Ovation Ecovision VI 682 vs Linglong Comfort Master
Ahead in each discipline
The Ovation Ecovision VI 682 and the Linglong Comfort Master have met in one independent test so far, and the Comfort Master finished ahead. The Ecovision VI 682 was stronger in wet, the Comfort Master in dry.
Performance profile
Their shared test recorded too few of the same measurements to chart, so the chart shows what owners rate each tire on every question.
Where owners rate each higher
Ecovision VI 682
Not ahead in any category
Comfort Master
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Ecovision VI 682 45% from 9 reviews and the Comfort Master 65% from 9. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tires' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tire that did better.
| Measurement | Ecovision VI 682 | Gap | Comfort Master |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Comfort Master ahead | |||
| Dry Braking ft | 130 | 2.5% | 127 |
| Wet Ecovision VI 682 ahead | |||
| Wet Braking ft | 107 | 3% | 110 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Ecovision VI 682 | Field | Comfort Master |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Summer Tire Market Overview | P36 of 55 | P35 of 55 |
Ecovision VI 682 vs Comfort Master: your questions
Is the Ovation Ecovision VI 682 or the Linglong Comfort Master the better tire?
The Ovation Ecovision VI 682 and the Linglong Comfort Master have met in one independent test so far, and the Comfort Master finished ahead. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Ecovision VI 682 scores 5.5 and the Comfort Master 7.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Ecovision VI 682 or the Comfort Master?
The Ecovision VI 682 led 1 of the 1 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The Comfort Master led 1 of the 1 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 5.4/10 for the Ecovision VI 682 and 7.2/10 for the Comfort Master.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Ecovision VI 682 45% from 9 reviews and the Comfort Master 65% from 9. 22% of Ecovision VI 682 owners would buy it again, against 33% for the Comfort Master.
More comparisons with these tires
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.