Hankook Weatherflex GT vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW
Ahead in each discipline
The Hankook Weatherflex GT and the Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW have met in one independent test so far, and the CrossClimate 2 AW finished ahead. The Weatherflex GT was stronger in comfort, the CrossClimate 2 AW in dry, snow, ice and value.
Performance profile
19 measurements from the one shared test, each tire shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
Weatherflex GT
CrossClimate 2 AW
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
Weatherflex GT
CrossClimate 2 AW
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tires' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tire that did better.
| Measurement | Weatherflex GT | Gap | CrossClimate 2 AW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry CrossClimate 2 AW ahead | |||
| Dry Braking ft | 138 | 8% | 127 |
| Dry Handling s | 77.37 | 0.1% | 77.43 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | 8.3 | 3.6% | 8.6 |
| Wet Level | |||
| Wet Braking ft | 108 | 1.8% | 106 |
| Wet Handling s | 74.17 | 1% | 74.89 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | 8.4 | 2.4% | 8.2 |
| Wet Circle s | 13.6 | 1.4% | 13.41 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 46.2 | 0.5% | 46.4 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 10 | 15.5% | 8.7 |
| Snow CrossClimate 2 AW ahead | |||
| Snow Braking ft | 56 | 6% | 52 |
| Snow Traction s | 4.02 | 6.7% | 3.75 |
| Snow Handling s | 86.92 | 3% | 84.27 |
| Subj. Snow Handling pts | 8.1 | 6.2% | 8.6 |
| Snow Cornering g | 0.33 | 10.2% | 0.36 |
| Ice CrossClimate 2 AW ahead | |||
| Ice Braking ft | 21 | 6.1% | 20 |
| Ice Traction s | 6.34 | 14.4% | 5.43 |
| Comfort Weatherflex GT ahead | |||
| Subj. Comfort pts | 10 | 11.1% | 9 |
| Noise dB | 74.5 | 0.2 dB | 74.7 |
| Value CrossClimate 2 AW ahead | |||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 9.15 | 0.1% | 9.14 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Weatherflex GT | Field | CrossClimate 2 AW |
|---|---|---|---|
| The BEST All Weather Tires for 2026/27 | P3 of 8 | P1 of 8 |
Weatherflex GT vs CrossClimate 2 AW: your questions
Is the Hankook Weatherflex GT or the Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW the better tire?
The Hankook Weatherflex GT and the Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW have met in one independent test so far, and the CrossClimate 2 AW finished ahead. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Weatherflex GT scores 8.5 and the CrossClimate 2 AW 9.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Weatherflex GT or the CrossClimate 2 AW?
Across the shared tests the wet measurements are split 3-3 between the Weatherflex GT and the CrossClimate 2 AW.
Which is better in the dry?
The CrossClimate 2 AW led 2 of the 3 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The CrossClimate 2 AW led 5 of the 5 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the CrossClimate 2 AW 87% from 11 reviews; the Weatherflex GT has no owner reviews yet.
More comparisons with these tires
Every Hankook vs Michelin test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tires →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.

