2013 off-road ability also earned praise, but that is one assessment rather than a repeated finding. No individual discipline positions or margins accompany these verdicts, so the overall consistency is clearer than the size of any performance lead. These tests date from 2010 to 2016 and establish a strong historical record, rather than confirming its competitiveness against newer SUV tires.

Performance Strengths

  • Wet braking Moderate in 2 of 3 tests
    Details
    • Short wet stops praised, 2013 Auto Bild SUV / 4X4 Tire Test.
    • Short wet braking praised, 2016 Off Road Summer SUV Tire Test.
  • Dry braking Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
    • Short dry stopping distances praised, 2013 Auto Bild SUV / 4X4 Tire Test.
  • Wet handling Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
    • Good wet handling praised, 2016 Off Road Summer SUV Tire Test.
  • Rolling resistance Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
    • Low rolling resistance praised, 2016 Off Road Summer SUV Tire Test.
  • Off-road traction Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
    • Strong off-road ability praised, 2013 Auto Bild SUV / 4X4 Tire Test.

Performance Weaknesses

  • Behavior at the limit Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
    • Dry-road understeer tendency criticised, 2016 Off Road Summer SUV Tire Test.
  • Road noise Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
    • Increased running noise criticised, 2013 Auto Bild SUV / 4X4 Tire Test.

Do owners agree with the tests?

Every tester write-up on the Continental Cross Contact UHP (3 tests) and 31 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.

Raised by owners, not by any test of this tire

Flagged by testers, not mentioned by owners

  • Wet braking strength in 2 of 3 tests no owner mentions it

Every test, newest first 3

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2016 1 test
2013 1 test
2010 1 test
P1 of 8 Beat 100% of the field

2010 Auto Zeitung 4x4 Tire Test

Auto Zeitung 255/55 r18

The Continental Cross-ContactUHP scores well in all the key tests to win overall

Back to the Continental Cross Contact UHP overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Continental tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.