BFGoodrich gGrip vs Zeetex HP2000 vfm
The BFGoodrich gGrip and the Zeetex HP2000 vfm have met in one independent test so far, and the gGrip finished ahead. The gGrip was stronger in dry and wet.
Performance profile
Their shared test recorded too few of the same measurements to chart, so the chart starts from each tire's Tire Reviews Score categories: its whole record, not the shared test.
Where each scores higher
gGrip
HP2000 vfm
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
gGrip
HP2000 vfm
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the gGrip 84% from 47 reviews and the HP2000 vfm 72% from 8. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tires' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tire that did better.
| Measurement | gGrip | Gap | HP2000 vfm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry gGrip ahead | |||
| Dry Braking ft | 120 | 5.7% | 127 |
| Wet gGrip ahead | |||
| Wet Braking ft | 118 | 1.1% | 119 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2019
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | gGrip | Field | HP2000 vfm |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Summer 53 Tire Braking Shootout | P31 of 53 | P45 of 53 |
gGrip vs HP2000 vfm: your questions
Is the BFGoodrich gGrip or the Zeetex HP2000 vfm the better tire?
The BFGoodrich gGrip and the Zeetex HP2000 vfm have met in one independent test so far, and the gGrip finished ahead. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the gGrip scores 6.6 and the HP2000 vfm 6.6 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the gGrip or the HP2000 vfm?
The gGrip led 1 of the 1 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The gGrip led 1 of the 1 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.5/10 for the gGrip and 8/10 for the HP2000 vfm.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the gGrip 84% from 47 reviews and the HP2000 vfm 72% from 8. 87% of gGrip owners would buy it again, against 83% for the HP2000 vfm.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The gGrip is made in 32 sizes (14 to 19 inch) and the HP2000 vfm in 41 (15 to 19 inch). 10 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the gGrip is graded B for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the HP2000 vfm B and C.
Which is the newer tire?
The HP2000 vfm is the newer design: it reached the market in 2016, the gGrip in 2009.
More comparisons with these tires
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.

