Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Compasal Crosstop AS II
Ahead in each discipline
The Laufenn G Fit 4S and the Compasal Crosstop AS II have met in one independent test so far, and the G Fit 4S finished ahead. The G Fit 4S was stronger in dry, wet and snow, the Crosstop AS II in comfort and value.
Performance profile
15 measurements from the one shared test, each tire shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
G Fit 4S
Crosstop AS II
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 85%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tires' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tire that did better.
| Measurement | G Fit 4S | Gap | Crosstop AS II |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry G Fit 4S ahead | |||
| Dry Braking ft | 145 | 0.5% | 144 |
| Dry Handling s | 53.53 | 3.1% | 55.27 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | 7 | 27.3% | 5.5 |
| Wet G Fit 4S ahead | |||
| Wet Braking ft | 170 | 9.6% | 188 |
| Wet Handling s | 89.7 | 5.8% | 95.2 |
| Wet Circle g | 0.72 | 13.3% | 0.63 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 50.1 | 14% | 44 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 10 | 52.2% | 6.6 |
| Snow G Fit 4S ahead | |||
| Snow Braking ft | 95 | 10.2% | 106 |
| Snow Traction (ft) | 31 | 7.4% | 33 |
| Snow Traction (lbf) | 574 | 10.4% | 520 |
| Snow Handling s | 85.2 | 3.3% | 88.1 |
| Comfort Crosstop AS II ahead | |||
| Subj. Comfort pts | 6 | 8.3% | 6.5 |
| Noise dB | 66 | 0.5 dB | 65.5 |
| Value Crosstop AS II ahead | |||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 9.42 | 12.4% | 8.25 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | G Fit 4S | Field | Crosstop AS II |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Motor All Season Tire Test | P5 of 8 | P8 of 8 |
G Fit 4S vs Crosstop AS II: your questions
Is the Laufenn G Fit 4S or the Compasal Crosstop AS II the better tire?
The Laufenn G Fit 4S and the Compasal Crosstop AS II have met in one independent test so far, and the G Fit 4S finished ahead.
Which is better in the wet, the G Fit 4S or the Crosstop AS II?
The G Fit 4S led 5 of the 5 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. It held 52.2% more grip in curved aquaplaning in the one shared test that measured it.
Which is better in the dry?
The G Fit 4S led 2 of the 3 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. It lapped the dry handling course 3.1% faster in the one shared test that measured it.
Which is better in snow?
The G Fit 4S led 4 of the 4 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. It stopped 10.2% shorter on snow in the one shared test that measured it.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Crosstop AS II had 12.4% lower rolling resistance (1 test).
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Crosstop AS II was 0.5 dB quieter (1 test).
What do owners say?
Owners rate the G Fit 4S 88% from 9 reviews; the Crosstop AS II has no owner reviews yet.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The G Fit 4S is made in 78 sizes (13 to 20 inch) and the Crosstop AS II in 51 (14 to 20 inch). 44 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the G Fit 4S is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Crosstop AS II C and C.
Which is the newer tire?
The Crosstop AS II is the newer design: it reached the market in 2022, the G Fit 4S in 2021.
More comparisons with these tires
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.