P40 of 51
Beat 19% of the field
Atlas Polarbear 2 Test Results
Tested 2016 to 2020
1 publication
Tested 2 times by independent publications, the Atlas Polarbear 2 averages a finish of 37th.
- 2Independent tests
- 0Test wins
- 0Podium finishes
- 37thAverage finish
- 20%Field beaten on average
- 1Publications
2 tests, 2016 to 2020
Record by discipline
Where the Atlas Polarbear 2 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 1 | P40 of 49 | 19% | - |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 2 tests. Updated October 29, 2026.
The Atlas Polarbear 2 finished towards the lower end of two Auto Bild winter market overviews: 34th of 49 in 2016 and 40th of 51 in 2020. The latter test measured a wet stopping distance of 39.6 m, 40th of 49 for that discipline and 30.7% longer than the best. Wet braking is therefore the clearest identifiable weakness.
The 2016 overall result offers context but no separate discipline results to explain it. These two entries do not establish snow or ice ability, dry-road performance, comfort, efficiency or wear, and identify no specific strength to balance the measured wet-braking deficit.
Performance Weaknesses
-
Wet braking
Minor
Details
- 39.6 m, 40th of 49 and 30.7% longer than best, 2020 Auto Bild winter market overview
Every test, newest first 2
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
Back to the Atlas Polarbear 2 overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Atlas tires